I tend to agree with Rycoma, hence the reason I don't bother fishing there when there's better options elsewhere.
But…
This is exactly what these landowners want so I don't blame some for fishing there anyway. If their property is an exception to the general law applied everywhere else, wouldn't the burden of proof be in their hands? If the landowners are wrong, wouldn't they have to pay your legal fees if you took them to court for false accusing you i the first place? I believe this is exactly what is happening right now with a fellow from Cochrane.
Personally I don't have enough time to get into some legal battle over it, but man I wish somebody had the resources to take these people up on it (if the landowners are in fact wrong).
|