Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-24-2008, 11:31 AM
Mike_W's Avatar
Mike_W Mike_W is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 6,433
Default 7mm WSM v.s. 270 WSM

Well after much contemplation I think I have settled on a browning x-bolt for several reasons. Sub MOA out of the box, magazine, feather trigger, dura touch synthetic stock, weight and fit/feel to myself.

Now I am trying to settle on a caliber. I curretly have a 270 win and 300 win mag, I know another rifle is not nessasary but I want one.

I have been trying to deside between a 7mm WSM and a 270 WSM.

I want a gun that will be flat shooting and be able to punch out at least 150 grains. From what I've seen these two cartridges are basically the same case except a larger .284" bullet and a .277" bullet .....maybe the 7mm WSM has a every so slightly larger case.

Looking breifly over BC's the .284" bullet at 160 grains is .531 to a .480 150grain in the .277" bullet shooting at basically the same velocity. Therefore the 160 7mm should shoot flatter that a 150 270.

i think I am leaning towards the 7mm but wanted to get some members opinions on these cartriges and also the rifle of choice.

I will be handloading FYI.

Thanks,
Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-24-2008, 12:13 PM
Scott N's Avatar
Scott N Scott N is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,511
Default

I own a 270 WSM and love it. That being said, since you handload, there are far more 7mm bullets available to handloaders than there are for the 270s. If you were limited to factory ammo I would probably say go for the 270 WSM because the 7mm WSM didn't seem to catch on as well as the 270 and 300 WSMs, and I don't think factory ammo is as readily available as it is for the 270 WSM. Being a handloader gives you a lot more bullet weight selections for the 7mm than for the 270.

Since you already own a 270 Win (a WSM doesn't offer that much over the standard 270), I'd say go with the 7mm.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2008, 12:25 PM
MK2750's Avatar
MK2750 MK2750 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sylvan Lake
Posts: 3,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott N View Post
I own a 270 WSM and love it. That being said, since you handload, there are far more 7mm bullets available to handloaders than there are for the 270s. If you were limited to factory ammo I would probably say go for the 270 WSM because the 7mm WSM didn't seem to catch on as well as the 270 and 300 WSMs, and I don't think factory ammo is as readily available as it is for the 270 WSM. Being a handloader gives you a lot more bullet weight selections for the 7mm than for the 270.

Since you already own a 270 Win (a WSM doesn't offer that much over the standard 270), I'd say go with the 7mm.

X2 on this unless you want to sell at some point. The 270 WSM seems to be a lot more popular and has already developed a following.

I was considering the same rifle in 300 WSM until I saw it is availiable in 280 Rem and am also now undecided.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-24-2008, 12:41 PM
Cal Cal is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: slave lake
Posts: 4,221
Default

Why a wsm? I dont get the hype about fat little cases, the 7mm rem mag would split the difference between the two calibers that you own quite nicely. Feeds better, handles a wide range of bullets better, ammo costs less and is easyer to find
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-24-2008, 12:58 PM
Leverboy Leverboy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 309
Default

Your splitting hairs and quibbling over ballistics between two cartridges that wouldn't amount to any practical difference in the field. Two many redundant cartridges amounts to too many people masterbating over ballistics charts.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-24-2008, 01:08 PM
Scott N's Avatar
Scott N Scott N is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leverboy View Post
Your splitting hairs and quibbling over ballistics between two cartridges that wouldn't amount to any practical difference in the field. Two many redundant cartridges amounts to too many people masterbating over ballistics charts.
I can't argue with your logic, but a guy can never have too many rifles!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-24-2008, 01:52 PM
Leverboy Leverboy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 309
Default

Exactly, i would go with the caliber thats offered in the rifle that you desire. if both calibers come in the same rifle you want, then you have another problem!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-24-2008, 02:03 PM
surface2feather's Avatar
surface2feather surface2feather is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 606
Default 7mm WSM

I own an A bolt 7WSM, and I really like it so far. It has a decent kick to it but is very manageable. I can shoot 2" groups at 100 yards without a problem but have only achieved a few 1" groups at that distance. That being said I haven't shot that much in the past so there are certainly shooter ous there who can achieve better. As far as factory ammo goes I have only found 140-160 gr bullets made by 3 or 4 manufacturers, if your reloading you can of course get a much larger variation. I haven't been able to do much long range shooting, but out to 300 yards the gun shoots very flat. I have mine sighted in at 100 yards about 1 3/4 high, which puts it on the bullseye at 50 yards and in the neighbourhood of the bullse at 250 yards.
__________________
Don't get any gum in your hair.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-24-2008, 02:03 PM
7RUM 7RUM is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott N View Post
I can't argue with your logic, but a guy can never have too many rifles!
Get them both. You can never have too many rifles.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-24-2008, 05:45 PM
RUM's Avatar
RUM RUM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Okotoks, AB
Posts: 480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MK2750 View Post
X2 on this unless you want to sell at some point. The 270 WSM seems to be a lot more popular and has already developed a following.
x3, and the above is a good point aswell. Likely be easier to sell a 270WSM than a 7mmWSM which makes no sense to me, but that's the way it is! I have had both and prefer the 7WSM simply for the reason of more bullet options. Other than that, as stated, there is no real difference between the 2. Both are fantastic calibers that can be used for anything you will hunt on this continent, although I think there are better options out there for the big bears!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-24-2008, 08:32 PM
mulecrazy's Avatar
mulecrazy mulecrazy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Drumheller
Posts: 2,666
Default

