There is a vote in May amongst WHO members regarding a Pandemic Treaty.
WHO ‘May’, have legal authority to intervene in your countries health decisions.
It will be interesting. As how they vote, what about patent ownerships of vaccines, etc. can there actually be agreement amongst such large group of organizations? What about ‘us the people’, end users?
In a nut shell: The World Health Organization Geneva May 27-June 1, 2024 77th World Health Assembly Vote on: 1. Pandemic Agreement (Treaty) 2. Amendments to International Health Regulation (IHR) What does it mean for the world? - Loss of national sovereignty - Loss of personal sovereignty - Attack on patient/physician relationship - Surveillance of pathogens - Equity and ongoing vax production - Digital V-passport - Censorship - One Health (human health equal to animals and plants, dependent on climate change)
This is an unconditional surrender of all rights and democratic principles without a shot being fired!
Since we are highly censored in Canada, we find a lot of info on Yandex.com. We have many good Doctor's and scientists who will be attending and speaking at the who conference in May, fighting against this dyspotian future they have in store for us all.
The amount of people that are indifferent to this is staggering. I get a solid "Whatever" from half the people I mentioned this to.
The scariest part is it is an 'opt-out' scenario. Being a member automatically enrolls a country in this program.
What are the odds Sparkle Socks is going to stick his neck out against his handlers, in favour of his people?
I'm going with the safe bet of, ZERO.
We're screwed.
__________________
Social acceptance is NOT effective therapy.
WHO Pandemic Treaty 2024
Hybrid Mode
