Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-21-2017, 06:14 PM
buckchaser buckchaser is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 63
Default Toyota Tundra & Tacoma - real world feedback

My 2006 Nissan Xterra is nearing the end and either a Tundra Double Cab or Tacoma Double Cab will likely be replacing it.

What sort of "real world" fuel mileage are you seeing (assuming stock"ish" tires, etc.)?

Folks find the Tacoma Double Cab roomy enough for gear storage and occasional passengers?

Any other relevant info that might not be immediately obvious after a brief test drive would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-21-2017, 06:17 PM
riden riden is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,545
Default

I have never calculated the mileage I get on my 17 Tundra, because it sucks and I know it. I am not even close to getting what my buddy gets from his Dodge.

But I love the truck and the motor and have never regretted buying it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-21-2017, 06:45 PM
TimeOff's Avatar
TimeOff TimeOff is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Yes
Posts: 721
Default

07 Tundra Dbl cab, 10 years now and still puts a smile on my face when I drive it. With the 5.7l has power to spare, but doesn't spare the gas, Avg 14l/ 100 km city. Just keep it serviced well and no issues. Replaced brakes and shocks last year to performance pads and rotors and bilstien shocks, drives better than new now. Couple things I added when I purchased was a Cat back exhaust and rear airbags with compressor to pump up when I had the Travel Trailer on or hauling lots in the bed. I'd get another!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-21-2017, 06:53 PM
260 Rem 260 Rem is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Central Alberta
Posts: 8,315
Default

Kept track my Tacoma (V6) automatic for the first 2000K and it was 11L per 100Km ...combined city/hwy. Not much “city” driving.
__________________
Old Guys Rule
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-21-2017, 07:44 PM
260 Rem 260 Rem is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Central Alberta
Posts: 8,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 260 Rem View Post
Kept track my Tacoma (V6) automatic for the first 2000K and it was 11L per 100Km ...combined city/hwy. Not much “city” driving.
I should have mentioned, mine is 2013 \ 4L engine.
__________________
Old Guys Rule
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-21-2017, 07:56 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,181
Default

I have owned my 2007 Tundra since new. Mileage usually averages around 14-15 l/100km in combined driving through all seasons. I replaced the original battery a year ago, and the front brakes a couple of months ago, and other than that, all that has been replaced is tires, oil, and filters.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-21-2017, 08:06 PM
denpacc's Avatar
denpacc denpacc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 693
Default

2010 Tundra Double Cab Ltd, average 17 litres/100km city, about 13.5 litres/100km highway at 120-122 kms/hr. Got 12.2 litres/100kms driving to Bellingham, WA. Only scheduled maintenance, very reliable to date, 234000kms. Would buy another in a heart beat.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-21-2017, 08:13 PM
ak-71 ak-71 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Almaty
Posts: 2,032
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 260 Rem View Post
Kept track my Tacoma (V6) automatic for the first 2000K and it was 11L per 100Km ...combined city/hwy. Not much “city” driving.
x2 Tacoma 2008, same mileage when I measured and no other complains so far, not much towing though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-21-2017, 06:57 PM
fishead fishead is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cochrane
Posts: 454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeOff View Post
07 Tundra Dbl cab, 10 years now and still puts a smile on my face when I drive it. With the 5.7l has power to spare, but doesn't spare the gas, Avg 14l/ 100 km city. Just keep it serviced well and no issues. Replaced brakes and shocks last year to performance pads and rotors and bilstien shocks, drives better than new now. Couple things I added when I purchased was a Cat back exhaust and rear airbags with compressor to pump up when I had the Travel Trailer on or hauling lots in the bed. I'd get another!
Have an 07 as well, replaced brakes regular maintenance runs like new. Mileage well ya know, its a truck.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-21-2017, 07:09 PM
JWCalgary JWCalgary is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 653
Default

My 2015 taco gets 8.5 to 11.5 km per litre city vs hwy. The range of a tank of gas is about 550 km. Not impressed with the overall range and wished they had a bigger tank but all in all its a little workhorse that gets the job done. No issues with gear storage in the double cab.



Sent from my SM-G530W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-21-2017, 07:22 PM
buckchaser buckchaser is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 63
Default

3.5 L V6 engine?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JWCalgary View Post
My 2015 taco gets 8.5 to 11.5 km per litre city vs hwy. The range of a tank of gas is about 550 km. Not impressed with the overall range and wished they had a bigger tank but all in all its a little workhorse that gets the job done. No issues with gear storage in the double cab.



