Quote:
Originally Posted by CNP
It is private land is it not? The government provides the ACA with a mandate to operate insofar as to achieve specific outcomes. As said in post #2, a donors wishes may be responsible for the restriction. I wouldn't rifle hunt on that land, considering that the risk in doing so could lead to the loss of all hunting privileges on that land. Not all ACA site allow hunting. Of 777 conservation sites, 660 allow hunting. Move on...
|
The land is owned and was purchased by ACA. I have no problem with no hunting allowed, I have a big problem with special access to certain groups of outdoorsmen.
I would like to know who exactly would have the authority to revoke my hunting privileges on this land. I don't bow hunt so it would be a moot point anyway.