Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-11-2012
Bushmaster Bushmaster is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Provost
Posts: 2,599
Default Another nuclear weapon tested in N.Alberta...??

Well, what else could it be !!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2012
super7mag's Avatar
super7mag super7mag is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vermilion ab
Posts: 1,222
Default

I seen that anvil cloud north west of myrnam yesterday , I thought it would make an awesome pic. Thanks for posting,
__________________
" I think many times we get too caught up in the pointed goal of simply bagging an animal, and often forget to enjoy the journey and often the struggle that is the hunt. " Timothy Herald.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-11-2012
Albertadiver's Avatar
Albertadiver Albertadiver is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,435
Default

That was from BBJ farting.....
__________________
Quote:
I hear Banjos.....

RUN!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-11-2012
Redneck Renagade's Avatar
Redneck Renagade Redneck Renagade is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 1,951
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Albertadiver View Post
That was from BBJ farting.....
Lol. Must have been a world record attempt at a blue angel
__________________
A fart is nothing but the lonely cry of an imprisoned turd
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-11-2012
huntinstuff's Avatar
huntinstuff huntinstuff is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 5,782
Default

REUTERS:
The metropolis of Bluesky, in their never-ending quest for Peace country domination, have again tested a nuclear bomb, contrary to the 1954 Treaty of Berwyn.

Duncan Reserve Chief Tony Testawich has concerns about the testing, but is quoted as saying, "Im pretty sure that nuclear stuff isnt probably good, but the moose are definitely bigger than they were 40 years ago, so maybe there's something to it".

Local residents have noted an increase in military operations in the area ever since the burning of Burkholder Building Supplies almost 25 years ago.

Last edited by huntinstuff; 07-11-2012 at 07:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-11-2012
colin455's Avatar
colin455 colin455 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Northern AB
Posts: 643
Default

That might explain the size of the darn horseflys this summer!

FLYZILLA!!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-11-2012
cody c cody c is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 404
Default

I heard a rumour that the yanks wanted to try some underground nuclear detonations in the tar sands to try out their weapons and also see if the could separate the bitumen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History..._and_heavy_oil)

maybe one day, would this be the cleaner version of oil for obama then?
__________________
feeding the occasional troll.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-11-2012
Scottsman Scottsman is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cody c View Post
Dead link. It must've been nuked.

Cool picture. I was flying over southern Alberta on the weekend. Saw a towering cumulus that was starting to anvil out. Pretty cool thing to see from 40,000 ft.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-11-2012
dantonsen's Avatar
dantonsen dantonsen is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: edmonton
Posts: 993
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cody c View Post
I heard a rumour that the yanks wanted to try some underground nuclear detonations in the tar sands to try out their weapons and also see if the could separate the bitumen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History..._and_heavy_oil)

maybe one day, would this be the cleaner version of oil for obama then?


Look up soviet unions PNE program, the used small nuclear bombs in their bitumin and extremely heavy oil resevoirs in the ural mountains and caspian region... The explosion melts the oil, creates sort of a cavern and the vacuum effect draws in the oil, apperantly works like a hot dam but then you have radioactive oil.

I forget what derailed the plan to try a bomb in alberta but they came pretty close to doing it
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-11-2012
greylynx greylynx is offline
Suspended User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,194
Default

I Have seen clouds like that over Westlock. I figure it is just Reeves in his background playing around with something.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-11-2012
Reeves1's Avatar
Reeves1 Reeves1 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Westlock
Posts: 3,523
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greylynx View Post
I Have seen clouds like that over Westlock. I figure it is just Reeves in his background playing around with something.




Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-11-2012
Alberta Bigbore's Avatar
Alberta Bigbore Alberta Bigbore is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 13,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Albertadiver View Post
That was from BBJ farting.....
Thats hilarious.... That is the exact same thing that came to my mind as I was reading over the first post. LOL
__________________
Alberta Bigbore

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-11-2012
cody c cody c is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottsman View Post
Dead link. It must've been nuked.

Cool picture. I was flying over southern Alberta on the weekend. Saw a towering cumulus that was starting to anvil out. Pretty cool thing to see from 40,000 ft.
i dont know why it did that, it refers to another page so you can click on the link there, this is from the other wiki page:

Thermonuclear thinking: The most dramatic proposal for in situ production from deep oil sand deposits came from Richfield Oil Company. In 1959 Richfield suggested an experimental plan to release liquid hydrocarbons from the sand through the expedient of an underground nuclear explosion. The company proposed detonating a 9-kiloton explosive device below the oil sands at a site 100 kilometres south of Fort McMurray. Thermonuclear heat would create a large underground cavern and simultaneously liquefy the oil. The cavern could serve as a collection point for the now-fluid oil, enabling the company to produce it.
This idea came remarkably close to reality. The project received federal approval in Canada, and the United States Atomic Energy Commission agreed to provide the device. But before the experiment could take place, public pressure for an international ban on nuclear testing had mounted. The provincial government withheld approval and thus killed the plan.
__________________
feeding the occasional troll.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-11-2012
pesky672's Avatar
pesky672 pesky672 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,266
Default

Some good old boys still cooking off.
__________________
Pesky 672

Political correctness is just tyranny with manners...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-12-2012
Classic_Cool's Avatar
Classic_Cool Classic_Cool is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,978
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cody c View Post
i dont know why it did that, it refers to another page so you can click on the link there, this is from the other wiki page:

Thermonuclear thinking: The most dramatic proposal for in situ production from deep oil sand deposits came from Richfield Oil Company. In 1959 Richfield suggested an experimental plan to release liquid hydrocarbons from the sand through the expedient of an underground nuclear explosion. The company proposed detonating a 9-kiloton explosive device below the oil sands at a site 100 kilometres south of Fort McMurray. Thermonuclear heat would create a large underground cavern and simultaneously liquefy the oil. The cavern could serve as a collection point for the now-fluid oil, enabling the company to produce it.
This idea came remarkably close to reality. The project received federal approval in Canada, and the United States Atomic Energy Commission agreed to provide the device. But before the experiment could take place, public pressure for an international ban on nuclear testing had mounted. The provincial government withheld approval and thus killed the plan.
People would use radiation to brush their teeth back then lol. Back in the bad old days.

Still hard to believe they had nuclear anti-aircraft missles to shoot down the Soviets. The US was also developing a nuclear powered bomber.

And something I always liked are the nuclear powered lighthouses that still exist off the coast of the former Soviet Union.

How terrorists haven't managed to attack us with nuclear weapons before now is a mystery
__________________
1st Offense: We shoot you
2nd Offense: We shoot you
3rd Offense: We give you a mental evaluation, and then we shoot you
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-12-2012
Arachnodisiac's Avatar
Arachnodisiac Arachnodisiac is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Porcupine Hills
Posts: 1,877
Default

Nothing would surprise me anymore.
__________________
There is nothing to writing. All you do is sit down at a typewriter and bleed. ~ Ernest Hemingway
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.