Sent from my SM-G530W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-21-2017, 07:36 PM
JWCalgary JWCalgary is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buckchaser View Post
3.5 L V6 engine?
Yep

Sent from my SM-G530W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-21-2017, 07:40 PM
whitetail Junkie's Avatar
whitetail Junkie whitetail Junkie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AB
Posts: 6,638
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JWCalgary View Post
Yep

Sent from my SM-G530W using Tapatalk
they never put the 3.5L in until the 2016 models
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-21-2017, 08:01 PM
JWCalgary JWCalgary is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitetail Junkie View Post
they never put the 3.5L in until the 2016 models
Oops 4litre.... i know where the gas goes though

Sent from my SM-G530W using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-21-2017, 07:44 PM
ColdFlame ColdFlame is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Kootenays, BC
Posts: 46
Default '05 Tacoma Double Cab

I purchased a Tacoma Double-Cab TRD Sport new in 2005 (at the time it was the new body style) with the 5' bed and a 6 speed manual. I *love* the truck. I have about 246,000km's on the truck now. I still smile when I get behind the wheel.

Fuel mileage is terrible for what it is (in my opinion). The 6spd manual transmission actually gets worse fuel mileage than the automatic, which I find bizarre. 6th gear is not nearly tall enough.

It has been very reliable. Aside from regular maintenance or Toyota recalls(crappy leaf springs, premature frame rust, squeaky clutch, etc...), I've had the two rear axle seals go and two pulleys go.

The paint isn't great - I find it very weak and chips far too easily. The rust sets in quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-21-2017, 07:31 PM
curtz curtz is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Half Moon Lake ( North )
Posts: 1,455
Default

I had a 2014 taco that i used for oilfield work, tough truck, I put 175,000km on it and all I put in it was front brakes and rear shocks. It had the 4.0L and the best I got was around 21mpg, around 16-17mpg oilfield work. I now have a 2017 with 3.5L, it only has 6000km on it but so far the best I got was 26mpg and around 20-21mpg oilfield work, happy with that.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-22-2017, 10:51 AM
Scott h Scott h is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by curtz View Post
I had a 2014 taco that i used for oilfield work, tough truck, I put 175,000km on it and all I put in it was front brakes and rear shocks. It had the 4.0L and the best I got was around 21mpg, around 16-17mpg oilfield work. I now have a 2017 with 3.5L, it only has 6000km on it but so far the best I got was 26mpg and around 20-21mpg oilfield work, happy with that.
That's actually quite an improvement with the 3.5 L.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-22-2017, 01:28 PM
Wrongside Wrongside is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,087
Default

I've had my 2016 Tundra w/ 5.7 for almost 2 years now. Averaging 15 l/per 100 over the life of the truck, according to the computer. I'm satisfied with that, considering many of those miles are city, and most of our highway miles are loaded and in the mountains. It's been a flawless truck so far.

The new Gen of Tacomas are getting very mixed reviews. Several guys on the Tundra forums have traded their Tacoma in with less than a years ownership and gone to Tundras.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-22-2017, 06:02 PM
curtz curtz is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Half Moon Lake ( North )
Posts: 1,455
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott h View Post
That's actually quite an improvement with the 3.5 L.
Yah my 2014 was a 5 speed auto and 2017 has a 6 speed auto, the old one deffiently had better low end power.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-22-2017, 03:49 PM
stuckincity stuckincity is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,319
Default

One of my neighbors has a Tundra double cab and says around 17 - 18 MPG on the highway.
One of my daughters had a Tacoma double cab a couple of years ago, automatic, and said her mileage wasn't much better than the neighbor's Tundra. Didn't say by how much.

I can't confirm or deny any of this, just thought I'd tell you what I heard.

I'm a Chevy/GM boy so I didn't pay a lot of attention, and just shrugged.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-22-2017, 06:15 PM
Stinky Buffalo's Avatar
Stinky Buffalo Stinky Buffalo is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: A bit North o' Center...
Posts: 11,166
Default Toyota Tundra & Tacoma - real world feedback

We have the 2015 Tundra with the super crew cab. Best we get is 12l/100 km on the highway trips, towing the trailer more like 24l/100 km.

It has been trouble free so far. Lots of room and power. Some little design annoyances, but those are things you’’d find with any vehicle.

Wish they’d make a longer bed with the super crew. The back seats are almost TOO roomy. And a bigger tank would be nice (an aftermarket tank is an option, at the cost of some clearance, though). I just take some jerry cans if I’’m heading off into the wilds.

