Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 03-07-2018, 08:22 AM
walker1 walker1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fordtruckin View Post
All this talk about overloading makes me feel I need a 1 ton diesel just to pull my 3500-4000# camper...
Go to RV.net and you will be told YOU need a dually!!!! HAHA


Never heard anyone claim they had too much truck but have SEEN the opposite every time on the road camping.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 03-07-2018, 09:03 AM
fordtruckin's Avatar
fordtruckin fordtruckin is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: In the woods
Posts: 8,923
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JB_AOL View Post
Don't feel that way.. do your homework and you'll be fine. Most people assume weights of everything.. go to a weight scale, and get the actual weight of your camper. It really is eye opening.
I know I’m just being sarcastic. For what I pull and how often I pull it a half ton will be more then adequate. Yes a 1 ton would be great but the added expense of everything it entails would not be worth it for my application.
__________________
I feel I was denied, critical, need to know Information!
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 03-07-2018, 09:43 AM
walker1 walker1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fordtruckin View Post
I know I’m just being sarcastic. For what I pull and how often I pull it a half ton will be more then adequate. Yes a 1 ton would be great but the added expense of everything it entails would not be worth it for my application.
Your combo is great. Don't need overkill for sure.

In general I find the 150 and 1500 rating to be way too high ( especially with towing a brick..... RV!) The HD pickups for the most part are underrated (GVWR, warranty issues). But, overloaded is overloaded.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 03-07-2018, 09:53 AM
CptnBlues63 CptnBlues63 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere north of Edmonton
Posts: 616
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale S View Post
I'm updating my 08 F350. I've been thinking of getting a F150 with the 3.5 ecoboost. I pull a 2500lbs boat every weekend. I also pull a few times a year a 22ft fifth wheel. Not long hauls 2 hours max. A few times a year I pull my fifth wheel and boat at the same time. I know I wouldn't be able to do this with a F150 so I would have to make 2 trips. A f350 would be nice, but if I can pull a single load with a f150 with no problems I might go smaller.
I have a 2013 F150. We ordered it from the factory with the tow package. If memory serves me it's rated to pull 10,000 or a little over that.

I have 24' trailer that loaded weighs about 9000 lbs give or take a bit depending on how many clothes my wife packs. I put 8500 km's on it in June of 2016 when we went down to Oregon then over to Mt Rushmore and back up here to Northern, AB. I do a yearly trip to Portland, OR with that trailer to see my daughter and grandson that encompasses between 3000 and 4000 km's.

I've done the trip with a V8 (F150) and the new boosted 6 cylinder. Both pulled the 24' trailer beautifully and I've been through the Rockies and up the Coquihalla a few times so it's had to work hard on quite a few occasions.

FWIW, my 16' boat pulls like it's not even there and barely bumps the mileage up 1 liter per 100 km (if that).

Here's my advice..............If you're going to haul a trailer a lot, go with the V8 or get an F250/350. If like me, you do 80-90% of your driving without a trailer, then the V6 is a good choice as you get great gas mileage running empty. It definitely uses a lot more with a load than empty but then so does a V8. The difference between empty and loaded mileage is bigger on the V6 (ergo my advice).
__________________
It matters not how straight the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll,
I am master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.

***William Henley***
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 03-07-2018, 12:42 PM
calgarygringo calgarygringo is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: calgary
Posts: 3,006
Default

Dont forget that 10k lbs is a mark for licence issues and fuel ratings. If they stay below rates ad small truck over 10k moves them up with the big boys. Especially the half and 3/4 tons just a game they play to hit the mark.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 03-07-2018, 07:54 PM
DOGFISH's Avatar
DOGFISH DOGFISH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Fort Saskatchewan
Posts: 733
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sewerrat View Post
I tow our 24' no problem, and even our 24' sailboat. and I love my egoboost. In the past I had a GMC with a 6L and pulling a fifthwheel I spend more time at the fuel station than camping.

When towing with any kind of truck be prepared that the fuel economy goes for $++T.
I am guessing the Ford has a larger fuel tank as most 6l GM's have a 90 liter fuel tank which is too small for a towing vehicle.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 03-07-2018, 08:07 PM
Taco Taco is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Claresholm, Ab
Posts: 4,022
Default

136 litres nowadays the older trucks had the dinky 85 litre fuel tank
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 03-07-2018, 08:35 PM
Robmcleod82's Avatar
Robmcleod82 Robmcleod82 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,798
Default

