Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 06-03-2011, 02:59 PM
Deb's Avatar
Deb Deb is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 251
Default

I understand BlackHeart's point of view, but shouldn't the health, safety and lives of the folks who have the arduous task of rescue and recovery also be considered?

http://www.calgaryherald.com/busines...209/story.html
__________________
.... once you get past all the superficial crap, the rest is gravy
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-03-2011, 07:20 PM
huntsfurfish huntsfurfish is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deb View Post
I understand BlackHeart's point of view, but shouldn't the health, safety and lives of the folks who have the arduous task of rescue and recovery also be considered?

http://www.calgaryherald.com/busines...209/story.html
Yup/agree
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-03-2011, 09:12 PM
BlackHeart's Avatar
BlackHeart BlackHeart is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,003
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deb View Post
[LEFT]I understand BlackHeart's point of view, but shouldn't the health, safety and lives of the folks who have the arduous task of rescue and recovery also be considered?
Not sure I can respond with the right words concepts...but I will try.

Your comment is sort of like having all your fireman afraid of fires.

Training, equipment, practice, knowledge of techniques, and THAT IS THEIR JOB, is what I am thinking of.

Risk is inherent in anything we do.....even icefishing or laying in the sun.

If we all stayed safe, their would be no need for them and the training....pretty boring being a fireman paid to play floor hockey only.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-03-2011, 09:39 PM
chubbdarter's Avatar
chubbdarter chubbdarter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: cowtown
Posts: 6,653
Default

I believe all emergency personel are trained to respond to Accidents and minimize loss the best they can.
I also believe its not anyones job to risk their lives for fooktards . If your warned not to do something and still do it....is it still a accident?

just my opinion
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-03-2011, 10:14 PM
horsetrader horsetrader is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 4,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chubbdarter View Post
I believe all emergency personel are trained to respond to Accidents and minimize loss the best they can.
I also believe its not anyones job to risk their lives for fooktards . If your warned not to do something and still do it....is it still a accident?

just my opinion
no it's not an accident it's an ASSident
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-06-2011, 06:35 AM
FishingMOM FishingMOM is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,599
Default *still closed*

The city is reminding people that all waterways are closed. Including the resevoir.

Body of female found in the glenmore.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 06-06-2011, 09:35 AM
Toirtis's Avatar
Toirtis Toirtis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FishingMOM View Post
The city is reminding people that all waterways are closed. Including the resevoir.

Body of female found in the glenmore.
Combine that with rain forecast for the next 3-5 days, and I do not see the ban being lifted any time before the 12th.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 06-06-2011, 11:02 AM
shorty_j shorty_j is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Default

While I might not have worded it the same way, Blackheart makes a lot of good points. I understand that the rivers are dangerous right now, if you don't know what you're doing, but I don't think the city knows enough about me and my river skills to know that I can't handle myself on the cities rivers.

Some people actually want the rivers to run high and that's exactly when they want to be on those rivers, and I don't understand where the city gets off telling them they can't do this. They are reacting to the actions of some people without enough knowledge to keep themselves safe in and around the rivers and painting all of with the same brush of assumptions. If they were truly interested in education about safety, for the same amount of money and effort they could be providing information about the state of the rivers (possibly along with a mention that the rivers are too dangerous for them to conduct rescue efforts) rather than banning all river travel and fining people for "violating" that ban.

I respect the Calgary Fire Department (I have two friends on the force), but I feel like this ban is an over-reaction, and blanket reactions like this don't serve the citizens of Calgary the way the FD thinks it should. For instance, the Elbow is still much higher than normal right now, but it is WELL below what it was last week. And even more informative, the levels on the Bow are actually within normal variation of water levels. Fish Creek is also back down to normal range.

http://environment.alberta.ca/apps/b...ionID=RELBGLEN
http://environment.alberta.ca/apps/b...ionID=RBOWCALG
http://environment.alberta.ca/apps/b...ionID=RFISHPRI

A blanket ban on all rivers seems to be not very well thought out, and a potentially negative side-effect of this is that anyone who is interested in travelling on these rivers can deduce this information for themselves just by looking at the river, and that person may not heed warnings in the future in situations that are possibly more dangerous.