I too was in the same dilemma as you are. After looking at the ballistic charts and comparing increases over the originals. I found that the 7MM WSM is pretty close to the 7 rem mag in ballistics. The 270WSM however destroyed the 270 win. I found it actually had the same or close to the same energy as the 7mm WSM at the longer distances. As well if you look around for 270 bullets you can find them with ballistic coefficients of well over .500. For anyone who questions anyon who would shoot a WSM I would suggest giving it an honest trial. I love the short action, It is much quicker and easier to reload. I also believe that having the shorter action limits the overall weight of the gun as well. I have never had a gun feel as nice and comfortable to shoot as my Tikka T3 hunter. I it.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-24-2008, 09:40 PM
Lorne Lorne is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Grande Prairie
Posts: 136
Default

I bought a Sako 75 270WSM.It did not take me long to become a fan.I took a couple of decent deer with it.It is fast becoming my favourite deer rifle.

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-24-2008, 10:21 PM
WSM WSM is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wetaskiwin County
Posts: 124
Default

Good luck finding a 7mm WSM. I am also looking for a x-bolt 7mm WSM in a stainless and syn stock. I have been looking for one for about 5 months. I also have my name on hold with everybody that has ordered one from browning. So if you are looking for a gun this season that is going to come in play. If you find one in either caliber buy it. No second chances somebody else will be coming behind you and will buy it.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-25-2008, 12:34 AM
twofifty twofifty is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: S.E. British Columbia
Posts: 4,579
Default

Originally Posted by Leverboy
Your splitting hairs and quibbling over ballistics between two cartridges that wouldn't amount to any practical difference in the field. Two many redundant cartridges amounts to too many people masterbating over ballistics charts.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott N View Post
I can't argue with your logic, but a guy can never have too many rifles!
Mike_W, don'tcha sometimes wonder how many #1 Irons you actually need? Why not something different, like a medium bore or a fast 24 or 25 cal?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-25-2008, 12:57 AM
Rocks's Avatar
Rocks Rocks is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 2,260
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_W View Post
Well after much contemplation I think I have settled on a browning x-bolt for several reasons. Sub MOA out of the box, magazine, feather trigger, dura touch synthetic stock, weight and fit/feel to myself.

Now I am trying to settle on a caliber. I curretly have a 270 win and 300 win mag, I know another rifle is not nessasary but I want one.

I have been trying to deside between a 7mm WSM and a 270 WSM.

I want a gun that will be flat shooting and be able to punch out at least 150 grains. From what I've seen these two cartridges are basically the same case except a larger .284" bullet and a .277" bullet .....maybe the 7mm WSM has a every so slightly larger case.

Looking breifly over BC's the .284" bullet at 160 grains is .531 to a .480 150grain in the .277" bullet shooting at basically the same velocity. Therefore the 160 7mm should shoot flatter that a 150 270.

i think I am leaning towards the 7mm but wanted to get some members opinions on these cartriges and also the rifle of choice.

I will be handloading FYI.

Thanks,
Mike
Go for the 270wsm. You're already loading for the 270, and the 7mm shorty won't give you anything more than what you've got. I've got a 270wsm and it kills everything I shoot at cleanly! You need something bigger and you've already got it in the 300...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-25-2008, 05:24 PM
gramps73's Avatar
gramps73 gramps73 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,297
Default

270 wsm all the way got and love it..
G
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-26-2008, 02:25 AM
Mike_W's Avatar
Mike_W Mike_W is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 6,433
Default

Well thanks for all the help and advice still confused as the census was a little on both sides.

Any thoughts on the rifle choice


Thanks
Mike
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-26-2008, 05:24 AM
falco's Avatar
falco falco is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cold Lake, Alta.
Posts: 197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_W View Post
Well thanks for all the help and advice still confused as the census was a little on both sides.

