Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-18-2018, 09:42 PM
RolHammer RolHammer is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 799
Default SPFGA Update - holsters & steel core now banned

The SPFGA Executive voted at the November meeting to prohibit holster use effective immediately. Excepted from this prohibition are black powder pistols, cowboy action shooting, and uniformed law enforcement personnel.

Additionally, effective September 1, 2019, steel core ammunition will be banned from all SPFGA ranges. A delay has been implemented to this prohibition to allow members to deplete steel core ammunition they may have already purchased.

If there are concerns or questions regarding this, please contact us at rifle@spfga.ca.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-18-2018, 09:57 PM
lannie lannie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CNP
Posts: 3,760
Default

Not part of the club but I am curious as to why Holster use is prohibited?
__________________
You are what you do, not what you say.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-18-2018, 10:02 PM
RolHammer RolHammer is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lannie View Post
Not part of the club but I am curious as to why Holster use is prohibited?
Hi lannie - please go ahead and contact rifle@spfga.ca regarding that.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-19-2018, 07:55 AM
bobtodrick bobtodrick is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,939
Default

Gotta admit, in the near 10 years I've been a member the only people I've seen using holsters are the aforementioned blackpowder/action shooters and the LE teams when they book a range.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-19-2018, 08:17 AM
darren32's Avatar
darren32 darren32 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,015
Default

Surprised no exemption for IPSC.
No IPSC members? or just not enough to care?
(I am not a SPFGA member either)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-19-2018, 08:36 AM
Jack Hardin Jack Hardin is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,103
Default

Back when the Olds range was open, they prohibited holster use except for current and former police officers. They said that they are the only ones that are properly trained to carry a handgun in a holster......balderdash! If a non LEO takes the holster course, what is the problem?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-19-2018, 09:19 AM
fish_e_o fish_e_o is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: rollyview
Posts: 7,860
Default

good thing i'm black badge
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-19-2018, 09:21 AM
darren32's Avatar
darren32 darren32 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish_e_o View Post
good thing i'm black badge
So is every IPSC member but he didn't say that was an exception .....
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-19-2018, 09:23 AM
fish_e_o fish_e_o is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: rollyview
Posts: 7,860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darren32 View Post
So is every IPSC member but he didn't say that was an exception .....
i would say black badge would take precedence
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-19-2018, 11:46 AM
darren32's Avatar
darren32 darren32 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish_e_o View Post
i would say black badge would take precedence
Doesn't sound like it.

http://www.ipscalberta.com/forum/gen...fish-game.html
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-19-2018, 11:49 AM
RolHammer RolHammer is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish_e_o View Post
i would say black badge would take precedence
I regret to report that it does not. If you are a member fish_e_o, I encourage you to contact us at rifle@spfga.ca for more information.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-19-2018, 12:18 PM
cody j cody j is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sunset House
Posts: 1,256
Default

No holsters? What about someone taking their proof of proficiency test for an ATC?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-19-2018, 12:40 PM
AI 6.5 AI 6.5 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Edmonton/San Tan Valley,Arizona
Posts: 801
Default

What about LEO’s working in a plainclothes capacity? Seems odd to have handgun range but not allowed to wear a holster? Rather than replying to a pm, maybe explain the rationale so people can understand it. It could definitely influence a persons decision to apply for a membership or not.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-19-2018, 12:48 PM
ghostguy6's Avatar
ghostguy6 ghostguy6 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: edmonton
Posts: 3,116
Default

Why is it always SPFGA that seems to be making headlines for having the strictest rules? There was a time I had submitted an application to the range but now I'm glad I was denied because the range had already reached capacity. Starting to sound like that place is under communist rule.
__________________
" Everything in life that I enjoy is either illegal, immoral, fattening or causes cancer!"

"The problem was this little thing called the government and laws."
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-19-2018, 12:51 PM
ren008 ren008 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 391
Default

Gotta keep the wanna-be "operators" and SKS crowds out somehow I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-19-2018, 12:52 PM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 15,049
Default

I am a member. Don't ever use a holster. Just got the notice from the club. Am not for or against the new rule but in any club with elected executive I think it is important to provide the rational for why decisions are being made that affect the membership. A tersely worded notice is not sufficient and reflects poorly on leadership. I do plan to talk to a couple of people about this poor style of communication.

Quote:
Holster Use Prohibited

The SPFGA Executive voted at the November meeting to prohibit holster use effective immediately. Exempted from this prohibition are black powder pistols, cowboy action shooting, and uniformed law enforcement personnel.
Additionally, effective September 1, 2019, steel core ammunition will be banned from all SPFGA ranges. A delay has been implemented to this prohibition to allow members to deplete steel core ammunition they may have already purchased.
If there are concerns or questions regarding this, please contact us at rifle@spfga.ca.

