View Single Post
  #83  
Old 05-08-2013, 06:10 PM
schmedlap schmedlap is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,692
Default Thank you!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by pesky672 View Post
Somebody… a lot of somebodies actually… need to be fired.
They should start with the Education Minister.

Early sexual education is a good thing BUT there must be reasonable limits.

At the point where you are posting tips on how to do an act that I can't even write here... on a bulletin board for pre-adolescents to refer to... you've crossed a line.
Further... there is a great deal of difference between informing young people what something is and actually advocating doing it.
Those "informational" postings appeared to be as more along the lines of encouraging than simply providing information.

Finally... schools are there to teach and along with the usual fare it is expected that they will help reinforce the morals of society on the whole.
That said, the TSD seems to be actively trying to redefine societal mores and undermine the morals of most parents.... or at least those parents that are more sexually conservative.
A designation that would (I assume) apply to the majority of parents…. if not the bulk of society itself.

Rather than take a reasonable neutral posture they have placed themselves in direct conflict with a great many people whose children attend those schools.
This alone is a breach of trust and there is little doubt it has resulted in the schools causing significant conflict within a number of families.

We lose our minds every time a young person is victimized sexually.
We cannot imagine how otherwise bright young people can be bamboozled by predators.
Is it any wonder now … when we see that public institutions are conditioning kids and normalizing all manner of sexual acts?
To the point that they are actually giving them pointers to improve their prowess?!?
If that encouragement to participate, practice and improve performance isn’t also helping facilitate perverts desires… I don’t know what else could.

Kids can't by Playboy magazine... but then why would they wish to when the information on that bulletin board is so much more... stimulating?

Maybe along with all the other things lost to cutbacks... we need to make some serious cuts to sex ed funding and get schools back to teaching what they used to be quite good at but are now failing to do... reading, scribe and arithmetic.
Perhaps schools should stick to just teaching kids where babies come from.

There are plenty of other resources out there that can be accessed should individuals with special needs wish to seek more information than that.
Excellent post. x2. I am not a "Christian" or any other such designation. I am a "heathen", by any definition. But if this kind of pure politically motivated, social engineering crap had appeared in any way in my kids' schools, or in any material they brought home, there would have been hell to pay. Now, we have school boards in Ontario publicly stating that they are "co-parenting" the children. With the exception of those unfortunates that have truly dreadful parents, for which there are other avenues of relief, that is NOT the function of the "educators". The people who subscribe to this sort of "education" have no concept of democratic society - they believe it somehow involves shouting down and intimidating everyone who does not subscribe to the same narrow views.
Thankfully, we do have the Sun News Network to take them on - the other "news" networks have become such toadies of the "politically correct" views in media context. Hopefully, the CRTC will give them the same "must carry" platforms in the cable environment so they can survive - to date they have determinedly tried to bring their alternative views and courageous questioning of that modality on their own money - huge losses due to not being given the same standing as the CBC (which sucks up over $1B of our tax money every year to bring us poor, misguided yardapes the "correct" view on everything), CTV, Global, etc. Might incentivize a little such journalistic courage on the part of the competition (well, not the CBC, because you and I pay through the nose for them not to need to be competitive).
Reply With Quote