|
12-29-2016, 12:03 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,588
|
|
Would a dugout with fish near a river be considered a tributary of the river?
A friend said he saw pike swimming in a very large dugout that is a few hundred yards away from a river. Who knows how they got there. Anyhow, if a guy were to fish this "pond", would it be considered a tributary or part of the river itself?
Sent from my LG-H812 using Tapatalk
|
12-29-2016, 12:33 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,003
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sns2
A friend said he saw pike swimming in a very large dugout that is a few hundred yards away from a river. Who knows how they got there. Anyhow, if a guy were to fish this "pond", would it be considered a tributary or part of the river itself?
Sent from my LG-H812 using Tapatalk
|
Is it a dugout/pond or attached to the river via surface? Stream, ditch, etc?
Id say its atand alone if not. But i honestly got zero idea on the regulations regarding that situation. And cant find em either.
|
12-29-2016, 09:01 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 735
|
|
Not a tributary. Unnamed, non-specified water bodies are covered by the general species regulations for the zone. Fish can move around in surprising ways during floods.
|
12-29-2016, 09:06 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,595
|
|
it most likely got there from the spring runoff where rivers and such crested the banks and then retracted back when the water levels dropped. i have also seen a few places like this.
|
12-29-2016, 11:03 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,520
|
|
General regulations would apply. The pond is in the same watershed but not a trib.
__________________
|
12-29-2016, 01:48 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Kananaskis
Posts: 2,612
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyTheory
General regulations would apply. The pond is in the same watershed but not a trib.
|
^^^
__________________
the bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of a low price is forgotten
instagram: @schrodo_of_the_shire
|
12-29-2016, 02:24 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyTheory
General regulations would apply. The pond is in the same watershed but not a trib.
|
Do the regs apply to a private pond on private land? I'm assuming we aren't talking about a dugout on public land.
|
12-29-2016, 02:57 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,520
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian
Do the regs apply to a private pond on private land? I'm assuming we aren't talking about a dugout on public land.
|
I'd assume so, think of stauffer tribs. Regs still apply even though the land surrounding is owned.
DISCLAIMER: I don't know for sure.
__________________
|
12-29-2016, 04:29 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,588
|
|
I went out this am with two 13 yr olds. The pond is actually an old gravel pit. Checked Google Earth and there are no creeks that feed it. It is approx 200 yards as the crow flies from the NSR, where there is next to nothing for a bank. Fish would have made their way there when river crested it's banks. Anyhow, my sin caught a 23" pike after a minute of jigging. Two hours, and twenty holes later, no more pike.
We packed up and headed to Wab. Not much action here either.
Sent from my LG-H812 using Tapatalk
|
12-29-2016, 04:37 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,692
|
|
And
Quote:
Originally Posted by sns2
I went out this am with two 13 yr olds. The pond is actually an old gravel pit. Checked Google Earth and there are no creeks that feed it. It is approx 200 yards as the crow flies from the NSR, where there is next to nothing for a bank. Fish would have made their way there when river crested it's banks. Anyhow, my sin caught a 23" pike after a minute of jigging. Two hours, and twenty holes later, no more pike.
We packed up and headed to Wab. Not much action here either.
Sent from my LG-H812 using Tapatalk
|
Since it is non-permanent, the fish trapped there after the flood would likely have very little natural forage and/or will be winter killed. So removing them and either eating them or moving them back to the river is probably a good thing (?).
|
12-29-2016, 04:45 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 1,786
|
|
Back in the days we flood irrigated at our place near Brooks we would actually find pike swimming in the flooded field...our dog had a blast chasing them.
__________________
Common sense is so rare these days, that it should be considered a super power.
|
12-29-2016, 05:02 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,588
|
|
It was worth a try with two youngsters.
Sent from my LG-H812 using Tapatalk
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:59 AM.
|