It is my opinion that bans like this, which are becoming more common in Alberta (for example, liquor bans at campgrounds on long weekends), are a concerning trend regarding our personal freedoms. There is an alarming pattern of people telling me what I can't do before I've even demonstrated that I will cause a problem, and if this pattern continues I will become more concerned about what kind of restrictions on my choices will be made by people other than me. I'm all for safety and education, but it doesn't have to go this far.

I also looked into the bylaw under which the FD is allowed to make this ban, and I had it emailed to me in pdf format. I don't have an internet link to post, but if anyone is interested in reading it, pm me and I will gladly email it to you.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-06-2011, 12:39 PM
Urban Nightmare Urban Nightmare is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 47
Default

I agree with you for the most part. I like camping. I enjoy a single (one not a dozen) beer while grilling the steaks while camping. The problem is that to many people have gotten them selves in to trouble either drinking to much or going out on the river where they don't have the experience. There is not a test out there to know who is qualified and who isn't. And yes you usually can only get the experience by doing, I understand that. What it comes down to is the police and FD don't want to risk their lives for someone else's stupidity. We as a society don't have the will to just say "Your on your own." and let them kill them selves (Won't someone please think of the children). We live in a nanny state. Even the USA is moving this direction whether they like it or not. The "You can't do that" people are louder then the "Its my right" people. The politicians are only doing what we tell them to and once a law is on the books it's almost impossible to take it off. Especially if the general consensus is that it "works".
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-06-2011, 12:45 PM
shorty_j shorty_j is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Nightmare View Post
...There is not a test out there to know who is qualified and who isn't. And yes you usually can only get the experience by doing, I understand that. What it comes down to is the police and FD don't want to risk their lives for someone else's stupidity. We as a society don't have the will to just say "Your on your own." and let them kill them selves (Won't someone please think of the children)...
True, but the same justification is not used to tell people they are not allowed to drive on city streets in a really bad snowstorm... just education and a recommendation. I'm sure car accidents in bad weather cause more physical casualties, financial cost, and burden on emergency responders.

I understand what you are trying to say, though.

--------------

On another note, I actually called the Calgary FD and ended up speaking to their public relations guy and had a nice long chat. Basically there are levels at which the Bow and Elbow get closed (270 cms for the Bow, and 60 cms for the Elbow). They didn't re-open them because they're expecting more rain.

I think the ban loses credibility when the don't react to their own guidelines because of what "might" happen next week, and they would be better off removing and applying the ban more frequently as conditions change. I mentioned that to the FD on the phone. He was receptive to some of my points but I'm not sure if anything will come of it.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 06-06-2011, 12:56 PM
Urban Nightmare Urban Nightmare is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shorty_j View Post
True, but the same justification is not used to tell people they are not allowed to drive on city streets in a really bad snowstorm... just education and a recommendation. I'm sure car accidents in bad weather cause more physical casualties, financial cost, and burden on emergency responders.

I understand what you are trying to say, though.
Give it a bit more time. The biggest reason they haven't yet is because they can't shut down commerce. The oil still needs pumping. An I dare you to tell any of the executives at the major companies down town (in any city) that they have to take public transit! Speaking of which. There isn't enough buses and trains to move that many people when a snow/rain/ice storm is happening. Those are the days I tell my boss I'm working from home, then roll over and get another couple of hours
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-06-2011, 01:19 PM
GaryF GaryF is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 178
Default

For those of you that are educated in river safety and have common sense, yes the ban is an intrusion on your rights. But for Joe Q stupid public, which makes up about 98% of the population, its needed. I work in construction and did a project for shell canada last year upgrading thier gas stations for an energy saving project. Big signs and lots of red danger tape, and ppl would still ignore it all and just walk into danger. I didn't realize how blatently stupid humans are until I did that work. The ban isn't there to trampel on your rights, but to keep the other 98% of ppl, hopefully, away from danger.
__________________
Enjoying the peace and serenity of this wonderful sport!!
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-06-2011, 02:21 PM
southernman southernman is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Fort Mc Murray/ Bell Block New Zealand.
Posts: 861
Default

