Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

View Poll Results: Would you support the introduction of a bass fishery to Alberta.
Yes 201 52.34%
No 183 47.66%
Voters: 384. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 04-07-2011, 03:13 PM
tallieho tallieho is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: calgary
Posts: 1,216
Default

my vote would me NO BASS
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 04-07-2011, 03:47 PM
pickrel pat pickrel pat is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,268
Default

never fished em and never will! grew up with limited fishing shows to watch and got plain sick of watching bass fisherman and there 40 lb line reel in a 10lb bass from 30 yards out in 2.4 seconds! not sure why those americans on t.v insist on horseing them in like that.?.?.? and when its all said and done (2.4 seconds later ) they say " wow! that was a hell of a fight! " that reason and the big reason. incase peaple havnt noticed, but our fish managment isnt that awsome. we are still "experimenting" with the existing species we have. once we learn how to manage the existing fisherys and waterbodys, then and only then should we take on new species etc. etc. But first things first my fellow fishermen!
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 04-07-2011, 03:52 PM
whitetail Junkie's Avatar
whitetail Junkie whitetail Junkie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AB
Posts: 6,638
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pickrel pat View Post
never fished em !
Sorry for your loss,you dont know what your missing!

Ive caught every bass in canada,rock,black,largemouth,small Mouth ,Etc pound for pound they fight like no other Fresh water Fish in canada.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 04-07-2011, 03:54 PM
pickrel pat pickrel pat is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitetail Junkie View Post
Sorry for your loss,you dont know what your missing!

Ive caught every bass in canada,rock,black,largemouth,small Mouth ,Etc pound for pound they fight like no other Fresh water Fish in canada.
read the rest. it explains my reasoning.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 04-07-2011, 04:25 PM
Sundancefisher's Avatar
Sundancefisher Sundancefisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary Perchdance
Posts: 18,775
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pickrel pat View Post
never fished em and never will! grew up with limited fishing shows to watch and got plain sick of watching bass fisherman and there 40 lb line reel in a 10lb bass from 30 yards out in 2.4 seconds! not sure why those americans on t.v insist on horseing them in like that.?.?.? and when its all said and done (2.4 seconds later ) they say " wow! that was a hell of a fight! " that reason and the big reason. incase peaple havnt noticed, but our fish managment isnt that awsome. we are still "experimenting" with the existing species we have. once we learn how to manage the existing fisherys and waterbodys, then and only then should we take on new species etc. etc. But first things first my fellow fishermen!
I agree...I can't stand watching bass fishing on TV... 400lb test...holding them in the air for 1 hour with their jaw bent...then tossing them back...
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 04-07-2011, 04:51 PM
Isopod Isopod is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 464
Default

In 1908, bass were stocked in Lake Minnewanka, and into Sylvan, Gull, Pine, Buffalo and Cooking Lakes. In 1924, bass were introduced into Ministik Lake, near Edmonton. A few years later largemouth bass were stocked in Pigeon Lake, Lake Wabamun and Lac La Nonne. They survived and were caught for several years, but never reproduced. Smallmouth were introduced into Island Lake (near Smoky Lake) in 1977,1978,1979,1981 and 1984. The largest one caught by angling was 43 cm long and weighed 1.8 kg. In 1989, young bass were caught, indicating some reproduction. Not sure when the last one was caught, but there is no longer any sign of reproduction or survival.

So it isn't for lack of trying, they just don't seem to make it here. As much as I would love to have a local bass fishery, it would be a put and take fishery at best, and there are better species for that.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 04-07-2011, 05:09 PM
grinr grinr is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SW Cowgree
Posts: 1,810
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitetail Junkie View Post
Sorry for your loss,you dont know what your missing!

