Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-11-2014, 09:41 AM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default This judge's decision won't help fracking

This oil consultant sued for problems on her land after Encana ran some fracking operations.

The judge ruled that both the province and Encana are not exempt from prosecution or being sued.

http://m.thetyee.ca/News/2014/11/11/...acking-Update/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-11-2014, 10:16 AM
bigjohncdn bigjohncdn is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: S.W. Alberta, in the country :-)
Posts: 631
Default

There is no legitimate reason the government or any company should be immune to legal action. You and I are not. They already have a huge advantage in any action that occurs, deep pockets.
__________________
Golden years my a**, more like rusty years
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-11-2014, 10:32 AM
Sundancefisher's Avatar
Sundancefisher Sundancefisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary Perchdance
Posts: 18,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avb3 View Post
This oil consultant sued for problems on her land after Encana ran some fracking operations.

The judge ruled that both the province and Encana are not exempt from prosecution or being sued.

http://m.thetyee.ca/News/2014/11/11/...acking-Update/
So was there tracking fluid in her well or just methane?
__________________
It is not the most intellectual of the species that survives; it is not the strongest that survives; but the species that survives is the one that is able best to adapt and adjust to the changing environment in which it finds itself. Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-11-2014, 11:48 AM
avb3 avb3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 7,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundancefisher View Post
So was there tracking fluid in her well or just methane?
She filed 2000 pages of findings. I assume those are available after the case is heard... when, who knows.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-11-2014, 01:03 PM
rugatika rugatika is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 17,790
Default

http://energyblog.nationalgeographic...om-study-says/



The study, which was released jointly by the American Geophysical Union and NASA, found that between 2003 and 2009, the area released .59 million metric tons of methane each year, which is more than triple the standard estimate for an area of that size. The 2,500-square-mile (6,500 square kilometers) spot lies near the intersection of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Utah.

The hot spot emerged before the rise of hydraulic fracturing, a practice that has spurred concerns about “fugitive” methane emissions—leaks that occur while fracking is under way. Instead, researchers say, the gas is likely coming from leaks during the production of natural gas from coal beds in New Mexico’s San Juan Basin. Coalbed methane accounted for about 8 percent of U.S. natural gas production in 2012, according to the study release.



http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/op...anted=all&_r=0

The Pennsylvania experience with water contamination is also instructive. In Pennsylvania, shale gas is accessed at depths of thousands of feet while drinking water is extracted from depths of only hundreds of feet. Nowhere in the state have fracking compounds injected at depth been shown to contaminate drinking water.

In one study of 200 private water wells in the fracking regions of Pennsylvania, water quality was the same before and soon after drilling in all wells except one. The only surprise from that study was that many of the wells failed drinking water regulations before drilling started. But trucking and storage accidents have spilled fracking fluids and brines, leading to contamination of water and soils that had to be cleaned up. The fact that gas companies do not always disclose the composition of all fracking and drilling compounds makes it difficult to monitor for injected chemicals in streams and groundwater.



The Tyee is a terrible rag. Nikiforuk is clearly trying to link non-fracking related events in these regions (Penn and Colorado) to fracking. Not true.


Good luck to Ernst. Going to need it. (incidentally, I agree with the Judge, IF damages can be proven then liability needs to be assessed)

Wiebo Ludwig could ramble on for hours as well about how this was from drilling and that was from flaring etc etc etc.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.