Any thoughts on the rifle choice


Thanks
Mike
I love my Tikka T3 lite in 270 wsm. It's my first tikka so I don't know if their all like this but it has a very nice trigger.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-26-2008, 06:12 AM
mulecrazy's Avatar
mulecrazy mulecrazy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Drumheller
Posts: 2,666
Default

The Tikka T3 has a really nice smooth action. I love mine. I went with the T3 Hunter as I didn't like the feel of their sythetic stock. I would suggest heading to a good gun shop with a lot of variety and feel a few in your hands. Everyone likes the feel a little different.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-26-2008, 07:05 AM
Tundra Monkey's Avatar
Tundra Monkey Tundra Monkey is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Prosperous Lake, NT
Posts: 5,633
Default

I'm gonna agree with Scott on this one.

You handload so 7mm all the way.

tm
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-26-2008, 11:16 AM
Battery's Avatar
Battery Battery is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 920
Default

I have a remmington 270 and my dad shoots a sako 7mm, personally i prefer the 270 but when i shoot the 7mm i love it too, sako is a really good make. i shot a remmington 7mm and will never shoot it again.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-26-2008, 11:32 AM
harv3589's Avatar
harv3589 harv3589 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,641
Default

Sako 85 in a 270WSM, you won't regret it....great caliber and an outstanding rifle maker.
__________________
“If you could kick the person in the pants responsible for most of your trouble, you wouldn’t sit for a month.”
—Theodore Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-26-2008, 04:03 PM
blackpheasant's Avatar
blackpheasant blackpheasant is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 4,257
Default

Just picked up a new .270 WSM Browning A bolt with VX 3 3.5-10-50 had her out on the weekend for sight in and was WOWED! I love this gun already, November can't come soon enough, recoil no problem, grouping was awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-27-2008, 08:45 PM
Cal Cal is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: slave lake
Posts: 4,221
Default

the 270 wsm did not "destroy" the 270 win intill they started tuning the 270win the loads down. It was a bit better for sure but the only way I would say that the 270 wsm "destroyed" the 270 win was that they had to tune down the 270 win loads in order to sell the wsm. Thats just my theory on why they did it but I dont know why else it was done. the 270 win was always loaded in modern hunting actions so them doing it out of concern for the public's saftety makes no sense. They havnt tuned down the 30-06 and there are more sketchy old guns in that caliber than most other cartridges.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-21-2008, 05:27 PM
BigChrome
 
Posts: n/a
Default

have a browning X bolt 270wsm mag love it just sold my 7mm to buy this gun wont being going back to the 7mm 270 wsm shoots flat equiped with Leupold 3X9X50
good groopin, within 1 Inch basically all the good stuff you hear is true
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-21-2008, 06:29 PM
sbtennex's Avatar
sbtennex sbtennex is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: West Central Alberta
Posts: 534
Default

7mm. More bullet selection, wider range of weights and heavier if you need. Extra case capacity equals more oomph. Better SD and a 7WSM is on my list too, even though I have a 7mmRM and a 7mm-08. I'll probably build one though - got me eye on a 26" Broughton barrel and I'm GOING to have one that'll shoot 6" groups at 1000 yards. 7mmWSM is the best of the bunch, IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-21-2008, 09:42 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_W View Post
Well thanks for all the help and advice still confused as the census was a little on both sides.

Any thoughts on the rifle choice


Thanks
Mike
Well, I can maybe help you there.
The 7WSM is not nearly so popular as the 270.
The 270 is generally considered the best of the WSM line because of its velocity gain over the standard 270WIN.
Its ammo availability is testament to its popularity as well.
I like it because there is lots of 270WSM brass to neck down to 6.5!!
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-22-2008, 06:05 AM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,621
Default

Come on lets debate the .275 Rigby vs. the 7x57.

Or maybe the 7mm Remington Express vs 280 Remington.

And when we are done that we will have a lively debate about the merits of one brand of pick up truck versus another.

OUCH, I just bit my tongue.
__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-22-2008, 09:54 AM
EagleEye54 EagleEye54 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 130
Default

The 270 WSM is the only WSM that makes any ballistic improvement over the tried and truth existing models. But I'd still buy a 270 WIN or 7mm Mag over any WSM. Don't like 'em and never will. Oh and yes, I have tried them.

Since you already have the bases covered with your big game rifles, why not a varmint rig instead? You can have a whole lot more fun for a longer time (all year) with a varmint rifle.

Last edited by EagleEye54; 11-24-2008 at 10:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-22-2008, 12:09 PM
The Bit Runner. The Bit Runner. is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: lacombe area
Posts: 1,881
Default 270swm

I just had a 270swm built at corlanes in dawson creek,Pacnor bbl and a mpi stock,browning a bolt,25" bbl with a range finder burris scope on it,Flutes and all the other good stuff that goes with it,Sure looks nice,havent even shot it yet and ive had it 6 months,something tells me im working to DAM much.Everything in i think i got 3400 into that rifle,it better be a 1 hole gun for that price.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.