Quote:
Originally Posted by wind drift
I think you’re barking up the wrong tree. ACA won’t aerate a lake that prone to chinook effects. The signage and fencing they need around the aerator doesn’t work when the open water area changes so much and is unpredictable, and they won’t aerate without signage and fencing because of liability. I dont think letters to fisheries bios or a hatchery manager will sway the ACA off their position in the face of legal risk and risk to safety.
|
Wind…
Gotta agree, rather than using the wind shadow like they did at Hassee, they parked the aeration unit where the wind was the strongest and then to compound the stupid, surround it with a fence designed to break the wind. The best part, they wondered why the wing blew the fence down.
Guess they didn’t want to do the aeration.
What is surprising, the previously used aeration units utilizing the pre-existing electrical supply was not used.
Don
Threaded Mode
