Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-10-2015, 08:29 AM
cube cube is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Yaker View Post
And I get a kick out of the it's been confirmed by a biologist comment..
Really because those who manage our fisheries have done such a great job and neeeever make mistakes right.LMFAO.
Please note: Biologists do not manage your fisheries, Politian's do.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-10-2015, 11:02 AM
Jamie Black R/T's Avatar
Jamie Black R/T Jamie Black R/T is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Yaker View Post
Good call Young Gun. I love the fear mongering.
Theres people who know what they are talking about, and there are people who think they know everything.

you decide what side of the fence you want to be on my friend.

Have fun fishing la nonne this spring. Let us know how it goes for you.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-10-2015, 11:30 AM
Jamie Black R/T's Avatar
Jamie Black R/T Jamie Black R/T is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cube View Post
Please note: Biologists do not manage your fisheries, Politian's do.
x2

the bios have known the solution to the algae bloom issues with our lakes for decades. People who are happy to catch a few fish in a day and people who dont want to have their septic systems pumped nor move their cattle operations elsewhere are the wall that solution faces. Its going to cost money and step on toes to fix these issues. The voting public is going to have to support some changes or it will just stay business as usual.

Maybe losing a big "healthy" lake like LLN will open some eyes.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-10-2015, 12:03 PM
cube cube is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie Black R/T View Post
x2

the bios have known the solution to the algae bloom issues with our lakes for decades. People who are happy to catch a few fish in a day and people who dont want to have their septic systems pumped nor move their cattle operations elsewhere are the wall that solution faces. Its going to cost money and step on toes to fix these issues. The voting public is going to have to support some changes or it will just stay business as usual.
Yep
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-10-2015, 12:46 PM
Talking moose's Avatar
Talking moose Talking moose is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: McBride/Prince George
Posts: 14,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie Black R/T View Post
x2

the bios have known the solution to the algae bloom issues with our lakes for decades. People who are happy to catch a few fish in a day and people who dont want to have their septic systems pumped nor move their cattle operations elsewhere are the wall that solution faces. Its going to cost money and step on toes to fix these issues. The voting public is going to have to support some changes or it will just stay business as usual.

Maybe losing a big "healthy" lake like LLN will open some eyes.
Well said sir! Well said.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-10-2015, 03:09 PM
North66 North66 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 15
Default

Relevant video from the Edmonton Journal on land use and water quality on Lake Isle, similar geography and land-use as Lac la Nonne:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PD8FnEmi-l0
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-11-2015, 09:44 AM
searay's Avatar
searay searay is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie Black R/T View Post
x2

the bios have known the solution to the algae bloom issues with our lakes for decades. People who are happy to catch a few fish in a day and people who dont want to have their septic systems pumped nor move their cattle operations elsewhere are the wall that solution faces. Its going to cost money and step on toes to fix these issues. The voting public is going to have to support some changes or it will just stay business as usual.

Maybe losing a big "healthy" lake like LLN will open some eyes.
Hi Jamie, I sent you a PM looking for contact information @ SRD.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-11-2015, 10:53 AM
Jamie Black R/T's Avatar
Jamie Black R/T Jamie Black R/T is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by searay View Post
Hi Jamie, I sent you a PM looking for contact information @ SRD.

Thanks
I was asked to hold off until a final round of testing is done coming right up.

After i receive word ill post responses and contact info in this thread with permission.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-11-2015, 11:14 AM
searay's Avatar
searay searay is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie Black R/T View Post
I was asked to hold off until a final round of testing is done coming right up.

After i receive word ill post responses and contact info in this thread with permission.
great thanks !
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-11-2015, 12:03 PM
embury93's Avatar
embury93 embury93 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Barrhead, AB
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie Black R/T View Post
x2

the bios have known the solution to the algae bloom issues with our lakes for decades. People who are happy to catch a few fish in a day and people who dont want to have their septic systems pumped nor move their cattle operations elsewhere are the wall that solution faces. Its going to cost money and step on toes to fix these issues. The voting public is going to have to support some changes or it will just stay business as usual.

Maybe losing a big "healthy" lake like LLN will open some eyes.
I'll just stop commenting now... If anything probably benefiting me for the doubt all of this rambling. You continue to brainwash the public with what you "believe" too be true, and that equals less bafoons turning out to fish on la nonne and results in more fish for me. So no one trust me, everyone Mr. Biologist is right(Wouldn't be the first time ESRD was wrong, probably wont be the last.)

Last edited by embury93; 03-11-2015 at 12:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-11-2015, 12:15 PM
Jamie Black R/T's Avatar
Jamie Black R/T Jamie Black R/T is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlbertaYoungGun_93 View Post
I'll just stop commenting now... If anything probably benefiting me for the doubt all of this rambling. You continue to brainwash the public with what you "believe" too be true, and that equals less bafoons turning out to fish on la nonne and results in more fish for me. So no one trust me, everyone Mr. Biologist is right(Wouldn't be the first time ERSD was wrong, probably wont be the last.)
Thats a great attitude. Head in the sand displayed by text ^^


After all of this...i honestly hope Im wrong...the reports are wrong and the lake is doing just fine...but i wont blindly ignore scientific fact because i can go out and catch 3 fish. If you choose that road i take no issue with it. But to accuse me of "brainwashing" is quite the stretch. Anecdotal evidence or actual low o2 counts and the bottom littered with dead fish...you choose whats real and what is "belief".

Tight lines AlbertaYoungGun_93. i hope you smoke a bunch of fish out there after ice out. Also hope you will update us and post pics so i can eat my words. I would love to admit i was wrong on this.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-12-2015, 02:36 AM
curtis_rak's Avatar
curtis_rak curtis_rak is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West of Edmonton
Posts: 619
Default

If any of you use iFish Alberta you will see that many people are seeing dead fish all over the bottom of the lake....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.