We bought my wife a 2017 f150 ecoboost last year. We replaced her 2005 gmc 2500 with a 6.0. We got the max tow and max payload packages, which forced us into the ecoboost as I wanted the 5 L. Zero complaints the truck has blown my mind. We tow a fifthwheel horse trailer thats 9000 pounds with horses (Weighed on the scales) and it hauls and stops it every bit as well or better than the 6.0 did. The fuel mileage towing is better than the 6.0 was empty. Hauling my boat (2500lbs ish) you dont even know it is there and the fuel mileage is pretty close to when its empty. We went with the half ton because most of the time its my wifes daily driver and i didnt want her wearing out a diesel running around town. I think the biggest thing you give up going with the half ton is the full floating axles. Its amazing that we could tow anything with the 1 tons of 15 years ago........
__________________
"I don't know about the "shooting Savages" part. I have one and I have had considerable difficulty doing well with it. Part of the reason for this is that I feel a need to put bag over my head to hide my identity when ever I am shooting it!"
Leeper
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 03-07-2018, 09:00 PM
SinisteR SinisteR is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 38
Default

I had a 2012 3.5 ecoboost fx4 with max tow and 6.5 ft box. Pulled a 30ft starcraft holiday trailer weighing 8400 lbs all over during the summer. Hauled all the way to Kelowna and back from Edmonton 2 years ago when daytime temps were 33* average in bc. Tow rating was 11200 lbs. Towed the trailer really well including in the mountains. All weights were legal unless i had too much stuff (600 lb+) in the box, Then I was over on rear axle only but overall weight was still fine. Had good 10 ply tires on though, mad a huge difference. With the factory p rated pirelli scorpion garbage tires it was very mushy.

Just bought a 2018 3.5 ecoboost max tow 6.5 again. Now im good for 13000 lb tow rating and 18400 gcwr. Payload is better as well, plus with lighter truck weight I should be able to pile all the crap in the box I want.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 03-07-2018, 11:37 PM
Coho911's Avatar
Coho911 Coho911 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Calgary
Posts: 509
Default

I double checked mine and my 2013 Ecoboost, 4x4 Supercrew with:
3.73 rear end and Max Tow Package (#7650 lbs)
Stock Ford transmission cooler
Stock Goodyear Wrangler SR/A's (but heavy towing rated from Ford) - NOW have Goodyear Wrangler Adventures - E rated with WAY overkill sidewalls and towing rating way over what I need.

My chart from Ford shows my rating at

GCVW @ 17,100,
Trailer max @ 11,200

Stock Ford transmission cooler
Stock Goodyear Wrangler SR/A's (but heavy towing rated from Ford) - NOW have Goodyear Wrangler Adventures - E rated with WAY overkill sidewalls and towing rating way over what I need.

I have pulled a 28' (30' overall) 8000 pound trailer for vacations and aside from a little bit of extra gas burned, it was like a little tractor. No problems keeping up with highway traffic, great braking, trailer control computer in winds is a MUST HAVE - corrects truck and trailer line with braking and traction control - AMAZING.

When driving the truck as a commuter on the highway, I usually get between 11.2 L/100 km (Goodyear SR-A tires, great low rolling resistance) and 12.4 L/100 km (Goodyear Wrangler Adventures - quiet, stiff bouncy ride form the stiff sidewalls and waaaaay lower rolling resistance, but better for what I need off pavement). But with a warranty of 90,000 kms - very worth it.
__________________
Yes - I am a leather worker. (just ask)
FIVE Leather, Calgary AB
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 03-08-2018, 08:49 AM
reddeerguy2015 reddeerguy2015 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SinisteR View Post
I had a 2012 3.5 ecoboost fx4 with max tow and 6.5 ft box. Pulled a 30ft starcraft holiday trailer weighing 8400 lbs all over during the summer. Hauled all the way to Kelowna and back from Edmonton 2 years ago when daytime temps were 33* average in bc. Tow rating was 11200 lbs. Towed the trailer really well including in the mountains. All weights were legal unless i had too much stuff (600 lb+) in the box, Then I was over on rear axle only but overall weight was still fine. Had good 10 ply tires on though, mad a huge difference. With the factory p rated pirelli scorpion garbage tires it was very mushy.

Just bought a 2018 3.5 ecoboost max tow 6.5 again. Now im good for 13000 lb tow rating and 18400 gcwr. Payload is better as well, plus with lighter truck weight I should be able to pile all the crap in the box I want.
18,400 gcwr!?

Half ton??

I dare you to tow 13k with a f150 (kidding - don't).

I've got a 2009 dodge ram 3500 mega cab dually that has a gcwr of around 18,500 - so the same as your f150. I know which id prefer with 12k behind me.

