Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 08-18-2023, 06:24 PM
H380's Avatar
H380 H380 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WMU 108
Posts: 6,309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bessiedog View Post
Well….. I get that it is an incidental
Fishery….. but the regulations….? Like WTH??

StMary’s WAS where a guy could catch a legal walleye and Om Nom it on a fairly regular basis…..

Last year they supposedly popped in 4 million walleye fry….? Good investment eh…?

And 15 minutes down the road….. Jensen has a great walleye fishery… but ZERO retention for them and pike….

….. unless your of the ‘newer Canadian can’t read the regs’ crew that’s always there for commando raids….. or the local tractor driving-fishing contingency….

Jensen sure keeps the fish cops busy.

Now that the fishery is destined to be nuked…. Can I jus keep a couple yummy walleyes pretty please…?
Well said Bessie.. .. this whole zero keep thing in there is a joke , what would bw wring with a slot size keeper?...and for the past 2 years you have to walk to the spillway cause someone thought it a good idea to close the canal road on both ends in a provincial rec area ...cool, a fishing spot with limited access

Sent from my SM-G781W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 08-19-2023, 11:29 AM
Who Da Fisherman's Avatar
Who Da Fisherman Who Da Fisherman is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish99 View Post
The fish were flushed down stream when they dropped the water levels in the up stream reservoirs. For repairs and more water storage
I apologize, I just checked and they put in 213,000 walleye fry this year.
Guess they are trying to make it a walleye lake vs monster pike fishery, sad.
WDF
__________________
Fuel up, go for a drive, ask permission.....If you are scared, take your mom with you
Huntinstuff
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 08-19-2023, 05:53 PM
darrell f darrell f is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 93
Default

I was at the Ridge yesterday. No way to get a boat in. Water today at 56% and dropping. Lady at the gate told us that farmers in the area are having trouble with fish getting stuck in the irrigation pumps. And we cant keep a pike from there. Sad! Not much fishable water in the south, at least for walleye and pike. Future doesn't look good.
I was told by one of the smird guys that chin campground will be flooded within the next 5 years and they have plans to build a new campground. Where is that water coming from? As of today water there was 48%
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 08-20-2023, 06:37 PM
Wes_G Wes_G is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darrell f View Post
I was at the Ridge yesterday. No way to get a boat in. Water today at 56% and dropping. Lady at the gate told us that farmers in the area are having trouble with fish getting stuck in the irrigation pumps. And we cant keep a pike from there. Sad! Not much fishable water in the south, at least for walleye and pike. Future doesn't look good.
I was told by one of the smird guys that chin campground will be flooded within the next 5 years and they have plans to build a new campground. Where is that water coming from? As of today water there was 48%
Yes they are adding to the capacity of Chin. Need to raise the damns, bridge. campground will all be underwater and is being moved, not sure to where.

In a good precipitation year where we see a normal to above average snowfall in the mountains and actually get rain in the spring and occassionally through out the summer, I can see where that added reservoir capacity is welcome needed. But for some reason reason they are also rebuilding and tripling the capacity of the spillway where the water comes in near the power station on the west end. I am wondering where they are planning on getting water from to need that added spillway capacity.

We stopped by St Mary's on the way home from the mountains this morning. will post some photo's later.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 08-20-2023, 09:37 PM
Wes_G Wes_G is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,307
Default

A few photos of St. Mary's

Wally's


Boat Launch Bay


Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 08-21-2023, 09:43 AM
Esox Esox is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,193
Default

The only good part about these low water levels is that structure becomes very visible. If I still lived in the south, I would be out looking at all of these spots to try and see if there are any hidden pieces of structure that I normally would miss so I could GPS them for the future.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 08-21-2023, 10:49 AM
Drewski Canuck Drewski Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

Problem 1: All the fish that are trapped in the remains of the reservoir will soon be dead as the heat rises in the water.

Problem 2: If the fish are tough enough to survive the heat, the lack of any aquatic plant life in the deepest part means that there is no oxygen generation anyway.

Problem 3: As the Cormorants migrate south, all those fish in that puddle are sitting ducks as Cormorants dive 30 feet deep.

Problem 4: Even if the fish can survive that onslaught, the freeze will be considerable this winter, and whatever remains will winterkill.

So, how do you tell the Fisheries managers I told you so? And even if you can, do they really care?

