Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2012, 12:06 PM
Ques Ques is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 53
Default .223 for big game

Just reading the regs and it says its unlawfull to hunt big game with anything less than .223 cal. It use to read ".223 or less". When did that change? Not sure that's a good change.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2012, 12:09 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,183
Default

Below is copied directly from the regulations.

Quote:
BIG GAME

It is unlawful to

set out, use or employ any of the following items for the purpose of hunting big game:
ammunition of less than .23 calibre,
To my knowledge the regulations never stated

Quote:
".223 or less"
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2012, 12:15 PM
Desert_Faux's Avatar
Desert_Faux Desert_Faux is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Leduc, Alberta
Posts: 238
Default

Honestly, about the only portion of the regs that, IMHO, is dumb..

I can't use a .223 to take a deer, but I can use a .30 Carbine...??

Shot Black Bear and Deer in B.C. with .223, worked just fine...

Is Alberta the ONLY province to NOT allow the use of the .223 for Big Game hunting?
__________________
My posts are the intellectual property of the person commenting under the pseudonym "Desert_Faux". These posts are for informational and entertainment use only. Copying or quoting in whole, or in part, is given free license for use by any member of this board for use on this board. Any use, in whole or in part, for reference outside this forum requires the express written consent of its author.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2012, 12:37 PM
kmart kmart is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Somewhere near Glendon
Posts: 83
Default

Saskatchewan has the same regulation, as Alberta. Don't know about the other Provinces though.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2012, 12:45 PM
sillyak sillyak is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lacombe, AB
Posts: 1,404
Default

I believe BC and Manitoba are the only provinces that allow its use. A .223 with the proper bullet in the proper spot will kill deer just fine. I don't have a problem with the regulation though. I think there are too many out there who would use a 55 grain varmint bullet, combined with the not so great shooting of many hunters, I'd rather just have the .23 cal regulation in place.

Not like an enthusiast has any shortage of rifles to take out hunting anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2012, 01:28 PM
Cal Cal is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: slave lake
Posts: 4,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sillyak View Post
I believe BC and Manitoba are the only provinces that allow its use. A .223 with the proper bullet in the proper spot will kill deer just fine. I don't have a problem with the regulation though. I think there are too many out there who would use a 55 grain varmint bullet, combined with the not so great shooting of many hunters, I'd rather just have the .23 cal regulation in place.

Not like an enthusiast has any shortage of rifles to take out hunting anyways.
I was under the impression that in Ontario one could shoot deer with a .223 or 22-250. Good point on the bullet thing though, the majority of .223 amo out there seems to be intended for varmints. Would probably not be a great idea to give the ignorant masses the go ahead to start lobbing bulk pack varmint amo at big game. In order for .223 calibers to be legal there would have to be more rules in place on their use further complicating things. People seem to have enough trouble understanding the regs as is.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2012, 01:52 PM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,782
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ques View Post
Just reading the regs and it says its unlawfull to hunt big game with anything less than .223 cal. It use to read ".223 or less". When did that change? Not sure that's a good change.
I think you are mistaken....a .223 bullet has never been legal to use on big game in Alberta for as long as I have been around. That's why it states... .23 caliber....

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-29-2012, 02:41 PM
HammerNAnvil HammerNAnvil is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: High River Alberta
Posts: 49
Default

.223 could proficiently handle small deer, but a .243 is really the lowest I'd start at. A .223 is still a .22
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-29-2012, 03:03 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,183
Default

The bottom line, is that the regulation never actually changed. The OP was mistaken.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-29-2012, 07:24 PM
boonerkiller's Avatar
boonerkiller boonerkiller is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Grande Prairie
Posts: 299
Default

I only ever remember a .243 and up being legal.
__________________
Go for the Bone
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-29-2012, 07:35 PM
bulletman bulletman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,103
Default legal calibre

.23 calibre up, not .223
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-29-2012, 08:34 PM
Grizzly Adams's Avatar
Grizzly Adams Grizzly Adams is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert_Faux View Post
Honestly, about the only portion of the regs that, IMHO, is dumb..

I can't use a .223 to take a deer, but I can use a .30 Carbine...??

Shot Black Bear and Deer in B.C. with .223, worked just fine...

Is Alberta the ONLY province to NOT allow the use of the .223 for Big Game hunting?
In the old days the regs also stated the cartridge case had to be 1 3/4 long, which would have disqualified both of the above. Seemed like a very valid way of thinking. Never heard why they changed it.


Grizz
__________________
"Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal."
John E. Pfeiffer The Emergence of Man
written in 1969
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.