Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2017, 06:19 AM
Unregistered user Unregistered user is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ^v^Tinda wolf^v^ View Post
I'm opposed to working longer before retirement but I'm all for a national childcare program. As it stands for my family to have another child and put him or her in day care we would be looking at a bill just shy of $2000 a month. Sure there are cheaper rates such as day homes but one never knows what exactly goes on. Day cares have regulated standards.
Hell no! How about a real tax break for families that have a stay at home parent? Best for the kids and best for everyone else.
__________________
Former Ford Fan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-26-2017, 06:25 AM
Newview01 Newview01 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered user View Post
Hell no! How about a real tax break for families that have a stay at home parent? Best for the kids and best for everyone else.
That would encourage a healthy family atmosphere, which we know is not the goal anymore in Western society. The traditional family must disappear.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-26-2017, 06:40 AM
badbrass badbrass is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,781
Default RRSP Tax

Just a little tidbit! Just going through this with a passing of a family member!
If you and your spouse were in a car wreck, and both killed. The government
takes 48% right off the top of your RRSP's!
No Questions asked. Then the rest is split in the estate.
I will be getting rid of my RRSP's Before anything else
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-26-2017, 07:53 AM
chedder's Avatar
chedder chedder is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by badbrass View Post
Just a little tidbit! Just going through this with a passing of a family member!
If you and your spouse were in a car wreck, and both killed. The government
takes 48% right off the top of your RRSP's!
No Questions asked. Then the rest is split in the estate.
I will be getting rid of my RRSP's Before anything else
Ultra rare that both spouses die at same time but yes, if the rrsp amount puts you over $200,000 income in year you die big tax bill ensues. But, that's what life insurance is for if that's a an issue.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-27-2017, 09:50 AM
Big Grey Wolf Big Grey Wolf is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,284
Default

Just another concern with your TFSA and RRSp's etc Who do you give the money to, I trust bankers about as much as lawyers. Will the $$$ be their when you want to draw it out. I like to keep my retirement money in 2-3 banks so maybe some will be their when I try to cash it out.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-27-2017, 10:41 AM
lmtada's Avatar
lmtada lmtada is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Grey Wolf View Post
Just another concern with your TFSA and RRSp's etc Who do you give the money to, I trust bankers about as much as lawyers. Will the $$$ be their when you want to draw it out. I like to keep my retirement money in 2-3 banks so maybe some will be their when I try to cash it out.

Ontario Health care workers fund (government) bailing out Housing Home Mortgage.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-0...althcare-worke

Watch where your $$ retirement money is invested. It might be gone.

And in case you are one of the 321,000 retirees who are nervous about your pension managers' actions, don't worry: The loan is secured by a pool of mortgages originated by Home Trust, and as everyone knows, in Canada home prices never go down.

How is this even possible? Conflict?
As Bloomberg reports, the Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP) is the lender behind Home Capital Group’s C$2 billion loan ($1.5 billion) to shore up liquidity, citing people familiar with the matter.

HOOPP President and Chief Executive Officer Jim Keohane sits on Home Capital’s board and is a shareholder.


Last edited by lmtada; 04-27-2017 at 11:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-27-2017, 10:55 AM
bat119's Avatar
bat119 bat119 is online now
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: On the border in Lloydminster
Posts: 8,377
Default

In the oil crunch most company's retired workers over 55 allowing the younger workers to keep their jobs. Losing your job 7-8 years before your planned retirement date can be a crushing blow, there are thousands of people in the same position with the same job skills looking for jobs. Years ago you could pull your retirement early supplementing your income with a part time job now all these jobs are filled by the new Canadians. Retiring at 67 sounds good if your job lasts that long.
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-27-2017, 05:08 PM
lmtada's Avatar
lmtada lmtada is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,091
Default

Bailout, and conflict of Interest? Wonder if Ontario Health care workers know what Investors are utilizing there retirement funds for? From low risk to high risk, overnight.

https://shar.es/1F7M6P

Sent using ShareThis


Sent from my iPad


Quote:
Originally Posted by lmtada View Post
Ontario Health care workers fund (government) bailing out Housing Home Mortgage.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-0...althcare-worke

Watch where your $$ retirement money is invested. It might be gone.

And in case you are one of the 321,000 retirees who are nervous about your pension managers' actions, don't worry: The loan is secured by a pool of mortgages originated by Home Trust, and as everyone knows, in Canada home prices never go down.

How is this even possible? Conflict?
As Bloomberg reports, the Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP) is the lender behind Home Capital Group’s C$2 billion loan ($1.5 billion) to shore up liquidity, citing people familiar with the matter.

HOOPP President and Chief Executive Officer Jim Keohane sits on Home Capital’s board and is a shareholder.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-27-2017, 10:40 AM
Mike_W's Avatar
Mike_W Mike_W is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 6,433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by badbrass View Post
Just a little tidbit! Just going through this with a passing of a family member!
If you and your spouse were in a car wreck, and both killed. The government
takes 48% right off the top of your RRSP's!
No Questions asked. Then the rest is split in the estate.
I will be getting rid of my RRSP's Before anything else
Well its not quite like that as taxes are paid on a graded schedule but if someone earns over $300,000 in a year everything over $303,900 would be taxed at 48%.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-27-2017, 06:37 PM
badbrass badbrass is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_W View Post
Well its not quite like that as taxes are paid on a graded schedule but if someone earns over $300,000 in a year everything over $303,900 would be taxed at 48%.
Not to sure about that, Both financial adviser and lawyer said the same. They also said, no one ever tell them the facts about when this happens.
Even a fellow I knew, when his wife passed on and moved her RRSP's
over it cost him 35% of her RRSP's to the government.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.