Expect another cycle of ignorance punishing the fishing public from our Biologists if the reservoir returns to its former state. After all, they are the Government and they are here to help.

Drewski
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 08-21-2023, 10:58 AM
Macdrizzle Macdrizzle is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 370
Default

Looking at other neighboring reservoirs they're down but nowhere near St Mary's levels. Curious as to why St Marys is being hit the hardest. Can they not divert irrigation from other reservoirs to take some pressure off St. Marys?
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 08-21-2023, 11:43 AM
Smoky buck Smoky buck is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 7,493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewski Canuck View Post
Problem 1: All the fish that are trapped in the remains of the reservoir will soon be dead as the heat rises in the water.

Problem 2: If the fish are tough enough to survive the heat, the lack of any aquatic plant life in the deepest part means that there is no oxygen generation anyway.

Problem 3: As the Cormorants migrate south, all those fish in that puddle are sitting ducks as Cormorants dive 30 feet deep.

Problem 4: Even if the fish can survive that onslaught, the freeze will be considerable this winter, and whatever remains will winterkill.

So, how do you tell the Fisheries managers I told you so? And even if you can, do they really care?

Expect another cycle of ignorance punishing the fishing public from our Biologists if the reservoir returns to its former state. After all, they are the Government and they are here to help.

Drewski
1) depends on water depth and water temperature from inflow. You will likely see a partial kill but the first to go are often larger fish

2)is false aquatic plant life is not need to generate oxygen. Aquatic plants do produce oxygen during the day but lower oxygen levels at night.

3)predators will have an impact probably but even in a pond where fish are packed together in a higher concentration yearly loss to predators(and other factors) usually is under 30%. It will be lower in St Mary’s as it will be tougher for predators

4)Winter kill is likely the real threat to causing a major kill

Regardless there is going to be a loss and I agree theses southern irrigation waters should be managed differently. They should be managed so theses fish can be utilized rather than stock piled till things go wrong. Much better off the manage for moderate numbers and allow some harvest.

Only way things will change is if there is a push through proper lobbying with an unbiased argument and not over exaggerate issues either

Presently I am not seeing a group that’s primary focus is lobbying on behalf of Alberta anglers and until there is proper representation with a strong voice no change will happen
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 08-21-2023, 11:54 AM
pikergolf's Avatar
pikergolf pikergolf is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,383
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewski Canuck View Post
Problem 1: All the fish that are trapped in the remains of the reservoir will soon be dead as the heat rises in the water.

Problem 2: If the fish are tough enough to survive the heat, the lack of any aquatic plant life in the deepest part means that there is no oxygen generation anyway.

Problem 3: As the Cormorants migrate south, all those fish in that puddle are sitting ducks as Cormorants dive 30 feet deep.

Problem 4: Even if the fish can survive that onslaught, the freeze will be considerable this winter, and whatever remains will winterkill.

So, how do you tell the Fisheries managers I told you so? And even if you can, do they really care?

Expect another cycle of ignorance punishing the fishing public from our Biologists if the reservoir returns to its former state. After all, they are the Government and they are here to help.

Drewski
It is near the end of August, water is already cooling off.
__________________
“One of the sad signs of our times is that we have demonized those who produce, subsidized those who refuse to produce, and canonized those who complain.”

Thomas Sowell
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 08-21-2023, 12:31 PM
59whiskers 59whiskers is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South West Alberta
Posts: 806
Default

When will this province realize there is only so much water to go around and things change on a year to year basis. It is irresponsible to expand thousands of acres more in this province and guarantee more water for agriculture.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 08-21-2023, 03:16 PM
H380's Avatar
H380 H380 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WMU 108
Posts: 6,309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 59whiskers View Post
When will this province realize there is only so much water to go around and things change on a year to year basis. It is irresponsible to expand thousands of acres more in this province and guarantee more water for agriculture.
Exactly ...finally some one that gets it ..thank you.

Sent from my SM-G781W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 08-21-2023, 03:26 PM
H380's Avatar
H380 H380 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WMU 108
Posts: 6,309
Default

Sorry Drewski, fish are the least of the problem here..you have two parts of govt here..fish and Wildlife which seem to know nothing of managing these resources and the Dept of Environment which knows little about water management AND heaven forbid they be in contact with each other to discuss how they can work together. I pump out of the canal downstream from St. Marys and the water was.run at quite a.high level all summer , usually about 3 ft below my pump station . However for a 3 day period they had enough water that my pump tires sat in water !Environment had to know from the outset of spring irrigation season that the snowpack was well below normal but chose to run full tilt from the start , even higher at some points....no thought of rationing or maintaining a partial flow so there would be enough to last , just give er til its all gone .

