|
|
03-27-2020, 02:01 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 509
|
|
25.06 load recipes
Having a little more time on my hands I was thinking about loading up some rounds for the summer/fall. It's been quite a long time since I have utilized my reloading press, but with my wife getting into hunting I would like to start to load a few more rounds for practice. The last four years I have been using factory loaded Barnes 100gr TTSX BT with great accuracy and in the field performance.
My reloading manuals are mostly older than I am, I was thinking of trying to find some online resources. Where do you guys go for current load data? Nosler looks like a decent resource. Does ground shipping take a while for reloading products?
Cheers,
|
03-27-2020, 04:03 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,614
|
|
Just google the powder manufacturers, and you’ll easily navigate into some data resources.
Hodgdon, IMR, and Winchester, are all under the same site.
My favourites are IMR 4831, 7828, RL22.
__________________
There are no absolutes
|
03-27-2020, 05:06 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 3,660
|
|
IMR 4350 for me
__________________
Dont sweat the petty stuff, and dont pet the sweaty stuff
|
03-27-2020, 06:23 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lacombe
Posts: 2,464
|
|
As with Dick R22 and IMR 4831 have worked with several bullets in a couple different rifles
|
03-27-2020, 10:18 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,405
|
|
Barnes may have data online.
Ive take a few deer with imr 4350 and 110gr accubonds.
|
03-28-2020, 05:07 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 4,490
|
|
__________________
The problem we have today is that the people who work for a living are outnumbered by the people who vote for a living.
We were all born ignorant but one must work very hard to remain that way.
|
03-28-2020, 09:13 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 509
|
|
Thanks for the help guys!
|
03-28-2020, 09:37 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pincher Creek
Posts: 921
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by waldedw
|
I have a Barnes manual and also use their website data. You should know that if a particular powder you want to use is not listed send them an email using their online address asking for specific information regarding specific powders and they will reply with the information you need. I have done this a number of times and have been very impressed with their detailed response. Sometimes it has taken a few days to receive a response. I am a Barns bullet fan as well as a fan of their product support.
__________________
Ranger
|
03-28-2020, 09:43 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pincher Creek
Posts: 921
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284
Just google the powder manufacturers, and you’ll easily navigate into some data resources.
Hodgdon, IMR, and Winchester, are all under the same site.
My favourites are IMR 4831, 7828, RL22.
|
Curious Dick, do you see difference between using IMR 4831 and RL 22?
I have loaded IMR 4831 and Hodgdon 4831 in my wife's 2506 for years but have never experimented with RL 22.
__________________
Ranger
|
03-28-2020, 10:59 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,521
|
|
Reloader 26 and VV N560 work really with 25-06. I’ve also had a lot of success with Berger 115vldh & swift scirocco 2 mixed with some h4813sc. I was able to also get 1000 Speer 100gr bt on the cheep 20$/100 rounds and they also shoot really well. The only thing my rifle didn’t like was the nosler partitions untill I tried ramshot powder.
I’ve been using quick load and various other online sites for data. A lot of the manufactures will email you some data if you ask the directly Berger was great to talk to and they gave me a pile of load data and reading material on how to load there bullets.
|
03-28-2020, 11:21 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 39
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger CS
Curious Dick, do you see difference between using IMR 4831 and RL 22?
I have loaded IMR 4831 and Hodgdon 4831 in my wife's 2506 for years but have never experimented with RL 22.
|
Wondering if you saw much a difference between IMR 4831 and Hodgdon 4831. They seem to be the most popular two powders listed from what I've read? I'm just getting into reloading right now and my 25-06 is top priority!
|
03-28-2020, 04:41 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Morinville
Posts: 1,312
|
|
I’m using IMR 4350 with 100gr Sierra GK.
I just started using R22 that I had left over from 6.5 Swede. I found it quite accurate with Speer 100gr sp.
Still trying to see what my Barnes TSX will like.
|
03-28-2020, 07:06 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pincher Creek
Posts: 921
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snijders96
Wondering if you saw much a difference between IMR 4831 and Hodgdon 4831. They seem to be the most popular two powders listed from what I've read? I'm just getting into reloading right now and my 25-06 is top priority!
|
I get similar results with IMR compared to Hodgdon 4831. I really can not say I have determined one works better than the other in my particular rifle.
I do like the Hodgdon Short Cut simply because it drops a little easier out of the powder measure. Then again I way each load anyway. I am sure you know from your data charts that IMR and Hodgdon are not the same and have different Minimum and Maximum load values.