That's just an accident waiting to happen.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 03-08-2018, 09:40 AM
walker1 walker1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reddeerguy2015 View Post
18,400 gcwr!?

Half ton??

I dare you to tow 13k with a f150 (kidding - don't).

I've got a 2009 dodge ram 3500 mega cab dually that has a gcwr of around 18,500 - so the same as your f150. I know which id prefer with 12k behind me.

That's just an accident waiting to happen.

I agree. That is the problem with the 1500 and 150 ratings. The GCWR keeps going up but the truck is getting lighter so the math works........... but soon the tail is wagging the dog!!!!

Imagine the truck weight around 6500 pounds with hitch weight and the trailer pushing 11 -12000. Dangerous.

Even the HD need a balance. When my 350 has toyhauler hooked truck grosses 11500 (pin weight on truck is (2800-3000) and trailer comes in around 11500-13000 depending on garage loading which actually takes weight of the pin. A 50/50 or 40/60 balance and makes for nice towing in all conditions.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 03-08-2018, 12:36 PM
Suzukisam Suzukisam is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 564
Default

Hey walker what you talking about the new ford echo only weighs 4900lbs fully loaded quad cab. Now what you think
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 03-08-2018, 12:37 PM
calgarygringo calgarygringo is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: calgary
Posts: 3,006
Default

What ia the payload capacity on a tow rating like that? Just curious what they are at. My guess is that may be the kicker unless they have really beefed them up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coho911 View Post
I double checked mine and my 2013 Ecoboost, 4x4 Supercrew with:
3.73 rear end and Max Tow Package (#7650 lbs)
Stock Ford transmission cooler
Stock Goodyear Wrangler SR/A's (but heavy towing rated from Ford) - NOW have Goodyear Wrangler Adventures - E rated with WAY overkill sidewalls and towing rating way over what I need.

My chart from Ford shows my rating at

GCVW @ 17,100,
Trailer max @ 11,200

Stock Ford transmission cooler
Stock Goodyear Wrangler SR/A's (but heavy towing rated from Ford) - NOW have Goodyear Wrangler Adventures - E rated with WAY overkill sidewalls and towing rating way over what I need.

I have pulled a 28' (30' overall) 8000 pound trailer for vacations and aside from a little bit of extra gas burned, it was like a little tractor. No problems keeping up with highway traffic, great braking, trailer control computer in winds is a MUST HAVE - corrects truck and trailer line with braking and traction control - AMAZING.

When driving the truck as a commuter on the highway, I usually get between 11.2 L/100 km (Goodyear SR-A tires, great low rolling resistance) and 12.4 L/100 km (Goodyear Wrangler Adventures - quiet, stiff bouncy ride form the stiff sidewalls and waaaaay lower rolling resistance, but better for what I need off pavement). But with a warranty of 90,000 kms - very worth it.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 03-08-2018, 01:45 PM
walker1 walker1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suzukisam View Post
Hey walker what you talking about the new ford echo only weighs 4900lbs fully loaded quad cab. Now what you think
4900 ( stripped down base model XLT only) plus 1000-1200 hitch weight..........

Truck would be more like 5200-5800.

6500 or more with hitch and occupants. Higher trim even more.
The 4900 scenario you mention make the dog tail even happier!!!!!! make it even worse!!!!

That shows another issue. People go by brochure curb weight. A 4900 pound brochure XLT is easily 500 -700 more in lariat or higher trim levels........even with the lighter aluminum.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 03-08-2018, 06:53 PM
SinisteR SinisteR is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 38
Default

I definitely dont intend to tow to the max rating. Got pretty heavy overall on the 2012 when I had the Zebec boat, 20hp motor, gas cans, a generator, firewood, propane tank, plus random crap in the box. Plus wife and kids in truck with the trailer loaded up. It actually towed pretty well. Lots of power and braking. Big key is a trailer that is balanced well and a good equalizer hitch set up properly. Tail would wag the dog a bit with the crap tires but was nice with the 10 ply toyo ct's.

