Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 09-30-2012
Matt L.'s Avatar
Matt L. Matt L. is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mayerthorpe area
Posts: 3,170
Default

You have a point Keg, just gotta give the Pitbulls a shot of mace and go on with your day.
And btw, gopher may have had a semi-valid point, but I don't kindly to be called a liar from behind a keyboard by a retard who doesn't know me.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 09-30-2012
bessiedog's Avatar
bessiedog bessiedog is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,712
Default

I'll agree with Matt here Keg.

I apologize for coming off as Pittbull if I did.
But if you don't know me , don't know anyone who knows me, don't call me a liar. I did ask in my post if this was a troll.

I also teach alot of new hunters, as well as my 4 kids. If Gopher wants to make a point, how's about he not try insulting people by calling us liars. If that's his attitude, I hope he keeps his muzzle strapped tight this time.. Lol

I've never scoped anyone. Binos first and always. I've only started using a scope two years ago. Bambi is correct, it's a very good topic and should be discussed. I think alot of new hunters do a tonne of learning from posters here.

Again, sorry if I pit bulled , but I thought he bit first.
__________________
"How vain it is to sit down to write when you have not stood up to live.”
-HDT
"A vote is like a rifle; its usefulness depends on the character of the user." T. Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 09-30-2012
chuck's Avatar
chuck chuck is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,377
Default

Gotta love the utility of these "we will change the world" threads.

I have more meaningful conversation with my three year old son.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 09-30-2012
gopher gopher is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 990
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L. View Post
You have a point Keg, just gotta give the Pitbulls a shot of mace and go on with your day.
And btw, gopher may have had a semi-valid point, but I don't kindly to be called a liar from behind a keyboard by a retard who doesn't know me.
That's all most of you fourm clowns do is sit behind a computer...
__________________
" Free ELk "
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 09-30-2012
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. Mcmurray, AB
Posts: 18,148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gopher View Post
That's all most of you fourm clowns do is sit behind a computer...
Uh, that's not painting with a wide briush, I think you threw the whole bucket at the forum, Gopher!!
Cat
__________________
Of course my vintage guns get shot - Why the heck do you think they call them SHOT guns for?!
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 09-30-2012
gopher gopher is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 990
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bessiedog View Post
I'll agree with Matt here Keg.

I apologize for coming off as Pittbull if I did.
But if you don't know me , don't know anyone who knows me, don't call me a liar. I did ask in my post if this was a troll.

I also teach alot of new hunters, as well as my 4 kids. If Gopher wants to make a point, how's about he not try insulting people by calling us liars. If that's his attitude, I hope he keeps his muzzle strapped tight this time.. Lol

I've never scoped anyone. Binos first and always. I've only started using a scope two years ago. Bambi is correct, it's a very good topic and should be discussed. I think alot of new hunters do a tonne of learning from posters here.

Again, sorry if I pit bulled , but I thought he bit first.
.
__________________
" Free ELk "

Last edited by Kanonfodder; 09-30-2012 at 09:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 09-30-2012
sheephunter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

LOL...why do you find it so hard to believe some folks have never glassed through their scope? Perhaps they had a good teacher off the bat. I can guarantee most if not all of the hunters I've mentored have never done it. No doubt lots of hunters have done it but to say everyone has is a bit naive on your part....xx xxx xxx xxxx xxxxxxxx.

Last edited by KegRiver; 10-01-2012 at 10:17 PM. Reason: un-neccisary comment
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 09-30-2012
sheephunter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gopher View Post
People are lazy even you...
I agree....not sure anyone is lazier than me. It's way easier for me to grab my binos and get a good look at something rather than shouldering my rifle. Perhaps you should keep your binos handy and you could break the habit. A good bino harness is the key....but even a strap around your neck would work.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 09-30-2012
Hotwheels81's Avatar
Hotwheels81 Hotwheels81 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Valleyview AB
Posts: 768
Default

My hunting rifle choices and optics would make "glassing" rather awkward
Besides... I have a nice little leupold green ring that has much better FOV and control then a rifle scope.

