Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #361  
Old 04-06-2014, 06:31 PM
expmler expmler is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lizard Lake, SK.
Posts: 2,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish gunner View Post
Read closely ....trained individual . Snap.
A huge portion of hunters have never had to have any training to own or use firearms. The PAL system has only been in existence for a short period of time.
  #362  
Old 04-06-2014, 06:34 PM
Wild&Free Wild&Free is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by expmler View Post
A huge portion of hunters have never had to have any training to own or use firearms. The PAL system has only been in existence for a short period of time.
before PAL there was CORE. and FAC
__________________
Respond, not react. - Saskatchewan proverb

We learn from history that we do not learn from history. - Hegel

Your obligation to fight has not been relieved because the battle is fierce and difficult. Ben Shapiro
  #363  
Old 04-06-2014, 06:37 PM
fish gunner fish gunner is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a mishn for fishn.
Posts: 8,790
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by expmler View Post
A huge portion of hunters have never had to have any training to own or use firearms. The PAL system has only been in existence for a short period of time.
As posted core and hunters ed has been in existance since iirc before 87 when i took it in high school. Both giveing certification in the use and handling of firearms now with pal and r pal maybe those in there 50's and older would not be trained but the common sense abounded something missing today.
  #364  
Old 04-06-2014, 06:38 PM
Matt L.'s Avatar
Matt L. Matt L. is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Whitecourt
Posts: 5,818
Default

So I'm willing to bet that a bunch of you anti-gun folks are in favour of the Toronto police chiefs wanting to have all guns locked up in a central armoury where you have to come in and sign them out if they feel like letting you that day?
  #365  
Old 04-06-2014, 06:49 PM
expmler expmler is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lizard Lake, SK.
Posts: 2,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild&Free View Post
before PAL there was CORE. and FAC
It wasn't until 1994 that you had to take training to get the FAC. Until then all you had to do was apply and you got one. I think you can still challenge the test to get a PAL without any training.
  #366  
Old 04-06-2014, 06:49 PM
TBD TBD is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: calgary, Alberta
Posts: 1,881
Default Yes - I think

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L. View Post
So I'm willing to bet that a bunch of you anti-gun folks are in favour of the Toronto police chiefs wanting to have all guns locked up in a central armoury where you have to come in and sign them out if they feel like letting you that day?

that would make FG happy.


... unless your military or police alumni !

Last edited by TBD; 04-06-2014 at 07:00 PM.
  #367  
Old 04-06-2014, 06:54 PM
nelsonob1's Avatar
nelsonob1 nelsonob1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Nelson BC
Posts: 2,038
Default

I personally don't equate gun control with being anti gun.

I love guns, absolutely everything about them. However, I am also in favour of gun restrictions that control for example, education, usage, ownership, transport, etc. I prefer a cautious but rationale approach to who has them and how and when they may be used. For me there is no point in letting people carry guns unless you are prepared for them to use them and frankly, I can not think of any reasonable way of educating and testing the general population when it is appropriate to take a life.
  #368  
Old 04-06-2014, 06:55 PM
Burglecut83 Burglecut83 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,003
Default So true

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBD View Post
that would make FG happy.


... unless you military or police alumni !
LOL gummer is quite the cat
  #369  
Old 04-06-2014, 06:58 PM
expmler expmler is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lizard Lake, SK.
Posts: 2,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nelsonob1 View Post
I personally don't equate gun control with being anti gun.

I love guns, absolutely everything about them. However, I am also in favour of gun restrictions that control for example, education, usage, ownership, transport, etc. I prefer a cautious but rationale approach to who has them and how and when they may be used. For me there is no point in letting people carry guns unless you are prepared for them to use them and frankly, I can not think of any reasonable way of educating and testing the general population when it is appropriate to take a life.
I equate gun control with people control.

They train the police, which are part of the general population. Why couldn't you or I be trained the same.
  #370  
Old 04-06-2014, 07:02 PM
fish gunner fish gunner is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a mishn for fishn.
Posts: 8,790
Cool

So sensible restrictions with appropriate training limiting ownership to those of good standing some how = anti. Ok. the fact that the system useing the non restrictive easy access to fire arms will have more gun shot deaths this month than canadas total homicides this year. mean nothing not a jota yet if we look to other nations like lsreal or the swiss with equally high ownership with a trained crtified poulace we see a similar muder rate to Canada's restrictive access hmmm well im lost. I guess americans just like shootn each other cause no amount of thinkin, evidence and experience makes any sense. Lol
  #371  
Old 04-06-2014, 07:07 PM
fish gunner fish gunner is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a mishn for fishn.
Posts: 8,790
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by expmler View Post
I equate gun control with people control.