Sent from my SM-G781W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 08-21-2023, 04:04 PM
alanflyfisher alanflyfisher is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 6
Default

St. Mary's is an 'on-stream' reservoir. They fill all the 'off-stream' reservoirs and most down stream reservoirs with all the water they can get because the 'on-stream' reservoirs always fill back up each and every Spring.

St. Mary's, Waterton, Oldman are all 'on-stream' and will refill...guaranteed.
H3O...That is the reason they have high canal flows during the Spring/Summer.
I can guarantee that there is a plethora of discussion between water managers and government officials that happens on a weekly basis on water flow from the Waterton all the way to Ridge and beyond. Same goes with the water that comes from the Bow River.

And yes, these reservoirs are managed not only for irrigation but also for residents of the many towns (i.e. Magrath, Raymond to name but two) that rely on this water as well. They are not managed for fisheries and never were or will be. You simply would not spend hundreds of millions of dollars on reservoirs, canals and pipelines to sustain a fish population. That would be idiotic.
So...all you worriers...leave it alone...St. Mary's has been low like this several times in the past 30 years that I have hunted, fished and lived there. It always fills back up...always.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 08-21-2023, 04:11 PM
SNAPFisher SNAPFisher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,444
Default

Curious when was the last time this happened to St. Mary's? Does anyone know? Even the last two times would be great to know.

I feel for our Southern anglers. Regardless of the primary use or not. And I certainly do not laugh at anyone getting upset over it. I would probably do that same. That and recent closures... I would like to buy all the Southern anglers a beer for hanging in there
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 08-21-2023, 05:37 PM
Wes_G Wes_G is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alanflyfisher View Post
St. Mary's is an 'on-stream' reservoir. They fill all the 'off-stream' reservoirs and most down stream reservoirs with all the water they can get because the 'on-stream' reservoirs always fill back up each and every Spring.

St. Mary's, Waterton, Oldman are all 'on-stream' and will refill...guaranteed.
H3O...That is the reason they have high canal flows during the Spring/Summer.
I can guarantee that there is a plethora of discussion between water managers and government officials that happens on a weekly basis on water flow from the Waterton all the way to Ridge and beyond. Same goes with the water that comes from the Bow River.

And yes, these reservoirs are managed not only for irrigation but also for residents of the many towns (i.e. Magrath, Raymond to name but two) that rely on this water as well. They are not managed for fisheries and never were or will be. You simply would not spend hundreds of millions of dollars on reservoirs, canals and pipelines to sustain a fish population. That would be idiotic.
So...all you worriers...leave it alone...St. Mary's has been low like this several times in the past 30 years that I have hunted, fished and lived there. It always fills back up...always.

Only St Mary's never did fill this year. From what I saw the highest it got was just below 80%. If we had rain in the spring it may have filled but we never did. So what happens if we get a below average snow pack and no 3 or 4 day rain event next spring? There is way more reservoir to fill now then there was in the spring time, that never filled then either.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 08-21-2023, 05:53 PM
H380's Avatar
H380 H380 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WMU 108
Posts: 6,309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wes_G View Post
Only St Mary's never did fill this year. From what I saw the highest it got was just below 80%. If we had rain in the spring it may have filled but we never did. So what happens if we get a below average snow pack and no 3 or 4 day rain event next spring? There is way more reservoir to fill now then there was in the spring time, that never filled then either.
Agreed , St.Marys never filled right up , not this year or last ..

Sent from my SM-G781W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 08-22-2023, 09:18 AM
bessiedog's Avatar
bessiedog bessiedog is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,372
Default

Agreed agreed…
I’ve fished it for 20 years… it’s never been this low.

….. and really…. Why the silly walleye limits then… ?