My uncle told me of an incident where he was being scoped by another hunter back in the early 80's around Adams lake BC... Apparently a blaze orange vest and toque whilst waving at the fellow from a few hundred yards did nothing to abate the situation but when he pointed his rifle at the gentlemen in return and worked the bolt... Well... Suddenly it musta dawned on the guy what he was doing was a baaad idea...
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 09-30-2012
Canuck Bob's Avatar
Canuck Bob Canuck Bob is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 253
Default

I'm sorry I brought this up. I feel strongly about talking gun and hunting safety as a legitimate activity for hunting and shooting forums. I'm not trying to change the world and am not a liar. However my desire to talk gun safety is an annoyance or causes much anger in many members. I have made the error of starting sensitive threads before and regretted it. I had no expectation of this one causing such an uproar and resulting in such nasty personal attacks. Posting here is becoming a minefield often resulting in this outcome.
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 09-30-2012
Robmcleod82's Avatar
Robmcleod82 Robmcleod82 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 704
Default

I find the level of how delusional most of the people who posted in this thread are extremely concerning. I assume most of you always have your safety on as well.
__________________
"I don't know about the "shooting Savages" part. I have one and I have had considerable difficulty doing well with it. Part of the reason for this is that I feel a need to put bag over my head to hide my identity when ever I am shooting it!"
Leeper
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 09-30-2012
philthygeezer philthygeezer is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 121
Default

+1 to the stupidity explanation.

It is just plain stupid.
__________________
Join CSSA + Join the NFA online!
For the price of two bricks of .22, you can hurl a couple of figurative bricks through a window in Ottawa, with your message attached!
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 09-30-2012
gopher gopher is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 990
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philthygeezer View Post
+1 to the stupidity explanation.

It is just plain stupid.
On TV a point is always made to show the safety being turned off. Most here appear to live in the reality of TV and internet forums with little actual outside experience.

The window lickers here may find it hard to believe I have firearms with the safety removed others that never came with one from the factory and one drilled with a screw so it can never be used.
__________________
" Free ELk "
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 09-30-2012
bessiedog's Avatar
bessiedog bessiedog is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,712
Default

Yup,

Your from under the bridge.

Big tough keyboard jockey. Probably got kicked out of cadets.
Camo, keyboard and moms basement.

Your a joke bud.

Done here.
__________________
"How vain it is to sit down to write when you have not stood up to live.”
-HDT
"A vote is like a rifle; its usefulness depends on the character of the user." T. Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 09-30-2012
sheephunter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It stuns me that some are trying to justify this illegal and stupid practice. Sure lots of people have done it in the past and hopefully have learned from their stupidity but to somehow try to justify it blows my mind. It might be safer to become a window licker

I'd have never guessed this was a sensitive thread Bob.....just seems like plain common sense to me.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 09-30-2012
elnino54's Avatar
elnino54 elnino54 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gopher View Post
Anyone that says they have nerer used there scope for glassing is a flat out liar.
Then I'm a liar too.....
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 09-30-2012
Ken T Ken T is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 34
Default

Having had many an opportunity to take x-ray pictures of those who have been on the receiving end of a firearm projectile....living and deceased.

I think that a couple of those were hunting "accidents" even.

It imparts a very healthy respect for what bullets and shot do to the person.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 09-30-2012
Robmcleod82's Avatar
Robmcleod82 Robmcleod82 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 704
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter View Post
It stuns me that some are trying to justify this illegal and stupid practice. Sure lots of people have done it in the past and hopefully have learned from their stupidity but to somehow try to justify it blows my mind. It might be safer to become a window licker

I'd have never guessed this was a sensitive thread Bob.....just seems like plain common sense to me.
Sheep hunter could you please show us in the criminal code of canada where it states that it is illegal to look through a rifle scope at a general area or object? I never read where gopher said he was pointing a rifle at people. You would think somebody who writes for a living would have good reading comprehension skills.
__________________
"I don't know about the "shooting Savages" part. I have one and I have had considerable difficulty doing well with it. Part of the reason for this is that I feel a need to put bag over my head to hide my identity when ever I am shooting it!"
Leeper
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 09-30-2012
Matt L.'s Avatar
Matt L. Matt L. is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mayerthorpe area
Posts: 3,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canuck Bob View Post
I'm sorry I brought this up. I feel strongly about talking gun and hunting safety as a legitimate activity for hunting and shooting forums. I'm not trying to change the world and am not a liar. However my desire to talk gun safety is an annoyance or causes much anger in many members. I have made the error of starting sensitive threads before and regretted it. I had no expectation of this one causing such an uproar and resulting in such nasty personal attacks. Posting here is becoming a minefield often resulting in this outcome.
Don't be sorry. It's something that needs to be talked about. As for gopher, well, trolls will be trolls.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 09-30-2012
Robmcleod82's Avatar
Robmcleod82 Robmcleod82 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 704
Default

