Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-03-2016, 10:59 PM
IamI IamI is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 14
Default Any suggestion on the handheld depth sounder/finder?

looking for a handheld depth sounder/finder on the ice, can shoot through ice and give out the thickness of ice and water depth.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03-2016, 11:48 PM
FlyTheory's Avatar
FlyTheory FlyTheory is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamI View Post
looking for a handheld depth sounder/finder on the ice, can shoot through ice and give out the thickness of ice and water depth.
I've got the Blackhawk (I think that's what it's called). It works if there's no snow on the ice, nor any significant bubbles in the ice. I use an auger and drill down 2" into the clear ice and then transmit the signal. It's handy compared to drilling and dropping a strong down. Sometime you need to fill the hole with a little water for proper transmission. And for flood ice you will have to drill down the the clear ice before you take your reading. Large learning curve but it's generally worth it! Got mine at the fishin hole for $120. It won't tell you the thickness of ice though
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-04-2016, 10:17 AM
IamI IamI is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyTheory View Post
I've got the Blackhawk (I think that's what it's called). It works if there's no snow on the ice, nor any significant bubbles in the ice. I use an auger and drill down 2" into the clear ice and then transmit the signal. It's handy compared to drilling and dropping a strong down. Sometime you need to fill the hole with a little water for proper transmission. And for flood ice you will have to drill down the the clear ice before you take your reading. Large learning curve but it's generally worth it! Got mine at the fishin hole for $120. It won't tell you the thickness of ice though
thank you very much for your experience.

I guess yours is hawkeye as:

http://www.thefishinhole.com/index.c...ONAR/&se=25885
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-04-2016, 11:22 AM
FlyTheory's Avatar
FlyTheory FlyTheory is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,480
Default

That's the one! Feel free to message me with any questions or troubleshooting it's a useful tool to have, and on early ice it's magic. I'd reccomend you purchase one!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-04-2016, 05:15 PM
RavYak's Avatar
RavYak RavYak is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West Edmonton
Posts: 5,174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyTheory View Post
That's the one! Feel free to message me with any questions or troubleshooting it's a useful tool to have, and on early ice it's magic. I'd reccomend you purchase one!
That is interesting. I take it you have to have it pressed against the ice or just under water? Also do you find the accuracy depends on how you hold it(if at an angle etc)?

Almost any flasher/fish finder can shoot through ice and give you a reading but I have found it to be unreliable especially once the ice gets thicker or if there is any layer of bad ice. We used to try and shoot through the ice but realized we were wasting more time trying to do so then just drilling a hole and checking. I guess if you only have a hand auger it would be worth doing though.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-04-2016, 08:49 PM
stubblejumper01 stubblejumper01 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Busby AB
Posts: 837
Default

I also have the Hawkeye. I use it to shoot through old frozen over holes to check depth. It even sometimes shows fish on screen too. I primarily use it for depth though. Makes it quick to find the depth I want at Canyon Creek and the Narrows on Slave. Just pour a little water and you're good to go
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-04-2016, 09:10 PM
bogwalker bogwalker is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: calgary for now
Posts: 134
Default

I have a hawkeye 1c which is a full color full range fish finder. runs on 4AAA lithium batteries. has a flasher mode for ice fishing and regular sonar type mode. have tested it in the shushwap and works real good.. http://www.hawkeyeelectronics.com/fish-finder/
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-04-2016, 09:13 PM
WayneChristie's Avatar
WayneChristie WayneChristie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 12,773
Default

I use a hawkeye as well, usually just carry a waterbottle with me to shoot through the ice. great tool to save a lot of hole drilling if you are looking for drop offs and structure. also use it in the tinner and canoe in open water when Im fishing unfamiliar waters.
__________________
Dinos
681

Shove your masks and your vaccines
Non Compliance!!!!!!
"According to Trudeau, Im an extremist who needs to be dealt with"
#Trudeau must go

Wheres The Funds

The vaccine was not brought in for COVID. COVID was brought in for the vaccine. Once you realize that, everything else makes sense.” ~ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-04-2016, 09:28 PM
EZM's Avatar
EZM EZM is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 11,858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WayneChristie View Post
I use a hawkeye as well, usually just carry a waterbottle with me to shoot through the ice. great tool to save a lot of hole drilling if you are looking for drop offs and structure. also use it in the tinner and canoe in open water when Im fishing unfamiliar waters.
I have also had good results with kicking any snow away and pouring a little water on the ice.

