|
06-02-2018, 08:35 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
|
|
35x300rum
I've made a decision that I'm gonna rebarrel my rem 700 xcr11 to a 35x300rum. Would a 26" barrel be optimal and what twist rate would I be wanting?
|
06-02-2018, 08:51 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,854
|
|
I would go no longer than 23”.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”
-Billy Molls
|
06-02-2018, 09:22 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
|
|
Any reason chuck?
|
06-02-2018, 11:02 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,257
|
|
What application are you considering ?
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
|
06-02-2018, 12:24 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salavee
What application are you considering ?
|
Near and far plain ol smacking things
|
06-02-2018, 02:02 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Black Dually
Posts: 259
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwest Alta
Any reason chuck?
|
I'd guess that the expansion ratio of that cartridge would be a major factor. Don't need the extra barrel volume because the powder is all burnt up by then. Plus I'd be more concerned with the handling characteristics for smacking near things in brushy areas. Good luck with the build that sounds like a beast!
|
06-02-2018, 02:05 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,854
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulcousin
I'd guess that the expansion ratio of that cartridge would be a major factor. Don't need the extra barrel volume because the powder is all burnt up by then. Plus I'd be more concerned with the handling characteristics for smacking near things in brushy areas. Good luck with the build that sounds like a beast!
|
That’s pretty much it.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”
-Billy Molls
|
06-02-2018, 02:46 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,161
|
|
The resulting cartridge would be similar to the 360 Imperial Magnum which existed as part of the Imperial Magnum line of cartridges. There is some reloading data on line that should provide a good starting point. The 360 Magnum rifles were sold with 26" barrels, and they did produce enough extra velocity over the 24" test barrels, that I would go 26", if I built one.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Last edited by elkhunter11; 06-02-2018 at 02:52 PM.
|
06-02-2018, 04:33 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwest Alta
I've made a decision that I'm gonna rebarrel my rem 700 xcr11 to a 35x300rum. Would a 26" barrel be optimal and what twist rate would I be wanting?
|
Awesome call imo
|
06-06-2018, 11:38 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinky Coyote
Awesome call imo
|
Just dropped it off. Going with a 26" shillen barrel. Should be a gooder.
|
06-06-2018, 01:03 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 68
|
|
What bullets are you thinking? There's a 225 accubond, 225 barnes tipped tsx. Likely wanting a 12 twist?
|
06-06-2018, 01:40 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Central Alberta
Posts: 8,315
|
|
In most cases, there is a direct relationship between barrel length and velocity, with longer barrels producing higher velocities ... however, there is a point of diminishing benefit. It is my understanding that virtually all the powder is burned within a few inches of the chamber but the hot gas produced continues to expand, which is then then the driving force behind the bullet. Is my understanding correct?
__________________
Old Guys Rule
|
06-06-2018, 02:11 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
|
|
Ruby the gun Smith has built a few of them. I more or less left it to him except with the reminder that it is my money he's spending. Lol. I would like to shoot Barnes.
260 the smith said that a 26" barrel will work very well with 100grs of powder being burnt.
|
06-06-2018, 02:25 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,257
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 260 Rem
In most cases, there is a direct relationship between barrel length and velocity, with longer barrels producing higher velocities ... however, there is a point of diminishing benefit. It is my understanding that virtually all the powder is burned within a few inches of the chamber but the hot gas produced continues to expand, which is then then the driving force behind the bullet. Is my understanding correct?
|
I believe it is peak pressure that is reached within 3-5 inches, not 100 % powder burn. Depending on the burn rate, powder continues to burn, sometimes even after the bullet has exited the barrel, but ideally, a few inches prior to exit. Immediately after peak pressure, velocity continues to increase due to the expanding gasses. After projectile acceleration decreases to a pressure equal the projectiles resistance, a rapid deceleration rate begins due primarily to barrel friction. Interestingly, in most cases, all this happens within 2 milliseconds .
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
|
06-06-2018, 03:18 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,875
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwest Alta
Just dropped it off. Going with a 26" shillen barrel. Should be a gooder.
|
Bang on and good choice,you will enjoy it more than you think,best of luck.
JD
|
06-06-2018, 04:16 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD848
Bang on and good choice,you will enjoy it more than you think,best of luck.
JD
|
Thanks
It’ll be hard to give it a chance because of my ol faithful 338 wm but I’m looking forward to it. Should be done for a reasonable price as well because I told him that I’m in no hurry. Figured he might be able to find a barrel on sale if we wait. The muzzle brake I’ve got will work. He just has to open it up. Figured the xcr action shouldn’t need any blueprinting but would have to change the feed ramp angle.
Gotta decide now what I’ll use for optics. The original scope is a bushnell 6500 2.5-16 x42. I’m not a big bushnell fan. I’ve also got a minox 5-20x50 that might work fairly nice to see the fur fly.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:40 PM.
|