It sure is interesting how gopher gets suspended for speaking his mind yet others can threaten him on the thread and nothing happens. Threatening someone you dont know is one of the most stupid things you could do, didnt your dad tell you there will always be somebody bigger and tougher. I wish I lived in a world where my chit smelled like roses and I could beat up chuck norris
__________________
"I don't know about the "shooting Savages" part. I have one and I have had considerable difficulty doing well with it. Part of the reason for this is that I feel a need to put bag over my head to hide my identity when ever I am shooting it!"
Leeper
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 09-30-2012
missingtwo missingtwo is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: south of Edm
Posts: 189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robmcleod82 View Post
Sheep hunter could you please show us in the criminal code of canada where it states that it is illegal to look through a rifle scope at a general area or object? I never read where gopher said he was pointing a rifle at people. You would think somebody who writes for a living would have good reading comprehension skills.
I hafta agree with you Rob. I went back and read gophers posts, and nowhere did he say hpointed his gun at anyone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robmcleod82 View Post
It sure is interesting how gopher gets suspended for speaking his mind yet others can threaten him on the thread and nothing happens. Threatening someone you dont know is one of the most stupid things you could do, didnt your dad tell you there will always be somebody bigger and tougher. I wish I lived in a world where my chit smelled like roses and I could beat up chuck norris
Again, I agree. He was only stating his opinion, albeit disagreeable by most. It is still just an opinion. Oh yeah he called a few people liars , boo hoo.


Just to add. I may have scoped people in the past. But it would have been while looking/ aiming at game that happened to be in line with someone. If I noticed the person I lowered my gun right away. Since the red clothing rule changed it is much harder to see fellow hunters. I quit hunting that area for about 10 years as it was obviously overcrowded.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 09-30-2012
sheephunter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robmcleod82 View Post
Sheep hunter could you please show us in the criminal code of canada where it states that it is illegal to look through a rifle scope at a general area or object? I never read where gopher said he was pointing a rifle at people. You would think somebody who writes for a living would have good reading comprehension skills.
Never said it was illegal to "look through a rifle scope at a general area or object" nor did I mention gopher's name in the post you quoted. And you want to talk about reading comprehension skills.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 10-01-2012
KegRiver's Avatar
KegRiver KegRiver is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: North of Peace River
Posts: 4,698
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bessiedog View Post
I'll agree with Matt here Keg.

I apologize for coming off as Pittbull if I did.
But if you don't know me , don't know anyone who knows me, don't call me a liar. I did ask in my post if this was a troll.

I also teach alot of new hunters, as well as my 4 kids. If Gopher wants to make a point, how's about he not try insulting people by calling us liars. If that's his attitude, I hope he keeps his muzzle strapped tight this time.. Lol

I've never scoped anyone. Binos first and always. I've only started using a scope two years ago. Bambi is correct, it's a very good topic and should be discussed. I think alot of new hunters do a tonne of learning from posters here.

Again, sorry if I pit bulled , but I thought he bit first.
Calling people a liar was not a good choice of words. And painting everyone with the same brush isn't wise either.

Even the PitBull comment was probably not the best choice of words, but a couple of posts did come on rather strong.

I am more concerned that name calling has become far too common.

Calling people who weren't blessed with the best mentors, cheap or idiots isn't a good way to get a good discussion going. And it's not going to win anyone over to the good side either.

But I do understand that for some people this subject brings up some very troubling memories. For those members it is understandable that they would not necessarily be in a diplomatic mood concerning the subject matter.

I wonder if perhaps it would be better if those people would be well advised to not respond until they can do so respectfully with regards to other members.

Keep in mind folks. Rule #1 still applies. and I quote.

Quote:
Profanities, racism, flaming and other belittling remarks made towards other message board users will not be tolerated and will result in suspension of message board privileges.
If I were doing my job properly, I would have suspended a number of members, some of them long time members, in recent days.

Let's keep it civil folks.


And you are right bambi, it is a perfect time to discuss this subject. There is no better time in my opinion. And I also agree whole heartedly that it needs to be discussed. But in a civil manner.

Please keep in mind folks, even die hard poachers have changed their ways.
And often they are among the most adamant supporters of safe and ethical hunting.