Ive caught every bass in canada,rock,black,largemouth,small Mouth ,Etc pound for pound they fight like no other Fresh water Fish in canada.
FYI,LM and SM are both black bass. I agree,pound for pound they are like no other.They lack endurance and spirit and are weak compared to a trout or salmon of equal size,which you would know if you'd ever caught so much as a single trout or salmon of comparable size,bwaahahahaha. Thanks for sharing your vast wealth of freshwater angling knowledge and experience with the forum though.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 04-07-2011, 05:24 PM
chubbdarter's Avatar
chubbdarter chubbdarter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: cowtown
Posts: 6,653
Default

I respectfully am in shock over the poll results.
I have definitely learned something.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 04-07-2011, 05:30 PM
huntsfurfish huntsfurfish is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chubbdarter View Post
I respectfully am in shock over the poll results.
I have definitely learned something.
CD, what did you learn?
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 04-07-2011, 05:32 PM
pickrel pat pickrel pat is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huntsfurfish View Post
CD, what did you learn?
he learned that roughly ignorance holds 49% of the forum population! bwahahahah! kidding of course. am i?. lol.
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 04-07-2011, 05:38 PM
chubbdarter's Avatar
chubbdarter chubbdarter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: cowtown
Posts: 6,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huntsfurfish View Post
CD, what did you learn?
that no matter the cost or what scientific proof says...people still want what they want....and thats fair

a put and take Bass fishery just doesnt seem feasble to me
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 04-07-2011, 05:50 PM
huntsfurfish huntsfurfish is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
Default

Dont think you will have to worry about that(put and take bass) anytime soon.

Highly unlikely SRD will ever allow new species into the Province.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 04-07-2011, 06:02 PM
chubbdarter's Avatar
chubbdarter chubbdarter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: cowtown
Posts: 6,653
Default

im not against anyones idea of pleasure....thats their choice.
here is a idea.....totally a simple mans idea...no science or accounting done

a lousy movie costs 20 bucks each now if you dont eat too much
a specialty coffee costs 8 bucks
a stinking bottle of water 3 bucks
a Mac-Chit meal 9 bucks

How many fisherman are willing to pay 250 bucks for a annual licence?
250 bucks that goes to the fisheries and not the save a crack head foundation
Maybe some realistic dreams can come true with that kind of funding.
Its my opinion the price to fish here is Good bang for your Buck....really cheap in fact.
As in life...we all want want want....but want costs money. Wanting and not willing to pay is kinda like whinning with your hand out

Last edited by chubbdarter; 04-07-2011 at 06:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 04-07-2011, 06:07 PM
pickrel pat pickrel pat is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chubbdarter View Post
im not against anyones idea of pleasure....thats their choice.
here is a idea.....totally a simple mans idea...no science or accounting done

a lousy movie costs 20 bucks each now if you dont eat too much
a specialty coffee costs 8 bucks
a stinking bottle of water 3 bucks
a Mac-Chit meal 9 bucks

How many fisherman are willing to pay 250 bucks for a annual licence?
250 bucks that goes to the fisheries and not the save a crack head foundation
Maybe some realistic dreams can come true with that kind of funding.
Its my opinion the price to fish here is Good bang for your Buck....really cheap in fact.
i dont get out much anymore,( 2-3 times a year ) but if it made a differance i would pay it.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 04-07-2011, 06:09 PM
chubbdarter's Avatar
chubbdarter chubbdarter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: cowtown
Posts: 6,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pickrel pat View Post
i dont get out much anymore,( 2-3 times a year ) but if it made a differance i would pay it.
im guilty of going too many times...maybe guys like me should pay more
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 04-07-2011, 06:15 PM
crown royal 17's Avatar
crown royal 17 crown royal 17 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Slave Lake
Posts: 216
Default

No take care of our fishery .
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 04-07-2011, 06:34 PM
Kokanee9's Avatar
Kokanee9 Kokanee9 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,769
Default

I am shocked also by the results. I never imagined that a bass fishery would be wanted here.
When I put up the poll I was thinking it would be 80/20 or maybe 70/30 with the majority going against the intro.
If bass were to be introduced, would I try fishing for them? Sure I would, even though I voted against the intro. How many other people would also cast a line for them that voted against it?
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 04-07-2011, 06:43 PM
grinr grinr is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SW Cowgree
Posts: 1,810
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huntsfurfish View Post
CD, what did you learn?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pickrel pat View Post
he learned that roughly ignorance holds 49% of the forum population! bwahahahah! kidding of course. am i?. lol.
Not kidding at all.....I was shocked to discover that Big Brother actually DOES know what's best for us and that almost half of the public is not educated enough on the subject to make responsible decisions for themselves.

