I'll vote for the lower range variable as well. At least that's what works best for me. Heck, I like them down as low as 2-7X but also have a couple of coyote rifles that carry 3-9X. Here's why...
When I first started shooting coyotes seriously I would ALWAYS overestimate how far away those two and three hundred yarders were and shoot over them. To help get a higher hit average on those I started using my scope as as a range finder. I found that the heavy pickets on most duplex reticles will bracket a 100 yd coyote from top of shoulder to bottom of chest at about 5 or 6X. (coyotes around here average 11 inches in this dimension). From there, estimating range is just a matter of proportion.
Armed with that knowledge, I started setting my scope's power adjustment accordingly and now just leave it there all the time. It gives me instant and surprisingly accurate range info out to about 400 yds. As a bonus I find that power setting is fine for close in calling action and plenty of magnification for 400 yds. And with my rifle sighted in at 200 yds any coyote inside that quarter mile is in serious trouble. While you will run into longer shots, this will cover 99% of your shooting.
Of course, if you do run into something longer and have the time to dial-up a higher power, that has the potential to make you bullet placement more precise, and makes a good arguement for the higher power scope. But whatever you do, make sure your scope has the capability to go down into the 4-7 range and has a duplex X-hair so you can use that bracketing trick. After that if you don't mind the extra size and weight of a larger scope, go for it.
triggerpress
|