I would recommend using one to tow on a casual basis for sure. I towed maybe 10% to 15% of total mileage. If i got over 40% I would maybe consider something bigger. Just be sure to check the owners manual/door labels to make sure you have the right set up for the weight. I had to factory order the 2012 and the 2018 was a hard find to get it right. Without the right gear ratio or payload setup the ratings drop considerably. 90% of the ones on a dealer lot are meant to haul groceries and drive to the spa. City trucks made for fuel economy. Do your research.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 03-08-2018, 07:39 PM
Suzukisam Suzukisam is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 564
Default

You guys better go to fords site and look at 2018 specs. A f150 king ranch super crew weight is 2235 kg. With the 3.5 echo The new truck is really light. And look at the lariat f350 quad 3300 kg

Last edited by Suzukisam; 03-08-2018 at 07:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 03-08-2018, 09:18 PM
guru fisher guru fisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 406
Default

My tundra pulls like a diesel. Amazing how good it pulls but 25 + liters per 100 k
Once a big loads on
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 03-08-2018, 10:17 PM
HyperMOA HyperMOA is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton (shudder)
Posts: 4,636
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guru fisher View Post
My tundra pulls like a diesel. Amazing how good it pulls but 25 + liters per 100 k
Once a big loads on
I didn’t realize the Tundra’s were making 925 ft lbs of torque. My kudos to Toyota. Very impressive. Does your tundra also handle, brake, retard, and carry like said diesel? Or just pull like a diesel? I’m very interested in this Tundra; what trim model do you have that competes with a diesel?
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 03-09-2018, 05:29 AM
Dale S Dale S is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,842
Default

This truck has to last me into retirement. You guys on here have confirmed what my thoughts were on the 3.5 ecoboost. I just don't think the 3.5 will last 10 years of pulling. I've decided on the F350 Lariat. Anyone interested in a 08 f350 just under 300000on truck and 130000 on the crate motor. I have all the bills for the new motor and oil changes every 5000km.

Last edited by Dale S; 03-09-2018 at 05:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 03-09-2018, 06:35 AM
calgarygringo calgarygringo is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: calgary
Posts: 3,006
Default

Tundra motors are great and pull well but look at the payload of the trucks they are not even close to a Ford. Pretty easy to overload them with a decent weight trailer and gear.


Quote:
Originally Posted by HyperMOA View Post
I didn’t realize the Tundra’s were making 925 ft lbs of torque. My kudos to Toyota. Very impressive. Does your tundra also handle, brake, retard, and carry like said diesel? Or just pull like a diesel? I’m very interested in this Tundra; what trim model do you have that competes with a diesel?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 03-09-2018, 08:27 AM
sako1 sako1 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hypermoa View Post
i didn’t realize the tundra’s were making 925 ft lbs of torque. My kudos to toyota. Very impressive. Does your tundra also handle, brake, retard, and carry like said diesel? Or just pull like a diesel? I’m very interested in this tundra; what trim model do you have that competes with a diesel?
lol
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 03-09-2018, 09:00 AM
walker1 walker1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suzukisam View Post
You guys better go to fords site and look at 2018 specs. A f150 king ranch super crew weight is 2235 kg. With the 3.5 echo The new truck is really light. And look at the lariat f350 quad 3300 kg

You are posting weight from a ford website and brochure. That is curb weight. It is not accurate.

A f 350 lariat weighs over 8000 pounds without fuel. I had a 2012 and now a 2017 and even with the aluminum there is a 7 pound difference. I weigh at scales. The 350 you quote is the gasser and weighs 700 pounds less.

Anyone with a 2018 f150 want to post a pic of the yellow sticker for payload?
GVWR subtract payload equals true truck weight.

I had a 150 that weighed 6250 pounds . 2010 lariat

Last edited by walker1; 03-09-2018 at 09:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 03-09-2018, 09:15 AM
walker1 walker1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale S View Post
This truck has to last me into retirement. You guys on here have confirmed what my thoughts were on the 3.5 ecoboost. I just don't think the 3.5 will last 10 years of pulling. I've decided on the F350 Lariat. Anyone interested in a 08 f350 just under 300000on truck and 130000 on the crate motor. I have all the bills for the new motor and oil changes every 5000km.
Smart man! Diesel or 6.2 gasser?
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 03-09-2018, 09:17 AM
walker1 walker1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygringo View Post
Tundra motors are great and pull well but look at the payload of the trucks they are not even close to a Ford. Pretty easy to overload them with a decent weight trailer and gear.

4 guys and their golf clubs max out the tundra payload .
They pull good but don't carry much.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 03-09-2018, 06:40 PM
Dale S Dale S is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,842
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by walker1 View Post
Smart man! Diesel or 6.2 gasser?
I'm goin with the (450hp, 935lb-ft) 6.7 diesel.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 03-10-2018, 02:50 PM
Suzukisam Suzukisam is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 564
Default

Smart and safest choice. You saved yourself an expensive lessen
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 03-12-2018, 08:49 AM
walker1 walker1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale S View Post
I'm goin with the (450hp, 935lb-ft) 6.7 diesel.
Great choice!!!

You will be smiling often. Love my 2017 platinum. My 2012 was a horse too but braking is so much better since the turbos were redesigned in 2015.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.