|
07-07-2018, 05:48 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1
|
|
reloading 7mag & 160 barnes
any good recipes:
|
07-07-2018, 06:05 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Blackfalds
Posts: 6,945
|
|
While not quite the same load, I was using 150gr TTSX with H1000 and IMR4831 and I couldn’t get the velocities I wanted with those powders. I switched to 120gr and got a very good group with very good velocity.
|
07-07-2018, 06:37 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 132
|
|
What bullet type was the 120? I really like the TTSX bullets.
|
07-07-2018, 11:49 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Blackfalds
Posts: 6,945
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by weekender7
What bullet type was the 120? I really like the TTSX bullets.
|
Still TTSX.
Less BC but I can drive them faster for better expansion.
|
07-08-2018, 12:45 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,447
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiabeticKripple
While not quite the same load, I was using 150gr TTSX with H1000 and IMR4831 and I couldn’t get the velocities I wanted with those powders. I switched to 120gr and got a very good group with very good velocity.
|
Try IMR7828SSC or just 7828 with the 150 TTSX if you have it. Velocities approaching 3200fps with great groups in my Sako
|
07-08-2018, 06:14 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,116
|
|
R-22 or IMR7828 both work well, but I prefer a lighter TTSX in the 7mmremmag, to keep the velocity higher, for better expansion. The 140gr TTSX is my favorite, if it shoots well in the rifle.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
|
07-08-2018, 06:18 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Blackfalds
Posts: 6,945
|
|
I can’t remember the exact velocity off the top of my head, and I’ve only shot 1 5 shot group with the 120gr, but it was sub-moa at over 3300fps.
I’m going to load up another batch Monday and see if I can repeat it.
|
07-12-2018, 12:51 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 242
|
|
TTSX or LRX
Pertinent threat for myself
I've shot Factory Loaded Barnes VOR-TX in 7mm Rem Mag 160 gr in the TSX bullet.
I have been on this round more or less since the load was released commercially.
Generally a good performing bullet however I shot a bull elk this year, had a pass through with no expansion evident.
This is at least the second time I have had no expansion with this round.
Considering moving to a TTSX bullet for the tip, as supposedly most people see more reliable expansion with this design.
Anyways - considering dropping to the 150 or even 140 grain TTSX in factory loaded
OR
Moving to the new 168gr LRX bullet (this means I would have to hand load).
I use this rifle for deer and elk/moose - looking for a single purpose load.
|
07-12-2018, 05:43 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,586
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11
R-22 or IMR7828 both work well, but I prefer a lighter TTSX in the 7mmremmag, to keep the velocity higher, for better expansion. The 140gr TTSX is my favorite, if it shoots well in the rifle.
|
The 140gr pill seems to be made for the 7mm calibres, keeps the velocity up, expands great and kinda brings the cartridge all together or some might say completes it.
__________________
Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:13 PM.
|