I used to do a lot of whitewater kayaking, got to be very good at it, ran rivers and waterfalls and flooded rivers few others would. When I started out I had very little respect for the power of water in its relentless persuit for the sea. That quickley changed.
Do you realise that a skilled kayaker can run white water no other craft can, including rescue and jet boats.
I ended up working as kayak rescue for several rafting companys. that was an eye opener,
I feel that the nanny state keeping everyone safe, will in the long run bring about more and more idiots, more rescues as fewer people will be able to take a caulated risk.
If kids don't learn the pain from the small mistakes (ie climbing up the slide and Falling of bashing face, falling out of a tree cause it wasn't strong enough, They are removing trees and playgrounds from some schools now.) How in the heck will they know what is risky when they start driving, climbing, river and lake outdoor activies.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-06-2011, 05:26 PM
shorty_j shorty_j is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southernman View Post
I feel that the nanny state keeping everyone safe, will in the long run bring about more and more idiots, more rescues as fewer people will be able to take a caulated risk.
I completely agree with this. The more the state makes these decisions for us in the form of bans, the less able we are as a society to actually use our own brains to make intelligent choices.

This is the kind of thing that leads people to sue a group because that group failed to protect them from themselves (rather than the individual taking responsibility for educating and preparing themselves). We are opening a can of worms.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-07-2011, 11:38 AM
Gust Gust is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,408
Default

Dropped by Carseland on the way back from fishin the other day,, the river was high and fast and smelled like fermented septic tank poo (had the great oportunity of rebuilding a tank once),, and by the looks of it, the weir at one point would have only been a couple of feet out of the water.

Boulders as big as minivans were no longer part of the shoreline on sections of the sheep, so my guess is that the rivers where we think we know them are now no more decipherable than the Nile.

Passed the Highwood in a couple of sections yesterday and an hour later at the same spots it appeared higher. The water isn't exactly the type where you'll get to shore quickly and even if you do, you'll be battling a nasty case of Ghardia (<sp?) in other words, your sphincter will take an unexpected holiday while your at the mall seeking out some line dancing cd's in your famous white denims.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 06-07-2011, 12:13 PM
Photoplex's Avatar
Photoplex Photoplex is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GustavMahler View Post
in other words, your sphincter will take an unexpected holiday while your at the mall seeking out some line dancing cd's in your famous white denims.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-07-2011, 12:22 PM
Toirtis's Avatar
Toirtis Toirtis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 735
Default

Well, since the ban was effected, the river has dropped about 24cm/9" and 140 cm/s...and despite the provincial flow advisory being rescinded days ago, the ban still stood a couple of hours ago when I called to get an update.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-07-2011, 12:45 PM
Gust Gust is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toirtis View Post
Well, since the ban was effected, the river has dropped about 24cm/9" and 140 cm/s...and despite the provincial flow advisory being rescinded days ago, the ban still stood a couple of hours ago when I called to get an update.
But not siding with the ban (but kinda,, I didn't like the law last week but kinda like it now),, the run off isn't like run offs of back yonder, swift and clear but more like swift Capucino with a fine grating of chocolate for garnish.
Undercuts are still dropping in the river and new embankments aren't firm.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-07-2011, 01:58 PM
FishBrain FishBrain is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,904
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GustavMahler View Post
But not siding with the ban (but kinda,, I didn't like the law last week but kinda like it now),, the run off isn't like run offs of back yonder, swift and clear but more like swift Capucino with a fine grating of chocolate for garnish.
Undercuts are still dropping in the river and new embankments aren't firm.
and there is a WHACK of people beside the river on the south side of the calf robe bridge. Wonder if they are learning to save the stupid, or if they are learning to NOT be stupid?
__________________
A wise fellow once told me "Stop playing with it so much, or it might fall off!"