Lay the transducer down on the wet spot and it should provide good readings.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-05-2016, 12:09 AM
Isopod Isopod is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 464
Default

My fishing buddy has an older model hand-held depth finder, bought about 15 or 20 years ago. It looks pretty much like a flashlight, I think it is called Polar something, but not certain on that. At any rate, it gives depth to the bottom very accurately and since he's had it so long it has certainly proven reliable over the years. We use it every ice-fishing trip. You do need relatively clear ice, and a small layer of water to form a bridge between the depth finder and the ice... other people's frozen-over ice fishing holes are very reliable places to measure. It has proven invaluable for finding the depth to the bottom, particularly for locating features like drop-offs where depth can change quickly over short distances and setting up right on the drop off can be the key to good fishing.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-05-2016, 12:33 PM
Dubious Dubious is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,521
Default

I just take the fish finder off my boat for the winter. If you put a little bit of water on top of the ice it will read right to the bottom so you can see the depths. If the water is murky or dark I just clamp it to a piece of wood and my fishing bucket drop the transducer just down the hole and read the screen like normal. Worked pretty good and it could be a lot cheaper
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-05-2016, 12:50 PM
dodgeboy1979's Avatar
dodgeboy1979 dodgeboy1979 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Lloydminster Alberta
Posts: 1,298
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EZM View Post
I have also had good results with kicking any snow away and pouring a little water on the ice.

Lay the transducer down on the wet spot and it should provide good readings.
this is what i do with my flasher and it works awesome
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-05-2016, 04:21 PM
PerchBuster PerchBuster is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 562
Default

I've got the blue coloured one and it also will show if a fish is below and has a fish alarm on it. Works good for checking depth quickly. Just add water on top of the ice and set it down for a reading. Great for walk ons when trying to hit and set up on a specific depth contour without drilling a bunch of holes to get there. I don't walk on much anymore and usually just drill holes until I find fish with the camera regardless of the depth. If interested I would sell mine as I don't use it very much anymore the last year or 2. PM me if you want to buy a used one. Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-05-2016, 08:48 PM
cschache's Avatar
cschache cschache is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 504
Default

I didn't see a mention unless I missed it is the Marcum LX-I, been pondering on buying one, still in my research stages unless someone can give some feed back on it?
__________________
The mark of a man is not found in his past,
but how he overcomes adversity and builds his future.
Quitting is not an option.
Regardless of the overwhelming odds or obstacles in your path,
you always have an opportunity to overcome.
It is your attitude that will determine the outcome.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-05-2016, 09:25 PM
RavYak's Avatar
RavYak RavYak is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West Edmonton
Posts: 5,174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cschache View Post
I didn't see a mention unless I missed it is the Marcum LX-I, been pondering on buying one, still in my research stages unless someone can give some feed back on it?
I was interested to learn more about these after seeing them in the fishin hole. They have the Marcum LX-I's and the Hawkeyes.

The LX-i's are twice the price but are more powerful(rated to 300 feet vs 200 feet for the Hawkeye) and they use a narrower beam(12 deg vs 25 deg) which means they will be more accurate on steep drop offs etc(wider beam hits more ground and will return the highest point it hits). The LX-i also comes with a case and its display is on the top which I would think would be nicer to use.

Like most things you get what you pay for, from the sounds of it the Hawkeye is good enough for the average fisherman but if you want the best or if you fish deep waters a lot for say lakers then the LX-i would be the way to go.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-05-2016, 09:37 PM
cschache's Avatar
cschache cschache is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 504
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RavYak View Post
I was interested to learn more about these after seeing them in the fishin hole. They have the Marcum LX-I's and the Hawkeyes.

The LX-i's are twice the price but are more powerful(rated to 300 feet vs 200 feet for the Hawkeye) and they use a narrower beam(12 deg vs 25 deg) which means they will be more accurate on steep drop offs etc(wider beam hits more ground and will return the highest point it hits). The LX-i also comes with a case and its display is on the top which I would think would be nicer to use.

Like most things you get what you pay for, from the sounds of it the Hawkeye is good enough for the average fisherman but if you want the best or if you fish deep waters a lot for say lakers then the LX-i would be the way to go.
Thanks RavYak, there is always some new gadget that I think I need but I like to move around and find the fish and I think one of these would save me time by not drilling so many holes to find drop offs etc. thanks for the info, I think I will purchase one! what's a couple of hundred bucks in the big scheme of things! LOL
__________________
The mark of a man is not found in his past,
but how he overcomes adversity and builds his future.
Quitting is not an option.
Regardless of the overwhelming odds or obstacles in your path,
you always have an opportunity to overcome.
It is your attitude that will determine the outcome.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-06-2016, 11:55 AM
huntsfurfish huntsfurfish is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RavYak View Post
I was interested to learn more about these after seeing them in the fishin hole. They have the Marcum LX-I's and the Hawkeyes.

The LX-i's are twice the price but are more powerful(rated to 300 feet vs 200 feet for the Hawkeye) and they use a narrower beam(12 deg vs 25 deg) which means they will be more accurate on steep drop offs etc(wider beam hits more ground and will return the highest point it hits). The LX-i also comes with a case and its display is on the top which I would think would be nicer to use.

Like most things you get what you pay for, from the sounds of it the Hawkeye is good enough for the average fisherman but if you want the best or if you fish deep waters a lot for say lakers then the LX-i would be the way to go.
Agree
Get the Marcum LXi

I had 2 of the hawkeyes and neither worked well if at all. Last one was nothing more than a paper weight. Even had trouble reading in drilled hole.
Some happy users on here. Maybe I had the only bad 2.lol
__________________
.
eat a snickers


made in Alberta__ born n raised.


FS-Tinfool hats by the roll.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.