They train the police, which are part of the general population. Why couldn't you or I be trained the same.
Woohoo I have a giant win ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑ ↑↑↑↑↑
My whole point for going on four yearz. Omg
  #372  
Old 04-06-2014, 07:23 PM
expmler expmler is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lizard Lake, SK.
Posts: 2,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish gunner View Post
Woohoo I have a giant win ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑ ↑↑↑↑↑
My whole point for going on four yearz. Omg
Both shootings at Fort Hood were perpetrated by highly trained military people.
  #373  
Old 04-06-2014, 07:29 PM
nelsonob1's Avatar
nelsonob1 nelsonob1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Nelson BC
Posts: 2,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by expmler View Post
I equate gun control with people control.

They train the police, which are part of the general population. Why couldn't you or I be trained the same.
Yes, I would agree it is about controlling people who can demonstrate the skill and acumen to have guns. I don't see any reason why that would be limited to police. If you had the same training I would feel comfortable.
  #374  
Old 04-06-2014, 07:41 PM
Matt L.'s Avatar
Matt L. Matt L. is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Whitecourt
Posts: 5,818
Default

So we must control the people FG? Hmm, where have I heard that before?
  #375  
Old 04-06-2014, 07:58 PM
nelsonob1's Avatar
nelsonob1 nelsonob1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Nelson BC
Posts: 2,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L. View Post
So we must control the people FG? Hmm, where have I heard that before?
Everyone agrees on some control, the debate is how much. I personally like Canada's regulatory framework. I can honestly say I'm OK with about 80% of it but I originate from Europe where the gun and hunting regs are seriously restrictive. I couldn't believe my luck when I came to Canada. Take a simple, sensible test, buy a rifle and go hunt a colossal sized deer for the price of a tag. YAHOO! I now spend nine months a year dreaming about the other three.

However, when it comes to using guns for self defense I am cautious. One presumes that they would be used in self defence but when under that kind of duress it takes a certain type of individual and a high degree of skill to control the situation. Possible for sure, but not common IMO.

I don't like the idea of just the police being trained and armed. I do like the idea of some of that responsibility being shared with the public. That would be healthy for both the community and the police.

As to the idea any wing nut should carry at any location for any reason. That's a scary place I would not want to habit.
  #376  
Old 04-06-2014, 08:06 PM
fish gunner fish gunner is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a mishn for fishn.
Posts: 8,790
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L. View Post
So we must control the people FG? Hmm, where have I heard that before?
No I was more on the training thing , no so big on control .
  #377  
Old 04-06-2014, 08:06 PM
Ryry4's Avatar
Ryry4 Ryry4 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Olds, Alberta, Canukistan.
Posts: 5,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L. View Post
So I'm willing to bet that a bunch of you anti-gun folks are in favour of the Toronto police chiefs wanting to have all guns locked up in a central armoury where you have to come in and sign them out if they feel like letting you that day?
That seems to be working well for England.
__________________


Don't argue with a fool, he'll bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.

Life Member of:
Wild Sheep Foundation Alberta
Wild Sheep Foundation
NRA

  #378  
Old 04-06-2014, 08:11 PM
Ryry4's Avatar
Ryry4 Ryry4 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Olds, Alberta, Canukistan.
Posts: 5,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nelsonob1 View Post
As to the idea any wing nut should carry at any location for any reason. That's a scary place I would not want to habit.
Criminals will carry at any location regardless of the law. You say you love the ability to acquire a gun here and hunt, yet there are others hunting at the same time as you carrying a firearm. Do they fall into the "wing nut" category that scares you so much?

I hope you never set foot in Montana, Idaho, Arizona, Utah or a whole other list of US states. You'd be scared out of your mind.
__________________


Don't argue with a fool, he'll bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.