I still lose bait that way.


UPS will fondle your animals!!
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-07-2011, 03:05 PM
Calgarys_finest Calgarys_finest is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: AIRDRIE
Posts: 53
Default

Out of curiosity can i call any fire department location or should i be calling a specific number?

also what about tributaries?
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 06-07-2011, 03:17 PM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarys_finest View Post
Out of curiosity can i call any fire department location or should i be calling a specific number?

also what about tributaries?
Wouldn't one of Calgary's Finest know the answer to that?

Wait a minute... you never did say finest what. LOL
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 06-07-2011, 03:27 PM
shorty_j shorty_j is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarys_finest View Post
Out of curiosity can i call any fire department location or should i be calling a specific number?

also what about tributaries?
Another thing I found out in my calls to the FD yesterday was that there isn't really a central place where this information is easily checked, and the best way to find out about it is to look at the city of calgary news feed...

http://newsroom.calgary.ca/pr/calgary/news.aspx

The article to institute the perimeter ban is on page 2 from May 28th. The fact that there is no update indicating that the ban has been lifted is supposed to be enough information for us. Really stupid. The guy I spoke to said when the ban is lifted they will announce it, so you can expect it to be on the news.

You could try calling the FD, but it took me a number of transfered calls to actually put me through to someone who knew the answers to my questions.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 06-07-2011, 07:16 PM
zabbo's Avatar
zabbo zabbo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: calgary
Posts: 1,548
Default

Just leave them alone! Let nature do it's job!
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 06-07-2011, 08:28 PM
Toirtis's Avatar
Toirtis Toirtis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zabbo View Post
Just leave them alone! Let nature do it's job!
I tend to agree...we have legislated common sense, thereby side-stepping natural selection.

That aside, you can call the FD main office at 403-264-1022.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 06-07-2011, 09:20 PM
Ruger1022's Avatar
Ruger1022 Ruger1022 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,733
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aulrich View Post
One of the selling points of the new "wier" system was that it was to be used for white water kayaking and now that the water is well into the fun zone they go and shut it down.

The bubble wrappers strike again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy View Post
Yesterday when we were driving SB on Deerfoot, I saw 5 kayakers playing around at the weir. Crazy guys.
And I also saw some construction workers working on the river bank under the 10th street bridge. They were on a path about 3 feet wide. One stumble and they would have been swimming.
http://watch.discoverychannel.ca/dai...11/#clip445025
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 06-07-2011, 10:02 PM
Daceminnow's Avatar
Daceminnow Daceminnow is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruger1022 View Post

very cool piece on the construction at the weir on the Bow. fish WILL have easier access up river, no doubt. thanks for the link ruger.

Dace
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 06-07-2011, 10:12 PM
Ruger1022's Avatar
Ruger1022 Ruger1022 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,733
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daceminnow View Post
very cool piece on the construction at the weir on the Bow. fish WILL have easier access up river, no doubt. thanks for the link ruger.

Dace
No problem! I am excited for this to be done, for the fishing and the surfing!! I usually have to go to K-Country for surfing but now there will be some in the heart of Calgary!!

Here is somemore info
http://www.parksfdn.com/Weir.htm



The right side is a expert side but the left side will be more of a slower go for the leisure rafters.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 06-07-2011, 11:21 PM
ishootbambi ishootbambi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: medicine hat
Posts: 9,037
Default

a few have alluded to it already.......we as a society really need to stop interfering with darwin!
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 06-08-2011, 12:00 AM
chubbdarter's Avatar
chubbdarter chubbdarter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: cowtown
Posts: 6,653
Default

before the suckers used to stack up by the hundreds below that weir, not able to get over it.
A high percentage of browns spawn in the zoo area.
I will be very interested how this development affects the brown trout population
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 06-09-2011, 12:23 PM
marlin1's Avatar
marlin1 marlin1 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,085
Default

the river ban has been lifted , according to last night's news
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.