View Single Post
  #79  
Old 02-12-2023, 05:24 PM
Phil McCracken's Avatar
Phil McCracken Phil McCracken is offline
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Rocky Mtn House,AB
Posts: 2,214
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
Well quite frankly, I am just as sick and tired of you constantly defending the actions of the authorities , when they do commit illegal acts, which seems to be happening more and more. This clown willfull chose to violate the law, and then he wasn't fired, he resigned. And he was charged with only one charge for violating the game act, when most people would have also been charged with hunting out of season, using the vehicle, and since he was in uniform , likely not wearing the required colors for hunting in Manitoba. And of course we don't even know of he will receive a conditional discharge, like the officer in Calgary did when he willingly and knowingly violated the firearms laws, when he took his family to a shooting range , and illegally let them shoot banned firearms, as well as firearms that he had no license to even possess.
Yes the image of the RCMP is badly tarnished, but that is because of the actions of their own officers, and the actions
of the upper brass that has openly lied in their collusion with Trudeau, and his government.
You are tired of hearing about these incidents, well we keep hearing about them, because they keep occurring. The solution to not hearing about them, is for the police to stop commiting these illegal acts.
Yes a few bad apples are spoiling the barrel, but the force doesn't seem to be taking action to prevent this, instead they are hiring based on diversity, and quotas, instead of hiring the best people, and the prosecutors and judges, are letting them off easy, when they do commit an offense.
I did not defend this particular guy/event. Take off your blinders, and go back and read the thread.

I commented with the alleged information so far provided in this particular thread, which of course you obviously cannot for some reason. I also stated that all facts should be disclosed at trial. I am sure you will challenge that also. But it is all good.

And once again, you brought up a bunch of old irrelevant historical events not related to this thread as I suspected you would.

I must say, and others may also agree, you are extremely consistent with that...