Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-18-2007, 07:52 AM
wildman wildman is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 498
Default whitecourt doomed???

saw this on the news last night...rather unsettling...woodlands county to build a nuclear power plant...3-eyed fish, here we come...

http://www.630ched.com/news/news_loc...news_local.cfm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-18-2007, 08:55 AM
PainKiller
 
Posts: n/a
Default Not Bad

Well you know it has to go some where cant see it being stoped now, and yes i hunt around the court .I guess we all know where the next world record NON-Typaical will come from . {Doomed} is a strong word i dont think so.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-18-2007, 09:32 AM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Buy Whitecourt property NOW!!!!!!! Which way do you think the prices are going to go when hundreds of well-paid nuclear plant employees move to town?????
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-19-2007, 08:38 AM
wildman wildman is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 498
Default !!!

ok...this JUST happened a few days ago.
replace the name JAPAN with the name WHITECOURT...
no danger, my *****!!!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/19/wo...0c4&ei=5087%0A
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-19-2007, 09:06 AM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildman View Post
ok...this JUST happened a few days ago.
replace the name JAPAN with the name WHITECOURT...
no danger, my *****!!!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/19/wo...0c4&ei=5087%0A
Yeah, if Whitecourt is hit by a huge earthquake that collapses buildings and leaves 9,000 homeless as the story says. I think that risk is a WEE bit less than in Japan. And they still say the spill was below dangerous levels with all of that. Given the magnitude of the earthquake and the damage it wrought, I'd say that plant must be pretty well built.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-19-2007, 09:06 AM
SNAPFisher SNAPFisher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,461
Default

What does an earth quake in Japan have to do with Whitecourt? Last time I checked Whitecourt does not encounter earth quakes very often....okay i'm being sarcastic.

I do agree that I would rather not see nuclear power here in Alberta. Byproducts from such a plant are a bit frightening to me and others I would imagine.

On the other hand, power is becoming more and more utilized in AB. This is only going to grow. Where is the additional power going to come from? The sun? More rivers, if there are any left untapped? Wind?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-19-2007, 09:24 AM
CNP's Avatar
CNP CNP is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: WMU 303
Posts: 8,508
Default Solutions or Cynicism

Some offer solutions others offer cynicism. AB needs power. Fom where I sit I can't say that the right or wrong choices have been made but I'm sure that a process was followed leading to who/what/when/where/why. To those who oppose any of the w's what is your solution and how did you arrive at it.....or is it a not-in-my-backyard approach (which is understandable).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-19-2007, 12:14 PM
wildman wildman is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 498
Default !!!

hey ehntr,
yup. that's exactly my point.
it doesn't matter how "safe" the facility is. we're talking about NUCLEAR FALLOUT.
we do NOT have eathquakes but how about vandalism, eco-terrorism, bombings, raging forest fires, tornadoes, off the top of my head...
THAT'S my point...one accident and she's toast!!!
just saying there's gotta be better solutions...solar, wind, alternate fuels, something that we WON'T regret?????
my $0.02...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-19-2007, 12:35 PM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,655
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildman View Post
hey ehntr,
yup. that's exactly my point.
it doesn't matter how "safe" the facility is. we're talking about NUCLEAR FALLOUT.
we do NOT have eathquakes but how about vandalism, eco-terrorism, bombings, raging forest fires, tornadoes, off the top of my head...
THAT'S my point...one accident and she's toast!!!
just saying there's gotta be better solutions...solar, wind, alternate fuels, something that we WON'T regret?????
my $0.02...
With Alberta growing at a rate of something like 300 Mega Watts / year, and In 2 years Wabumum 4 being decomisshioned(400MW) it does'nt take a genius to do the math that in about 4 years Alberta wont have enough generating capacity to look after our selves. Capital projects take 5 to 10 years to build, alternate sources add so little to the grid capacity it's almost un feasable.
Coal fired and gas fired generation are now being viewed as bad or worse than nuclear energy.
Gee what a conundrum we are in.
__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-19-2007, 03:12 PM
SNAPFisher SNAPFisher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,461
Default

Yeah WM, I read you. Just it being there is enough risk. Sigh
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-19-2007, 04:20 PM
CNP's Avatar
CNP CNP is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: WMU 303
Posts: 8,508
Default Vulnerability