__________________
Ranger
|
03-28-2020, 11:07 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 509
|
|
I ended up picking up some IMR 4831 because they had some at Wholesale. I got in and out and can now reload through this social distancing period.
|
03-29-2020, 12:08 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 536
|
|
My 25-06 AI shoots best with H1000 and 115 Berger’s at 3350 FPS. I found R22 and 7828 to temp sensitive. R22 pressured up very early and couldn’t get the speed or accuracy I wanted with that powder. With that said the barrel is basically toast so it will be re barreled to a fast twist 1-7.25” twist CF to shoot the 131 BJ.
|
03-29-2020, 05:53 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Calgary
Posts: 470
|
|
I just bedded the action on my M700 .25-06. Went and re tested a few loads today. Wanted to see how H4350 stood up against H4831. Up until this point I've always loaded with IMR4831 and wanted to switch over to the Hodgdon extreme powders.
All loads were Win brass, CCI 200 primers and 100gr Nosler ballistic tips. All groups were 5 shots at 100 yds with plenty of time between to cool the barrel.
These we're my two best loads out of the 10 that I tested. I like the extra 200fps I'm getting with the H4350, but should I stick with the H4831? I'm thinking more for availability than anything else.
|
03-29-2020, 06:59 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,614
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronneroi
I just bedded the action on my M700 .25-06. Went and re tested a few loads today. Wanted to see how H4350 stood up against H4831. Up until this point I've always loaded with IMR4831 and wanted to switch over to the Hodgdon extreme powders.
All loads were Win brass, CCI 200 primers and 100gr Nosler ballistic tips. All groups were 5 shots at 100 yds with plenty of time between to cool the barrel.
These we're my two best loads out of the 10 that I tested. I like the extra 200fps I'm getting with the H4350, but should I stick with the H4831? I'm thinking more for availability than anything else.
|
200 FPS more? Is that checked with a chronograph?
If I were you I’d load 1/2 grain more of each load, and 1/2 grain less of each load, as well as replicate the posted loads again, and go shoot some groups with those 6 loads.
Then I’d try the best looking groups again, and yet again at 300 yds.
__________________
There are no absolutes
|
03-29-2020, 07:12 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Calgary
Posts: 470
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284
200 FPS more? Is that checked with a chronograph?
If I were you I’d load 1/2 grain more of each load, and 1/2 grain less of each load, as well as replicate the posted loads again, and go shoot some groups with those 6 loads.
Then I’d try the best looking groups again, and yet again at 300 yds.
|
Yep, that was recorded with a chrono.
50gr H4350
3156
3158
3138
3189
3144
52gr H4831
ERR
2981
2967
2965
ERR
Roughly 200fps difference on the average.
Was definitely going to replicate those two loads. I'll add in the .5gr loads for next time as well. Thanks Dick.
|
03-29-2020, 07:16 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,614
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronneroi
Yep, that was recorded with a chrono.
50gr H4350
3156
3158
3138
3189
3144
52gr H4831
ERR
2981
2967
2965
ERR
Roughly 200fps difference on the average.
Was definitely going to replicate those two loads. I'll add in the .5gr loads for next time as well. Thanks Dick.
|
You’re also 2 grains shy with the H4831 if you’re chasing max loads according to Hodgdon.
That’s likely why the big velocity difference.
You’re also at least 100 FPS slower maybe more, than published velocities in this bullet weight even with your 4350 load.
__________________
There are no absolutes
|
03-29-2020, 07:47 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Strathmore
Posts: 5,620
|
|
You guys chiming in with some helpful advice take a bow!! It's what makes this place so good. Thanks!
__________________
If you're not a Liberal when you're young, you have no heart. If you're not a Conservative when you're old, you have no brain. Winston Churchill
You can, you should, & if you're brave enough to start, you will. Stephen King
|
03-29-2020, 07:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Calgary
Posts: 470
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284
You’re also 2 grains shy with the H4831 if you’re chasing max loads according to Hodgdon.
That’s likely why the big velocity difference.
You’re also at least 100 FPS slower maybe more, than published velocities in this bullet weight even with your 4350 load.
|
The 54gr load of H4831 shot 2MOA at 3097fps so I decided not to go ahead with that load.
The OAL is 3.242. I believe the posted OAL is 3.200. Could that be the reason for the lower velocity?
|
03-29-2020, 08:09 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,614
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronneroi
The 54gr load of H4831 shot 2MOA at 3097fps so I decided not to go ahead with that load.