Last edited by grinr; 04-07-2011 at 07:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 04-07-2011, 09:54 PM
Sundancefisher's Avatar
Sundancefisher Sundancefisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary Perchdance
Posts: 18,775
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chubbdarter View Post
that no matter the cost or what scientific proof says...people still want what they want....and thats fair

a put and take Bass fishery just doesnt seem feasble to me
Is 163 votes enough to convince you?

Granted people are interested in something new...something different...

Unfortunately...it is highly unlikely we can find a large enough lake that people would let us pound the pike and walleye in to protect the bass. Not feasible...but still an interesting concept...

Tiger trout lakes would be way cooler...and also bringing the Splake back...
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 04-08-2011, 09:58 AM
Gust Gust is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,408
Default

Here are the 85 votes missing from the low vote on the Quality Trout fishing poll, I'm kidding.

But I side with Picky Pat and Sunprance; nothing worse than years ago having bass fishing shows from South Carolina ponds enclosed on PGA golf courses. Seriously, the boats always had 2x250hp, probably to compensate for the weight of 3 fishermen who weighed as much as 10 people. If I could get over the stereotype of what we can expect from a bass fishing clique, then I might give it a whirl,,, long sigh,,,, nope just writing that made me cringe,,, I'll consider watching bass fishers from afar for anthropological reasons. How about garfish, they look fun or land locked salmon or pufferfish,, mmmm Fugu sounds like it could give walleye a run for it's money in taste. Hell, let's just have all the freshwater fish in North America, right here, NOW. BUT, if it's the change the people want, I think I can learn how to chew tobacco and get my girth on.
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 04-08-2011, 10:16 AM
horsetrader horsetrader is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 4,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GustavMahler View Post
Here are the 85 votes missing from the low vote on the Quality Trout fishing poll, I'm kidding.

But I side with Picky Pat and Sunprance; nothing worse than years ago having bass fishing shows from South Carolina ponds enclosed on PGA golf courses. Seriously, the boats always had 2x250hp, probably to compensate for the weight of 3 fishermen who weighed as much as 10 people. If I could get over the stereotype of what we can expect from a bass fishing clique, then I might give it a whirl,,, long sigh,,,, nope just writing that made me cringe,,, I'll consider watching bass fishers from afar for anthropological reasons. How about garfish, they look fun or land locked salmon or pufferfish,, mmmm Fugu sounds like it could give walleye a run for it's money in taste. Hell, let's just have all the freshwater fish in North America, right here, NOW. BUT, if it's the change the people want, I think I can learn how to chew tobacco and get my girth on.
WELL that was well worth waiting for...this thread has officially run aground.......
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 04-08-2011, 07:29 PM
chubbdarter's Avatar
chubbdarter chubbdarter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: cowtown
Posts: 6,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by horsetrader View Post
WELL that was well worth waiting for...this thread has officially run aground.......
donnied and maried?
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 04-08-2011, 07:46 PM
greylynx greylynx is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 12,078
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Isopod View Post
In 1908, bass were stocked in Lake Minnewanka, and into Sylvan, Gull, Pine, Buffalo and Cooking Lakes. In 1924, bass were introduced into Ministik Lake, near Edmonton. A few years later largemouth bass were stocked in Pigeon Lake, Lake Wabamun and Lac La Nonne. They survived and were caught for several years, but never reproduced. Smallmouth were introduced into Island Lake (near Smoky Lake) in 1977,1978,1979,1981 and 1984. The largest one caught by angling was 43 cm long and weighed 1.8 kg. In 1989, young bass were caught, indicating some reproduction. Not sure when the last one was caught, but there is no longer any sign of reproduction or survival.

So it isn't for lack of trying, they just don't seem to make it here. As much as I would love to have a local bass fishery, it would be a put and take fishery at best, and there are better species for that.
Please read the above facts.

