James Okeefe releases second under cover video massive voter fraud

[avb3]

Originally Posted by stringer

Really what's that have to do with voter fraud.
And how would you know that his business are losing money are you his personal accountant or are you just making this s--t up or are you repeating a MSM lie.

Did you read the article? Do you know who Foursquare is?

[stringer]

Originally Posted by avb3

Did you read the article? Do you know who Foursquare is?

Don't have to
The only person that knows his financial situation is Donald Trump.
Anyone else's opinion is just speculation.
Again what does that have to do with voter fraud.

[stringer]

8 times hypocritical Democrats claimed that an election had been stolen or wrigged


http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/19/...stolen-rigged/

[bessiedog]

It appears that the Globe and Mail is carrying an O'keefe sting on the front page.

Stringer might have something. I guess it depends on the tape and how it's put together for me.

I might even load it up in Premiere and study the edit lines.

I really thought a third candidate would have jumped in. I don't know why one didn't.

[ak-71]

If somebody has hard time reading "LIAR" facial expression, here are examples:
Democrats asked about O'Keefe tapes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDA_liuy0-o

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...interview.html

[stringer]

Originally Posted by ak-71

If somebody has hard time reading "LIAR" facial expression, here are examples:
Democrats asked about O'Keefe tapes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDA_liuy0-o

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...interview.html

Funny how the Dems are the only ones allowed to claim that something was edited or rigged. Oh yea the Russians are interfering in our elections ( in other words their rigging the election )
Clinton knows she's going to loss the election and is setting it up now in order to blame them after she losses.
A possible challange to the results.

[ak-71]

Originally Posted by stringer

Funny how the Dems are the only ones allowed to claim that something was edited or rigged. Oh yea the Russians are interfering in our elections ( in other words their rigging the election )
Clinton knows she's going to loss the election and is setting it up now in order to blame them after she losses.
A possible challange to the results.

I think she is going to win. Not because the elections are rigged, or even if they are a bit tampered with, but because her followers are going to vote for her despite any reasons not to.
With the way MSM work it's guarantied - watched it happening in Russia before, different country - same crup.
Rigging accusations are nothing new too, almost the same words "There are some irregularities, but it's impossible to rig or falsify election results in Russia"

When vote counts start looking like this - USA is done:

[stringer]

Originally Posted by ak-71

I think she is going to win. Not because the elections are rigged, or even if they are a bit tampered with, but because her followers are going to vote for her despite any reasons not to.
With the way MSM work it's guarantied - watched it happening in Russia before, different country - same crup.
Rigging accusations are nothing new too, almost the same words "There are some irregularities, but it's impossible to rig or falsify election results in Russia"

When vote counts start looking like this - USA is done:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016...ning-election/

[ak-71]

never mind

[wags]

Originally Posted by ak-71

They got your link, stringer!
"Not found, error 404"

If nothing else, I guess Clinton works fast...right?

[stringer]

Originally Posted by ak-71

They got your link, stringer!
"Not found, error 404"

Fixed it