Quote:
Originally Posted by pipco
This would not be a short term fix and would take some time but how about hiring a lawyer to challenge this ridiculous (Section 263 (1) ) code?
I would be willing to put up a few dollars to fight this ruling.
I'm deeply saddened by this turn of events. How many thousands of dollars invested in hatchery trout will be lost in stocked aerated lakes? It is extremely disturbing that we need more laws in place to protect us from our own ignorance and stupidity.
Stan
|
Again I believe it's a legal issue on public land. Try to find a way to make it private or leased then the legislation won't apply. Could be a Rec Lease, SLU zone or other disposition surrounding the lakes/ponds, and removing the public status. The end effects will be restricted areas to ice fishing which will generate a backlash, but ACA could protect the quality lakes.
Threaded Mode
