Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-04-2023, 06:38 AM
3blade's Avatar
3blade 3blade is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ebrand View Post
Some of the newer amendments are withdrawn.

C-21 still exists.

We need to keep the pressure on and vote those idiots out ASAP.

They will re word it and try to ram it through again. Fast.
Nothing is more persistent a than a Liberal with a dumb idea.
Ain’t that the truth. I think I found my new sig line.

And yeah, watch the next one pass at an emergency 3 am sitting

Why are lefties allowed to form coalitions, but western provinces aren’t? We need western Canada to simply reject the rule of Ottawa until we have equal representation (which will be never, because they will never agree to it)
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-04-2023, 09:43 AM
claykuch claykuch is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 244
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twisted Canuck View Post
This is not a win. The Bill will go through now, and the October OIC banning sale and transfer of handguns, still in effect, May 2020 OIC banning 'assault style rifles' still in effect.

Just more bait and switch, Conservatives calling a win, and we didn't win a damn thing.

But lots of gun owners sure got fooled apparently. Thinking this is some kind of a win because their hunting rifles and shotguns are 'SAFE' now. What a joke.
Agreed. Most people are fooled by bait and switch
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-04-2023, 05:01 PM
gunluvr's Avatar
gunluvr gunluvr is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,599
Default

So Turdo and his bunch of fools have capitulated proving the whole bill C-21 was never any more than a vote pushing campaign. What about the claims that this legislation is to "make Canada a safer place" by outlawing certain firearms? Have they tossed their own citizens under the bus by recalling certain gun bans? Will they be held accountable for future gun crimes because they lost their nerve in the face of criticism?
Most of us know the answers. The truth is this government has no balls.
I don't doubt they'll try another approach but credibility is something Trudeau's liberals are proving again and again just how superficial they really are.
__________________
Some days you're a bullet; some days you're a gopher.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-04-2023, 07:03 PM
270WIN 270WIN is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 976
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gunluvr View Post
So Turdo and his bunch of fools have capitulated proving the whole bill C-21 was never any more than a vote pushing campaign. What about the claims that this legislation is to "make Canada a safer place" by outlawing certain firearms? Have they tossed their own citizens under the bus by recalling certain gun bans? Will they be held accountable for future gun crimes because they lost their nerve in the face of criticism?
Most of us know the answers. The truth is this government has no balls.
I don't doubt they'll try another approach but credibility is something Trudeau's liberals are proving again and again just how superficial they really are.
Best post I've seen on this. Very well said.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-04-2023, 08:14 PM
whitetail Junkie's Avatar
whitetail Junkie whitetail Junkie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AB
Posts: 6,638
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by bat119 View Post
The Liberal government has withdrawn a series of controversial amendments to pending firearms legislation, C-21 — changes that some firearms owners say would have unfairly targeted hunters and farmers.

Liberal MP Taleeb Noormohamed said Friday the government would scrap a clause that would have effectively banned any rifle or shotgun that could potentially accept a magazine with more than five rounds, whether or not it actually has such a magazine.

The government is also withdrawing a list of guns that would have been classified as "prohibited" firearms.

The government had intended to ban long guns that generate more than 10,000 joules of energy, or guns with a muzzle wider than 20 millimetres — two rules that would have rendered many firearms illegal.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ott...ents-1.6735828

Still a long way to
So the guns with the 10,000 joules and 20mm+ muzzles are off the chopping block now ???
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-05-2023, 08:55 AM
DirtShooter's Avatar
DirtShooter DirtShooter is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Alberta
Posts: 611
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitetail Junkie View Post
So the guns with the 10,000 joules and 20mm+ muzzles are off the chopping block now ???
If its in the oic its still banned.
__________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-14-2023, 08:32 PM
Salavee Salavee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bat119 View Post
The Liberal government has withdrawn a series of controversial amendments to pending firearms legislation, C-21 — changes that some firearms owners say would have unfairly targeted hunters and farmers.

Liberal MP Taleeb Noormohamed said Friday the government would scrap a clause that would have effectively banned any rifle or shotgun that could potentially accept a magazine with more than five rounds, whether or not it actually has such a magazine.

The government is also withdrawing a list of guns that would have been classified as "prohibited" firearms.

The government had intended to ban long guns that generate more than 10,000 joules of energy, or guns with a muzzle wider than 20 millimetres — two rules that would have rendered many firearms ille

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ott...ents-1.6735828

Still a long way to
Not exactly the thread topic but would you mind listing just one in that category that would affect us? Joules Muzzle dia)
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-14-2023, 09:24 PM
Hawkeye Hawkeye is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 746
Default

I believe that a 460 Weatherby exceeds the energy limit.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-15-2023, 05:48 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gunluvr View Post
So Turdo and his bunch of fools have capitulated proving the whole bill C-21 was never any more than a vote pushing campaign. What about the claims that this legislation is to "make Canada a safer place" by outlawing certain firearms? Have they tossed their own citizens under the bus by recalling certain gun bans? Will they be held accountable for future gun crimes because they lost their nerve in the face of criticism?
Most of us know the answers. The truth is this government has no balls.
I don't doubt they'll try another approach but credibility is something Trudeau's liberals are proving again and again just how superficial they really are.
The simple fact ,is that the liberals do the things that they do, because there are fools that keep approving of what they do, by voting for them again, and again.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 02-15-2023, 04:34 PM
AI 6.5 AI 6.5 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Edmonton/San Tan Valley,Arizona
Posts: 802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
The simple fact ,is that the liberals do the things that they do, because there are fools that keep approving of what they do, by voting for them again, and again.
^^^This^^^
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.