Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-02-2024, 11:31 AM
Map Maker Map Maker is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 1,539
Default High Speed Rail

Surprised there is no discussion on the high speed rail from Calgary to Edmonton.

I'm all for a feasibility master study to see if it makes sense.
Do it now when its cheaper.

https://edmontonjournal.com/news/pol...il-master-plan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-02-2024, 11:44 AM
Trochu's Avatar
Trochu Trochu is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,752
Default

They've been talking about this for a long time, think it was 2022 it was going to be a hyperloop, before that it was a train.

I'm personally all for it, but they have to do it right, aka, cheap and fast. It it takes 3 hours to drive, they can't think this is going to work if it's 2.5 hr trip at $50/person in the train kinda thing. Thirty to forty-five minutes, 20 bucks, I'm in!
__________________
I hope I don't vote for Biden when I'm dead!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-02-2024, 12:17 PM
Cement Bench's Avatar
Cement Bench Cement Bench is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: alberta
Posts: 1,982
Default

2 much money we are broke as a province and the cities are not run efficiently at all
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-02-2024, 12:30 PM
Moe Moe is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 249
Default

Gunter wrote a good article on why at this time, it is not economically viable
https://edmontonsun.com/opinion/colu...ork-in-alberta
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-02-2024, 01:13 PM
Fradaburidi Fradaburidi is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 159
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trochu View Post
cheap and fast
There are three level of service: cheap, fast, good. You can choose only two of any.

Fast and good will not be cheap.
Cheap and good will not be fast.
Cheap and fast will not be good.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-02-2024, 01:15 PM
Fradaburidi Fradaburidi is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 159
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cement Bench View Post
we are broke as a province
Even more broke as a country.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-02-2024, 01:28 PM
muirsy muirsy is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 454
Default

It'll never happen, we just don't have the population density like in Europe where it makes much more sense.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-02-2024, 01:34 PM
Fradaburidi Fradaburidi is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 159
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trochu View Post
If it takes 3 hours to drive, they can't think this is going to work if it's 2.5 hr trip at $50/person in the train kinda thing. Thirty to forty-five minutes, 20 bucks, I'm in!
Some would prefer even a 2.5 hr trip at $50/person than 3 or more hours of driving.

The question is if there is enough people that will use it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-02-2024, 01:44 PM
Geraldsh Geraldsh is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 351
Default

Since 1981 there have been 6 different studies done, shouldn’t be wasting money on another study until our population at least doubles.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-02-2024, 02:26 PM
colvert's Avatar
colvert colvert is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muirsy View Post
It'll never happen, we just don't have the population density like in Europe where it makes much more sense.
exactly
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-02-2024, 03:55 PM
Trochu's Avatar
Trochu Trochu is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,752
Default

If they are going to do it, I'd rather they do it now though for the need in 15 years than figure out it's viable in 15 years, then have it ready another 10 from then, at how many billions more than it would cost to build today. Keep in mind this could easily be a 5-10 year project, if started now, it's not like it's going to be up and running in 2025.
__________________
I hope I don't vote for Biden when I'm dead!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-02-2024, 05:07 PM
hayseed's Avatar
hayseed hayseed is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,658
Default

I would rather have a flying car……

Not electric though..cords not near long enough
__________________
Death can have me..... when it earns it..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-02-2024, 05:52 PM
CNP's Avatar
CNP CNP is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: WMU 303
Posts: 8,505
Default

Flying between these two cities is just plain xxxxxx. Driving or bussing are the only viable options. High speed rail is investing in the future. Trains operating at more than double the hwy 2 speed is a piece of cake.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-03-2024, 01:16 AM
calgarychef calgarychef is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,717
Default

I lived in England for awhile and used the trains a lot, so it’s not like I’m against train travel.

So you get on in Calgary and get off in Edmonton… where’s your vehicle?
In Calgary. How do you get around? These trains are good for workers commuting to the office, or travelling with a small suitcase. How many people will commute to either city for work? How many are going for a vacation?

There’s not the population
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-03-2024, 04:16 AM
HyperMOA HyperMOA is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton (shudder)
Posts: 4,654
Default

If they built a high speed rail the Edmonton international would go broke. I will take a train to calgary to catch direct flights instead of always having to connect from Edmonton.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-03-2024, 05:38 AM
Pioneer2 Pioneer2 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,341
Default How about first

Finishing the pipeline to the Pacific.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-03-2024, 07:26 AM
lannie lannie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CNP
Posts: 3,769
Default

I am all for it the moment private business puts the money out for it without being at gun point. Publicly funded is private business putting the money out at gunpoint.
__________________
You are what you do, not what you say.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-03-2024, 07:46 AM
-JR- -JR- is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edm.
Posts: 4,994
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarychef View Post
I lived in England for awhile and used the trains a lot, so it’s not like I’m against train travel.

So you get on in Calgary and get off in Edmonton… where’s your vehicle?
In Calgary. How do you get around? These trains are good for workers commuting to the office, or travelling with a small suitcase. How many people will commute to either city for work? How many are going for a vacation?

There’s not the population
2x How do you get around town with out a car once you get there .
Might be ok if your visiting some one for the day and they pick you up .
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-03-2024, 07:54 AM
pikergolf's Avatar
pikergolf pikergolf is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,425
Default

I don't know if it makes economic sense but it would get used like crazy. The business travel between the two cities alone has to be huge. Time savings alone would drive it. Hop it a cab get to where you need to be, have your meeting, cab it back to the station and take the train home. No brainer from that stand point.
__________________
“One of the sad signs of our times is that we have demonized those who produce, subsidized those who refuse to produce, and canonized those who complain.”

