Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 10-03-2017, 04:16 PM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoneFishingEDM View Post
Just to clear up. the one without a license panicked, the one with the license assumed since she was not fishing the person fishing would be covered. I agree, not thinking clearly.
Now I'll tell you what probably DOES happen a thousand times a year.... when the F&W boat is spotted the one with the license just takes the rod... Your dummies got confused and got it backwards.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsAdvocate View Post
In this case Oki has cut to to the exact heart of the matter!
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 10-03-2017, 04:58 PM
Brian Adams Brian Adams is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
when the F&W boat is spotted the one with the license just takes the rod
And then has 2 rods.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 10-04-2017, 10:28 AM
CMichaud's Avatar
CMichaud CMichaud is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Beijing, Canada
Posts: 1,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xbolt7mm View Post
Same thing should happen to her as the two metis that were charged for netting without a licence, throw the book at all three of them. What she did was worse than the metis, at least they didn't use another licence from another person.
I must be missing something. What happened to the metis guys?

Do you have a link or is this an attempt at sarcasm?
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 10-04-2017, 11:15 AM
Ken07AOVette's Avatar
Ken07AOVette Ken07AOVette is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 24,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
Now I'll tell you what probably DOES happen a thousand times a year.... when the F&W boat is spotted the one with the license just takes the rod... Your dummies got confused and got it backwards.
They watch with binoculars from an elevated or hidden position or from a distance far enough away so as not to be seen by idiots breaking the law. They are not stupid.

You can throw the rods overboard, they still only have to attest in court that they serveilled the 'alleged perpetrators' committing the illegal act for it to be admissible in court. Or they use a camera or cell phone for proof.

And you are right about dummies. Licenses are cheap and easy to acquire.
__________________
Only dead fish go with the flow. The rest use their brains in life.


Originally Posted by Twisted Canuck
I wasn't thinking far enough ahead for an outcome, I was ranting. By definition, a rant doesn't imply much forethought.....
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 10-04-2017, 11:38 AM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Adams View Post
And then has 2 rods.
If the other person handed the OP's daughter-in-law his/her license, I would assume the license holder wasn't fishing.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsAdvocate View Post
In this case Oki has cut to to the exact heart of the matter!
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 10-04-2017, 03:49 PM
Brian Adams Brian Adams is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
If the other person handed the OP's daughter-in-law his/her license, I would assume the license holder wasn't fishing.
You were not talking about the OP.
You were talking about something
else that happens a thousand times
a year.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 10-04-2017, 08:10 PM
Isopod Isopod is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CMichaud View Post
I must be missing something. What happened to the metis guys?

Do you have a link or is this an attempt at sarcasm?
I'm not the OP, but I assumed it was sarcasm and that they were referring to this story:

https://globalnews.ca/news/3750312/p...-near-conklin/
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 11-20-2017, 12:03 PM
GoneFishingEDM GoneFishingEDM is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 74
Default

So the outcome of all this was a simple fine of $115.00. .
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 11-20-2017, 01:05 PM
Albertadiver's Avatar
Albertadiver Albertadiver is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoneFishingEDM View Post
So the outcome of all this was a simple fine of $115.00. .
Bet there was some relief there!
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 11-20-2017, 02:31 PM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoneFishingEDM View Post
So the outcome of all this was a simple fine of $115.00. .
And a life lessen.
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.