Life Member of:
Wild Sheep Foundation Alberta
Wild Sheep Foundation
NRA

  #379  
Old 04-06-2014, 08:20 PM
fish gunner fish gunner is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a mishn for fishn.
Posts: 8,790
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryry4 View Post
Criminals will carry at any location regardless of the law. You say you love the ability to acquire a gun here and hunt, yet there are others hunting at the same time as you carrying a firearm. Do they fall into the "wing nut" category that scares you so much?

I hope you never set foot in Montana, Idaho, Arizona, Utah or a whole other list of US states. You'd be scared out of your mind.
No doubt with nearly 50% of firearms owners holding criminal records . What are the protecting them selves from other wise ???? Roughly 25× more lightly to die from a gun shot in AZ than canada. How can that be ??? If what you say is correct
  #380  
Old 04-06-2014, 08:54 PM
BeeGuy BeeGuy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish gunner View Post
No doubt with nearly 50% of firearms owners holding criminal records . What are the protecting them selves from other wise ???? Roughly 25× more lightly to die from a gun shot in AZ than canada. How can that be ??? If what you say is correct
All I hear are crickets...
  #381  
Old 04-06-2014, 08:57 PM
hal53's Avatar
hal53 hal53 is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lougheed,Ab.
Posts: 12,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeeGuy View Post
All I hear are crickets...
all I hear is somebody making up stats ...yet again.....
__________________
The future ain't what it used to be - Yogi Berra
  #382  
Old 04-06-2014, 08:59 PM
hillbillyreefer's Avatar
hillbillyreefer hillbillyreefer is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish gunner View Post
No doubt with nearly 50% of firearms owners holding criminal records . What are the protecting them selves from other wise ???? Roughly 25× more lightly to die from a gun shot in AZ than canada. How can that be ??? If what you say is correct
Got anything to back that up or are you just spewing crap out of thin air?
__________________
Upset a Lefty, Fly a Drone!

"I find it interesting that some folk will pay to use a range, use a golf course, use a garage bay but think landowners should have to give permission for free. Do these same people think hookers should be treated like landowners?" pitw
  #383  
Old 04-06-2014, 09:06 PM
norwestalta norwestalta is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hythe
Posts: 4,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gust View Post
I'll just not venture into the woods when I know that bears are at their orneriest nor will I take a short cut through a crack neighbourhood a week before welfare checks come out.
Imo you'll pack a gun for wildlife protection where the chances are much slimmer of a animal attack then a crime committed against you or your loved ones.
  #384  
Old 04-06-2014, 09:06 PM
marxman's Avatar
marxman marxman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,853
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish gunner View Post
Lol
Ha ha ha
  #385  
Old 04-06-2014, 09:08 PM
BeeGuy BeeGuy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hal53 View Post
all I hear is somebody making up stats ...yet again.....
I never said how many crickets I heard.

I just wrote that was all I could hear.

How about some common sense???
  #386  
Old 04-06-2014, 09:08 PM
expmler expmler is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lizard Lake, SK.
Posts: 2,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish gunner View Post
No doubt with nearly 50% of firearms owners holding criminal records . What are the protecting them selves from other wise ???? Roughly 25× more lightly to die from a gun shot in AZ than canada. How can that be ??? If what you say is correct
Here's some reading for you, BeeGuy and GUST. I hope you can comprehend it.

http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/...useronline.pdf
  #387  
Old 04-06-2014, 09:11 PM
fish gunner fish gunner is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a mishn for fishn.
Posts: 8,790
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by hillbillyreefer View Post
Got anything to back that up or are you just spewing crap out of thin air?
Ohhh the boring boring jumpers in find BB's link and G 's prior link five pages back or so . Then say sorry.
  #388  
Old 04-06-2014, 09:18 PM
Burglecut83 Burglecut83 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,003
Default

Fish fear you like you fear guns gummer
  #389  
Old 04-06-2014, 09:20 PM
BeeGuy BeeGuy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burglecut83 View Post
Fish fear you like you fear guns gummer
Such a profound statement.
  #390  
Old 04-06-2014, 09:23 PM
hal53's Avatar
hal53 hal53 is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lougheed,Ab.
Posts: 12,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeeGuy View Post
I never said how many crickets I heard.

I just wrote that was all I could hear.

How about some common sense???
don't think I mentioned anything about what you could or could not hear...nice try though.....you are on a roll yet again, one that I will not participate in
__________________
The future ain't what it used to be - Yogi Berra
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.