The OAL is 3.242. I believe the posted OAL is 3.200. Could that be the reason for the lower velocity?
|
OAL has zero bearing, as the test rifle most likely had a different leade, than your rifle. I would sooner have the amount off the leade referenced.
I as a habit start around 10 thou off the leade, with conventional cup core bullets.
This is also tempered with the ability of the rounds to fit in the rifles magazine box. Mag box first, near the lands second. Monolithic bullets are a whole different kettle of fish.
__________________
There are no absolutes
|
03-29-2020, 08:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Morinville
Posts: 1,312
|
|
Agreed 100% with OAL to Mag box, I usually end up squeezing every last square thou of an inch out of OAL and accuracy results tend to satisfy the author of that load, me. The magic # for me tends to hover around fifty three point five for both R22 and IMR 4350.
Thankfully my 25-06 is a single shot so the OAL dept doesn’t overly concern itself here however trying to work up something for Barnes TSX is depleting stock.
|
03-29-2020, 09:14 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Calgary
Posts: 470
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284
OAL has zero bearing, as the test rifle most likely had a different leade, than your rifle. I would sooner have the amount off the leade referenced.
I as a habit start around 10 thou off the leade, with conventional cup core bullets.
This is also tempered with the ability of the rounds to fit in the rifles magazine box. Mag box first, near the lands second. Monolithic bullets are a whole different kettle of fish.
|
I'm sitting 0.030 off the lands with those suckers, just a hair shy of my mag box. One of those Kwik Klip conversions.
|
03-29-2020, 09:21 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cowtown, agian
Posts: 2,815
|
|
I've used RL22, H4831, H4350 and Magnum in the 25-06 and 25-06AI.
FWIW the best all-round powder was definitely H4350 as far as consistent accuracy and speed. 3300 with 100gr bullets and 3050 with 115gr was easy to get in the standard.
That's said really speedy loads hands down went to Magnum. I had 3450 for 100gr and 3200 for the 115gr in the AI. RL22 was close, but not nearly as accurate.
__________________
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.
- Sir Winston Churchill
A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody ought not to be trusted by anybody.
-Thomas Paine
|
03-29-2020, 09:23 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,614
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronneroi
I'm sitting 0.030 off the lands with those suckers, just a hair shy of my mag box. One of those Kwik Klip conversions.
|
Mag box is the final denominator.
Referencing the books OAL leaves lots to interpret.
At any rate the 25’06 is a 52000-53000 CUP cartridge, and you’re only just judging that threshold with the 4350, and at 52 gr with the 4831, your likely south of 50000 CUP.
Perhaps 4955, or 7977, or 7828, or RL23, or RL22 need a try.
__________________
There are no absolutes
|
03-30-2020, 12:21 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 509
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by roper1
You guys chiming in with some helpful advice take a bow!! It's what makes this place so good. Thanks!
|
^^^ I'll probably end up coming back to his thread over and over throughout the summer. Right now I will just try to get back into the swing of reloading. In terms of shooting practice, ie having my wife shoot at a 8" gong at 200 yards, so not worrying about measure accuracy or speed, how old of power would you still use? I have some old stuff that has been stored appropriately but some is close to 20 years old.
|
03-30-2020, 04:03 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,614
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prairiekid
^^^ I'll probably end up coming back to his thread over and over throughout the summer. Right now I will just try to get back into the swing of reloading. In terms of shooting practice, ie having my wife shoot at a 8" gong at 200 yards, so not worrying about measure accuracy or speed, how old of power would you still use? I have some old stuff that has been stored appropriately but some is close to 20 years old.
|
If the powder is kept cool and dry, in a sealed container, it can last 50-60 years without issue. Smelling the powder is a good indicator of its condition, a solvent or ether like smell is good, a bitter acrid smell is bad. Rusty coloured powder on the kernels is a dead give away to powder going bad as well.
__________________
There are no absolutes
|
03-30-2020, 05:20 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 39
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger CS
I get similar results with IMR compared to Hodgdon 4831. I really can not say I have determined one works better than the other in my particular rifle.
I do like the Hodgdon Short Cut simply because it drops a little easier out of the powder measure. Then again I way each load anyway. I am sure you know from your data charts that IMR and Hodgdon are not the same and have different Minimum and Maximum load values.
|
Thanks Ranger! I’m not sure what I’ll try first. I’m still setting up a bench to do all of this! I was interested in trying the Hodgkin short cut for the same reasons you mentioned. Thanks for the info!
|
04-02-2020, 03:02 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 509
|
|
If I pull the bullet on a Barnes factory round. Is there anyway to know what powder it is or would you just be taking your best guess?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 AM.
|