What interests me is the new demand for Bass in Alberta.

Are you posters who demand another failed bass stocking in Alberta people who lived in eastern Canada or somewhere in the United States, and figure that if Bass lived in ontario and USville why not in Alberta?

Please note that I am not trying to insult any of you people, but am wondering what demographic you are coming from?
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 04-08-2011, 08:05 PM
npauls's Avatar
npauls npauls is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta
Posts: 4,060
Default

If you don't stock most of the trout lakes a couple times of year they would all fail also. So why not take a few of those lakes and turn them into small bass lakes. It doesn't have to be all over the province just a few in each region to give it some change. I can live with having to go to BC a couple times of year to fish for them but it would be nice to have something a bit different then what else is around here already.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 04-08-2011, 08:19 PM
Dust1n Dust1n is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 4,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundancefisher View Post
I agree...I can't stand watching bass fishing on TV... 400lb test...holding them in the air for 1 hour with their jaw bent...then tossing them back...
finaly someone who also hates bass fishing shows. its not only that saying a 2lb fish is 4-5lbs? like do they think were dumb? or mabe they think it looks bigger holding it up to the camera
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 04-08-2011, 08:35 PM
chubbdarter's Avatar
chubbdarter chubbdarter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: cowtown
Posts: 6,653
Default

hardly no one answered my question....who's willing to pay for all this?

maybe we can buy bass for a experiment e.g Island Lake
But to have even a few Bass lakes as put and take we need a Bass rearing facility...$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.....millions! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And its over my DEAD cold body the funding is coming out of the Cold Lake hatchery!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...the fish reared there have and are showing signs of natural reproduction after being released.

Just because we dont stock 15 put and take trout ponds does not give us the funding to build and operate a Bass rearing facility......geebuss..it would be cheaper to give all Albertans who want to fish Bass 4 all expense paid week ends in Creston a year.

Im all for educated experiments......but im against bashing my head against a wall i could not defeat the first 10 attempts.

250.00 bucks a year for a annual licence anyone?......no begging no whinning no praying....just plain be big boys and pay up
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 04-08-2011, 08:42 PM
WayneChristie's Avatar
WayneChristie WayneChristie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 12,772
Default

[QUOTE=chubbdarter;899202]

Just because we dont stock 15 put and take trout ponds does not give us the funding to build and operate a Bass rearing facility......geebuss..it would be cheaper to give all Albertans who want to fish Bass 4 all expense paid week ends in Creston a year.

Sign me up!!!! with a side trip to the Kokanee brewery
__________________
Dinos
681

Shove your masks and your vaccines
Non Compliance!!!!!!
"According to Trudeau, Im an extremist who needs to be dealt with"
#Trudeau must go

Wheres The Funds

The vaccine was not brought in for COVID. COVID was brought in for the vaccine. Once you realize that, everything else makes sense.” ~ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 04-08-2011, 08:44 PM
Dust1n Dust1n is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 4,306
Default

no ones payying for it. and if it is part of its going to taxes, some of it going to our anuel win cards and fishing lincenses. and stiffer fines. and if we do get them say good buy to our put and take trout fisherys. no more decent tasting trout. now it will be muddy meat. but weve tried stokcing lakes they dont survive...it just dont work that way.
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 04-08-2011, 09:08 PM
npauls's Avatar
npauls npauls is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta
Posts: 4,060
Default

I would be all for paying the $250 for a license every year if I knew that all of the money was going back into the fishery and not lining the pockets of the politicians.

Couldn't you buy the bass from an out of province hatchery and use the money saved from not stocking the lakes all with rainbows Darter? I don't know how the whole stocking thing works but I thought that could possibly be an option.
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 04-08-2011, 09:32 PM
GaryF GaryF is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 178
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by npauls View Post
I would be all for paying the $250 for a license every year if I knew that all of the money was going back into the fishery and not lining the pockets of the politicians.
Agreed!
__________________
Enjoying the peace and serenity of this wonderful sport!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.