I just want to point out that I've never indicated that any wrong has been perpetrated by whoever has the head. I'm sure he had no idea who had shot it.
I'm simply trying to use the networking power of this forum to hopefully find some answers. Maybe a friend of the guy is on here, who knows.
It could definitely be argued that the finder is the rightful owner of the head. And I believe technically and leagally, that would be the case.
|