If I didn’t have extra passengers often, I would get the extended cab instead. Also, I believe they have more rear under-seat storage (the super crew has none).
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-22-2017, 07:26 PM
blackonblackfx4 blackonblackfx4 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 513
Default

Had both a 2012 4L Tacoma which got around 12-14L/100 highway and now a 2016 Tacoma with the 3.5L and get 9.5-11L/100 avg on the highway. Decent fuel economy for sure. Shifts a lot but you get used to it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-22-2017, 07:39 PM
7mmremmag 7mmremmag is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 1,539
Default

I’m on my second tundra. First one was a 2015 in the 1794 model. Loved it! So when they called and asked me to trade in on a new 2017 with the bigger tank I jumped on it. I’m a rig consultant so I put lots of miles on chasing the rig around, I put 117,000km on the 2015 in 18 months. Never had a single issue. My 2017 is a platinum and I really like it, I did the 4” lift and 33” tires, fender flares, tonneau cover etc. I am very happy with it
Avg 16L/100km, I drive a little faster than I should and it’s got the bigger tires.
I’ve got 62,000km on the new one and zero issues.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-22-2017, 08:50 PM
Homesteader's Avatar
Homesteader Homesteader is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: West of Edmonton
Posts: 2,288
Default

17 Tacoma Off Road double cab. Average 11.5-12.5 depending on outside temps. Best ever 9.8 on one tank, 90-100km/h.

Not a truck I'd want for more then two people, but it has enough room for gear with two guys. Rides nice. I drive almost exclusively in tow mode, and it runs like a truck should. It's a tired dog running around in drive without the tow mode (ECT). Without tow mode on the truck upshifts far too quickly, and actually uses more fuel because its lugging. Keep it above 1800rpm, and it's relatively happy.

Also has squeaky leaf springs, but there is a new tsb for that.

I'm still happy that I got it, but I did expect better from Toyota. Always drove full size GM's prior, but needed to downsize. If I had the room, I'd of stayed full size. Far more interior space, and cargo capacity. Fuel economy on the newer 1/2 tons isn't far off the little guys.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-22-2017, 10:18 PM
elkhunter1234 elkhunter1234 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Magrath, Alberta
Posts: 1,914
Default

I just picked up a used 2010 Tundra DC Limited last week, only ran one tank through it and it came in bang on 19 MPG. First Toyota I’ve ever owned, not sure why I went that route as I’m a diehard Ford guy, but so far I’m loving this Tundra..

Jim...
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-27-2017, 12:58 PM
Stinky Buffalo's Avatar
Stinky Buffalo Stinky Buffalo is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: A bit North o' Center...
Posts: 11,166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7mmremmag View Post
First one was a 2015 in the 1794 model
*drool*
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-26-2017, 08:32 PM
martinbns martinbns is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Winnipeg, Mb
Posts: 377
Default

I had a 2009 Tacoma, easily the worst vehicle I have ever owned including a 1990 ford Tempo.

Rattlebucket, terrible ergonomics, got the same mileage as my previous 5.4l V8 F150, back seat completely unusable.

The truck was terrible in every way, the only thing worse than the truck was the service a Mayfield Toyota.
I wouldn't own a toyota product for all the money in the world, all right well maybe for all the money...
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-26-2017, 08:58 PM
saddleup's Avatar
saddleup saddleup is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On the 49th 'The Medicine Line''
Posts: 1,041
Default

I have a US made Tacoma, o7, double cab v 6 and get 22 mpg on hiway and 17 to 19 off road. I really like the truck, locker rear end, 6 spd trans and loaded & w/ short box. My friend does like getting into it, cant fiqure it out..... either he has a big head or the door frame is too low...lol
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-29-2017, 04:28 PM
Big Sky's Avatar
Big Sky Big Sky is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,310
Default

Open diffs on the front and rear seem to be the norm on Toyota 4x4 trucks. Does anyone see any issues with the lack of a locker in the rear?

Quote:
Originally Posted by martinbns View Post
I had a 2009 Tacoma, easily the worst vehicle I have ever owned including a 1990 ford Tempo.
What's the matter with a Ford Tempo? This guy considers it to be a real 'drivers car'.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4Ws_Bp7WYA
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-29-2017, 04:47 PM
Homesteader's Avatar
Homesteader Homesteader is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: West of Edmonton
Posts: 2,288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Sky View Post
Open diffs on the front and rear seem to be the norm on Toyota 4x4 trucks. Does anyone see any issues with the lack of a locker in the rear?



What's the matter with a Ford Tempo? This guy considers it to be a real 'drivers car'.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4Ws_Bp7WYA
Mine has factory rear locker. Some models have them, some don't.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.