Regards,
The SPFGA Executive
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-19-2018, 01:11 PM
fish_e_o fish_e_o is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: rollyview
Posts: 7,860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AI 6.5 View Post
What about LEO’s working in a plainclothes capacity?
not allowed at spfga
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-19-2018, 01:16 PM
Trochu's Avatar
Trochu Trochu is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,655
Default

Are people shooting themselves in the foot/leg? What could be the possible rational behind this?

I don't own a holster, so am kinda asking from left field.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-19-2018, 01:35 PM
fish_e_o fish_e_o is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: rollyview
Posts: 7,860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ren008 View Post
Gotta keep the wanna-be "operators" and SKS crowds out somehow I guess.
we should all group together and rage quit
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-19-2018, 01:49 PM
bat119's Avatar
bat119 bat119 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: On the border in Lloydminster
Posts: 8,364
Default

Our range banned holsters a few years ago I just assumed they don't want any John Wick imitators shooting themselves in the foot or my foot.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-19-2018, 01:55 PM
CNP's Avatar
CNP CNP is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: WMU 303
Posts: 8,493
Default

When not in use, handguns belong in holsters.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-19-2018, 02:42 PM
RolHammer RolHammer is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean2 View Post
I am a member. Don't ever use a holster. Just got the notice from the club. Am not for or against the new rule but in any club with elected executive I think it is important to provide the rational for why decisions are being made that affect the membership. A tersely worded notice is not sufficient and reflects poorly on leadership. I do plan to talk to a couple of people about this poor style of communication.
That falls entirely on my head, Dean. Please feel free to contact me at website@spfga. I would be happy to talk with you.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-19-2018, 02:51 PM
darren32's Avatar
darren32 darren32 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RolHammer View Post
That falls entirely on my head, Dean. Please feel free to contact me at webchair@spfga. I would be happy to talk with you.
Just curious, why would you post this topic on a public forum then ask people to contact you privately? I realize only SPFGA members are entitled to the reasoning but if there is going to be no discussion publicly it makes no sense, members were notified privately.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-19-2018, 02:59 PM
RolHammer RolHammer is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darren32 View Post
Just curious, why would you post this topic on a public forum then ask people to contact you privately? I realize only SPFGA members are entitled to the reasoning but if there is going to be no discussion publicly it makes no sense, members were notified privately.
It’s an important matter & we wanted to be sure we’d reached as many members as quickly as possible.

It’s unorthodox I’ll admit, but getting the information about the change out was important enough to warrant being unorthodox.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-19-2018, 03:01 PM
darren32's Avatar
darren32 darren32 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RolHammer View Post
It’s an important matter & we wanted to be sure we’d reached as many members as quickly as possible.

It’s unorthodox I’ll admit, but getting the information about the change out was important enough to warrant being unorthodox.
OK, fair enough, thanks for the reply.

EDIT: It's working, lots of bumps today

Last edited by darren32; 11-19-2018 at 03:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-19-2018, 03:32 PM
lannie lannie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CNP
Posts: 3,760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish_e_o View Post
we should all group together and rage quit
Democratically get on the executive and change things the way the majority wants. Might actually be there now.
__________________
You are what you do, not what you say.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-19-2018, 03:52 PM
cranky cranky is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,464
Default

I remember we couldnt use holsters way back early 1990's at the Phoenix range. Never used any other range so didnt realize it wasnt standard rules for all ranges.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-19-2018, 03:58 PM
darren32's Avatar
darren32 darren32 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cranky View Post
I remember we couldnt use holsters way back early 1990's at the Phoenix range. Never used any other range so didnt realize it wasnt standard rules for all ranges.
I know what you are getting at but just for clarity, you can still use holsters at Phoenix, just need black badge.



Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-19-2018, 04:55 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,129
Default

At my previous range, no firearms are allowed forward of the firing line, except during special events where a range officer is present. I had to remind a few people, including off duty RCMP officers wearing holstered firearms of this. Oddly enough, I never saw anyone attempt to carry a firearm forward of the firing line, unless it was holstered.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-19-2018, 05:27 PM
sailor sailor is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Posts: 997
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trochu View Post
Are people shooting themselves in the foot/leg? What could be the possible rational behind this?

I don't own a holster, so am kinda asking from left field.
Being IPSC member don’t remember any of us shoot himself in leg.
From the other hand there were 2 known publicly accidents in 2018 of LEO that shoot themselves in leg.
So it isn’t wise to allow them use holsters either
__________________
you know I prefer to shoot off hand
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.