Last 2 years there was a pretty big drawdown, but then the boys were doing some repair/dredge work on it for a while…

She never filled up at all this spring… it was stupid low the Whole time
__________________
"How vain it is to sit down to write when you have not stood up to live.”
-HDT
"A vote is like a rifle; its usefulness depends on the character of the user." T. Roosevelt
"I don't always troll, only on days that end in Y."
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 08-22-2023, 11:01 AM
fish99's Avatar
fish99 fish99 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: pigeon lake
Posts: 1,578
Default

its looking like lake Mead
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 08-22-2023, 03:09 PM
Wes_G Wes_G is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bessiedog View Post
Agreed agreed…
I’ve fished it for 20 years… it’s never been this low.

….. and really…. Why the silly walleye limits then… ?


Last 2 years there was a pretty big drawdown, but then the boys were doing some repair/dredge work on it for a while…

She never filled up at all this spring… it was stupid low the Whole time

My thoughts as well. I like to eat fish but have always found more for entertainment value than food for the freezer. I haven't kept a walleye, pike or trout in this province in years. My whole opinion has now changed after this year. There is no use in being a conservation oriented angler when the lakes can be drained so low that everything can be wiped out. When I am able to keep fish, I will be.
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 08-22-2023, 05:20 PM
SNAPFisher SNAPFisher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,444
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish99 View Post
its looking like lake Mead
Not anymore. Lake mead is up over 65 feet and rising. Powell over 75 feet up and rising.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 08-23-2023, 10:34 AM
fish99's Avatar
fish99 fish99 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: pigeon lake
Posts: 1,578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SNAPFisher View Post
Not anymore. Lake mead is up over 65 feet and rising. Powell over 75 feet up and rising.
the same will happen on our southern resivoirs
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 08-25-2023, 07:08 AM
H380's Avatar
H380 H380 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WMU 108
Posts: 6,309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish99 View Post
the same will happen on our southern resivoirs
Can we get that in writing ? Hoping for a high volume snowfall this winter or it won't happen .

Sent from my SM-G781W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 08-25-2023, 10:16 PM
roy9525 roy9525 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish99 View Post
the same will happen on our southern resivoirs
Saint Mary’s May fill with snowpack but without very significant rainfall this fall or early spring our reservoirs are in big trouble. Any problem with snowpack and lack of rain and we are in for severe water rationing and reservoirs being emptied.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 08-25-2023, 10:57 PM
Off in the Bushes's Avatar
Off in the Bushes Off in the Bushes is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lethbridge
Posts: 1,811
Default

Milk river ridge is next. Can’t launch a boat and the gal that runs the entrance said it’s dropping 1 1/2 feet a day.
Maybe by running all these reservoirs empty, they can generate some optics to sell their narrative of global warming and climate change.

Last edited by Off in the Bushes; 08-25-2023 at 11:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 08-26-2023, 10:34 AM
macee macee is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: BowIsland
Posts: 449
Default

Got notice yesterday that SMRID is shutting down water on Sept22 instead of the regular date of Oct10.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 09-03-2023, 10:30 AM
H380's Avatar
H380 H380 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WMU 108
Posts: 6,309
Default

Update on the St Marys water ..recent rains in southwest Alberta have added significant runoff water to certain areas , the St Marys River running into the lake is up onto gravel bars similar to spring runoff levels however there appears to be no attempt to back some of this water up and save in the lake as downstream flows in the canal is up 2 ft from a week ago ...gotta fill those potato reservoirs is my guess .

Sent from my SM-G781W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 10-20-2023, 08:00 AM
H380's Avatar
H380 H380 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WMU 108
Posts: 6,309
Default

Well the water is low enough now that the outlet is visible...the guy that took the pic so, he doubts a reasonable size walleye could maybe it thru the narrow slats , a whitefish maybe but definitely not a large pike..so the fish gotta be very thick in paces of the remaining lake . The scare that irrigation officials gave us August 1 about water being totally shut off is such a joke , canal at my place south of Lethbridge still has 4 ft of water flowing and it is usually dry by Oct 19 . Some one at the top has no clue about how to manage the water and keep folks informed

Sent from my SM-G781W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 10-21-2023, 06:01 AM
SNAPFisher SNAPFisher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,444
Default

On an upbeat note, 10-30 cm of snow forecasted next week. Certainly Calgary area but could get further South. Hoping this could be the winter that renews things...
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 10-28-2023, 07:25 AM
Marty S Marty S is offline
AO Sponsor
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,477
Default

I dunno about that, Schwab and his WEF buddies claim the world is going to have an extreme water shortage next.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.