Also remember that not everyone is a good communicator. Or a skilled debater.

Is there no room for them here?

Last edited by KegRiver; 10-01-2012 at 12:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 10-01-2012
philthygeezer philthygeezer is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 121
Default

Talking about whether safeties are on or off or chambers are empty or not doesn't justify pointing a rifle at me to see whether I am a deer.

1. All guns are always loaded
2. Never point a gun at anything you aren't willing to destroy.

If you scope me, I will be more than livid. I will chew your ass out and may or may not report you to the RCMP for being criminally stupid.
__________________
Join CSSA + Join the NFA online!
For the price of two bricks of .22, you can hurl a couple of figurative bricks through a window in Ottawa, with your message attached!
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 10-01-2012
rem338win's Avatar
rem338win rem338win is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Salmon Arm
Posts: 998
Default

Now I do put this forward. I am hunting mule deer, and I see a buck moving between a stand of trees toward the coulee edge at say 300yds.
Well I am hunting the said sex and species so I drop and put the scope on the beasty. Notice he has it all, but is crabbed up on the fronts and is below the 165 mark I have set for myself. Pack up watch for any friends with my binos now and walk away.
Is that irresponsible use of a firearm and scope? Or prudent operation? I am in the later category.....
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 10-01-2012
sheephunter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rem338win View Post
Now I do put this forward. I am hunting mule deer, and I see a buck moving between a stand of trees toward the coulee edge at say 300yds.
Well I am hunting the said sex and species so I drop and put the scope on the beasty. Notice he has it all, but is crabbed up on the fronts and is below the 165 mark I have set for myself. Pack up watch for any friends with my binos now and walk away.
Is that irresponsible use of a firearm and scope? Or prudent operation? I am in the later category.....
My rule of thumb is to never point a firearm and look through the scope at anything until I've indentified the target. In your scenario it sounds like you identified the target before pointing the firearm and just chose not to shoot.

The whole looking through a scope thing could be analyzed to death and thousands of scenarios offered up but at the end of the day, use common sense. Using a scope to glass areas or identify an unknown target is definitely not using common sense, IMHO...but sense doesn't seem to be as common as it once was.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 10-01-2012
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 14,056
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rem338win View Post
Now I do put this forward. I am hunting mule deer, and I see a buck moving between a stand of trees toward the coulee edge at say 300yds.
Well I am hunting the said sex and species so I drop and put the scope on the beasty. Notice he has it all, but is crabbed up on the fronts and is below the 165 mark I have set for myself. Pack up watch for any friends with my binos now and walk away.
Is that irresponsible use of a firearm and scope? Or prudent operation? I am in the later category.....
I wouldn't be bothered by that. You are putting your scope on what you know to be a game animal that you are likely to shoot. The thread seems to be more about "glassing", which in this case I took to mean the general scanning we do to look for game, or checking something out, the identity of which we are not yet sure of. If the background is such that you can tell there isn't anyone in it, then I don't see the problem.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 10-01-2012
philthygeezer philthygeezer is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 121
Default

3. Be sure of your target and what is behind it.

You already knew it was a game animal.

This is basic stuff. People that point scoped rifles at things to identify them are breaking fundamental rules of safe firearms handling.
__________________
Join CSSA + Join the NFA online!
For the price of two bricks of .22, you can hurl a couple of figurative bricks through a window in Ottawa, with your message attached!
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 10-01-2012
Gman75 Gman75 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Rocky View
Posts: 43
Default

Gotta love it when "young people" are pointed out first.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 10-01-2012
score score is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,352
Default

Yeah Gman75. MY 11 year old son sounds like me when I started with him when he was very young. It's getting on my nerves, him constantly reminding and asking me; safety on?, be careful, lets be safe, watch where we point these things, is your gun empty, etc.. No really it's a good thing and I'm a very proud. The unsafest guy I ever hunted with many years ago now was my age. After a few episodes and reminders, I have no idea if he is still even alive. Haven't seen him in years. He was a nice fella but scared the heck out of me. He did not grow up around guns and hunting. Sometimes we take stuff for granted and think gun safety is just an intelligent, common sense thing that's natural but it's not in many cases. It is something that is taught and drilled into you when young. Those that weren't taught sometimes struggle with it because it's not second nature to them no matter how old they are.
__________________
"It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions." Daniel Webster

Last edited by score; 10-01-2012 at 02:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.