Thomas Sowell
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-03-2024, 08:02 AM
densa44 densa44 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North of Cochrane
Posts: 6,698
Smile Getting Canadians out of their cars?

This idea is about 50 years too late. Now with cars that drive themselves and the price of new cars, it will almost impossible to get people to park and take the train.

Time to start working on other problems.

As far as the provincial economy is concerned, it used to be that we spent 1/3 more dollars than we taxed for. In otherwords we are living on non renewable resource revenue. There is a "train" coming at us through the tunnel!
__________________
"The well meaning have done more damage than all the criminals in the world" Great grand father "Never impute planning where incompetence will predict the phenomenon equally well" Father
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-03-2024, 08:04 AM
flydude flydude is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Canada's Florida
Posts: 174
Default

What a great concept. Imagine all the Calgarians that would commute to Edmonton to watch a real hockey team?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-03-2024, 08:31 AM
sirmike68 sirmike68 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fort Saskatchewan
Posts: 621
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarychef View Post
i lived in england for awhile and used the trains a lot, so it’s not like i’m against train travel.

So you get on in calgary and get off in edmonton… where’s your vehicle?
In calgary. How do you get around? These trains are good for workers commuting to the office, or travelling with a small suitcase. How many people will commute to either city for work? How many are going for a vacation?

There’s not the population
this x2
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-03-2024, 09:29 AM
altex altex is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trochu View Post
If they are going to do it, I'd rather they do it now though for the need in 15 years than figure out it's viable in 15 years, then have it ready another 10 from then, at how many billions more than it would cost to build today. Keep in mind this could easily be a 5-10 year project, if started now, it's not like it's going to be up and running in 2025.
Agreed 100% . The population is growing as we speak. Should be build now while it's cheaper.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-03-2024, 10:24 AM
Glas Ó Cairealláin Glas Ó Cairealláin is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 57
Default

I believe it's already a go already. I think it's already been approved.

https://majorprojects.alberta.ca/det...Rail-Line/4494

https://www.prairielink.ca/
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-03-2024, 10:26 AM
Geraldsh Geraldsh is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 351
Default

I would be in favour of an actual build now but all we are getting is another 5 million dollar study.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-03-2024, 11:57 AM
MegaHorn's Avatar
MegaHorn MegaHorn is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 60
Default

In the 1980s Toshiba was going to build this train between the cities until the Alberta Government shut it down. How do I know this? My dad worked for AGT and IBM in the 70s and 80s. It's wild the amount of corruption that went on.

The more I thon about it we must be living inside a computer. We have no choice. Only choice is to not vote
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-03-2024, 03:59 PM
Stinky Buffalo's Avatar
Stinky Buffalo Stinky Buffalo is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: A bit North o' Center...
Posts: 11,230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pikergolf View Post
I don't know if it makes economic sense but it would get used like crazy. The business travel between the two cities alone has to be huge. Time savings alone would drive it. Hop it a cab get to where you need to be, have your meeting, cab it back to the station and take the train home. No brainer from that stand point.
That's true - I used to make that hop to Calgary quite often. I've met MLAs on those flights, they would be one of the more frequent fliers on that route.

I could see students and tourists making good use of it as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HyperMOA View Post
If they built a high speed rail the Edmonton international would go broke. I will take a train to calgary to catch direct flights instead of always having to connect from Edmonton.
Oh for sure! I have wasted so much time switching planes in Calgary... If I could have caught a fast train to Calgary somewhere in E-Town, it would save me almost an hour of commuting to the EIA as well.

I used to love the EIA, back in the days when it actually had more direct flights.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flydude View Post
What a great concept. Imagine all the Calgarians that would commute to Edmonton to watch a real hockey team?
This, 100%!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-04-2024, 08:32 AM
graybeard graybeard is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pioneer2 View Post
Finishing the pipeline to the Pacific.
^^ RIGHT THERE ^^^

Lets get all the high priority stuff that needs finishing, finished. Then, lets look at a new train in say 2074.....

How about a reliable bus line again....servicing people and cargo?
__________________
Life is like baseball; it is the number of times you reach home safely, that counts.

We have two lives: The life we learn with and the life we live with after that.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-04-2024, 09:18 AM
stubblejumper01 stubblejumper01 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Busby AB
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graybeard View Post
^^ RIGHT THERE ^^^

Lets get all the high priority stuff that needs finishing, finished. Then, lets look at a new train in say 2074.....

How about a reliable bus line again....servicing people and cargo?
That’s for sure. I grew up in Saskatchewan and we would visit relatives in Alberta every summer. On the way home all us kids would be exhausted and we would be snoozing. I can clearly remember that we would always wake up as soon as we crossed the border as the roads were always worse in Saskatchewan.
Now it’s the opposite. We need to repair a lot of highways in our province.
Also I think we should be looking at upgrading the power grid as we are already at capacity and once we are forced to drive electric vehicles we won’t have the infrastructure to handle the needs. We need way more capacity there long before we need the rail line.
As to bus routes unfortunately they would have to be subsidized by the taxpayers as they are not very profitable. There’s way more need for services to our smaller communities than there is for the rail line
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-04-2024, 02:57 PM
Map Maker Map Maker is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 1,539
Default

I agree with the thinking of starting to plan and build now before it becomes a necessity.
Is there anyone that disagrees hwy 2 was a bad investment for the province?
But I’m sure a lot of people were saying it was a waste of money back then.
Calgary Edmonton with red deer stop over has been a major transportation route for a millennium.
Train, freight, Powerlines, pipelines . Build the infrastructure to support it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.