Quote:
hey ehntr,
yup. that's exactly my point.
it doesn't matter how "safe" the facility is. we're talking about NUCLEAR FALLOUT.
we do NOT have eathquakes but how about vandalism, eco-terrorism, bombings, raging forest fires, tornadoes, off the top of my head...
THAT'S my point...one accident and she's toast!!!
just saying there's gotta be better solutions...solar, wind, alternate fuels, something that we WON'T regret?????
my $0.02...
We have always been vulnerable to the threaths you describe (vandalism, eco-terrorism, bombings, raging forest fires, tornadoes). Gas/Oil are still flowing, all the other generating stations are operating. South Ontario has many nuke generators. South Ontario is the most densely populated area in all of Canada and on top of that these generators are situated on large bodies of Water (Lake Ontario/Huron).
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-19-2007, 08:00 PM
muzzy muzzy is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St. Albert, AB
Posts: 1,178
Red face

Heck Wildman there are nuclear power plants at pickering ontario which is about 40 min east of Toronto Been there about 30 years. You could get a job patrolling the parimeter of the plant in Whitecourt to shoot terrorists and we'd all sleep better
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-20-2007, 08:17 AM
FiveO's Avatar
FiveO FiveO is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 216
Default

I dont at all like the idea of the plant going up. Not only the risk of a disater but how do you think they are going to get there water supply?. It takes massive amounts of water to cool a nuclear plant and what happens to the water after its heated?.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-20-2007, 09:32 AM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FiveO View Post
I dont at all like the idea of the plant going up. Not only the risk of a disater but how do you think they are going to get there water supply?. It takes massive amounts of water to cool a nuclear plant and what happens to the water after its heated?.

It turns the turbine, then heads for the cooling tower
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-21-2007, 09:21 PM
Grizzly Adams's Avatar
Grizzly Adams Grizzly Adams is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
Default

And then back into the river it came from, still warmer than it started out, along with a few additives, some radioctive and some just heavy metals it picked up in its travels.
Grizz
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-21-2007, 09:52 PM
Jamie Jamie is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,384
Default

What do you guys all think powers the Computers you are looking at right now?

Damn a river and the whole world falls apart, cant burn coal, cant drill for oil and gas... Where does it all end?

We need this stuff, perhaps it is a matter of what is worse?

Jamie
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-21-2007, 11:13 PM
WCTHEMI's Avatar
WCTHEMI WCTHEMI is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 2,223
Default

Here's a link to a great site that shows how it works. When people come to understand something, they can get over their fear of it. Just like taking an anti along on a trip to the range or hunting or fishing.

http://science.howstuffworks.com/nuclear-power.htm
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-22-2007, 09:52 AM
Grizzly Adams's Avatar
Grizzly Adams Grizzly Adams is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
Default

I guess a good start would be to make our expectations a little more realistic. In the 1940's the average house was about 850 sq. ft and at least 4 people lived in it. Today, the average is over [from a construction magazine I get] 2000 and only a couple live there, not to mention all the energy using "conveniences". The problem with nuclear power is that the problems it creates, will outlast the human race. After living with the atom thing for over 100 years, we have still not found a long term solution to dealing with the waste products produced. It's easy enough to say the chances of an accident are statistically very low, but if the time period is long enough, it becomes 100%, especially if a multitude of plants are built.
Grizz
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-22-2007, 01:46 PM
bearbait's Avatar
bearbait bearbait is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: whitecourt
Posts: 1,183
Default

i still dont like the idea as im in whitecourt but untill i see the enviromental impact assesment ill stay low on this one...

good luck on buying property up here right now..pretty pricey...i payed 325,000 for my place in oct and its up to 465,000 right now....
__________________
a 7mm will drop anything LIVING THE DREAM!!! I get to goto work and play with guns and bows all day!!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-22-2007, 11:37 PM
Grizzly Adams's Avatar
Grizzly Adams Grizzly Adams is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
Default

A 7mm may drop anything, but a drop in the price of oil would work just as well, in Alberta.
Grizz
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-23-2007, 12:17 AM
DLP's Avatar
DLP DLP is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 149
Default Drop in Price of OIL

Hey grizzly what do you mean "A drop in the price of Oil will kill everything" Nuclear power is a safe viable form of alternative energy! To see the oil patch go through another depression would hurt much more than it did in the 80's, this is a big machine now to many families depend on it.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-23-2007, 08:01 AM
Grizzly Adams's Avatar
Grizzly Adams Grizzly Adams is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
Default

How quickly we forget. Remember those bumper stickers, "Dear Lord, please give us another oil boom, etc." This time we better not **** it all away. I just finished looking through Real Estate listings and you are right, there are a lot of people depending on the oil industry to barely afford some of those 500,000. shacks, plus all those expensive toys. As they say, what goes up must come down and when it does, as it will, there are going to be some very sorry people. As for atomic energy being safe, the jury is still out on that. What I see is an ever growing accumulation of nuclear waste, hazardous for hundreds of thousands of years, that we have not learned to deal with.
Grizz
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.