Quote:
Originally Posted by thundergrey
Yah I am limited by my magazine so .020 is as close as I can get, it stacks the 140 BTs at max book charge so I can’t complain about the accuracy. I just wish they didn’t mess deer up so bad up close, then I look at the normal AB and if I see a deer at 300 yards, the AB seems to lack the hydrostatic punch to flop a deer. I’ve just had to track those deer for longer then I would like. Maybe better off shoulder shooting them. I donno.
|
I probably seem like a partition marketer at this point but I had the same dilemma, if your rifle groups them well give them a shot, expansion up close without the explosive effect of the BT and better hydrostatic chock at long range than the AB.