04-18-2018, 11:13 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,160
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken07AOVette
(1)thank you, (2)depends on your state of mind and intent at the time, (very likely many have not, and (4) I agree
Depends on the 'friend', lifelong or met at the bar while drinking, there are factors that are unavailable to the peanut gallery. And I agree completely, they should have all been charged and have had to testify before/after their own trials, I do not care which. But, again, and this is a WAG, but did the Crown do Stanley a favor in prosecuting the way they did? Huge WAG, but did they know it would be a Gladue response because of the people involved and chose to go this way?
|
Regardless of the prosecutors reasoning, he lost the Stanley case AND criminals were not held accountable. He failed in every way.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
|