Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-09-2012, 10:50 PM
mhd's Avatar
mhd mhd is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Alberta
Posts: 344
Question What is the best range finder?

What is the best range finder for under $300? Is it worth getting the angle compensation thing? I need it to be able to range a coyote at 500 yds, or am I just dreaming of finding one in that price range. Not sure if I want to spend $150 on say a redfield or $280 on a Nikon/Leupold. As with everything, I have heard some good and some bad about Bushnell but mostly bad and I was surprised to see that on the bass pro web site ( I was looking at the Bushnell scout 1000 ARC) and under the description it said the range was 1000 yds but only 300 for game,so why do they say that the range is 1000 yds if it will only range 300 yds on game? I am not buying a range finder to range a shiny tin barn so why not put on it how far it can range game?

Anyways any thoughts/recommendations?

I would be using it for archery and rifle hunting.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-09-2012, 10:54 PM
NIKON's Avatar
NIKON NIKON is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern, Alberta
Posts: 887
Default Try this

Try this link , some good info or try a range finder search

http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showt...=range+finders
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-09-2012, 10:54 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bushnell is one of the few that's honest about their range finders. Count on less than 50%, considerably less in most cases, ranging ability on animals vs rated yardage on all stand alone rangefinders.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-09-2012, 10:55 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,265
Default

If you want to be able to consistently range a coyote at 500 yards under most conditions, with a rangefinder that retails for $300, yes, you are dreaming.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-09-2012, 11:07 PM
mhd's Avatar
mhd mhd is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Alberta
Posts: 344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NIKON View Post
Try this link , some good info or try a range finder search

http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showt...=range+finders
Thanks for the link. I have searched most of the range finders just not sure which one would be better.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-09-2012, 11:21 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhd View Post
Thanks for the link. I have searched most of the range finders just not sure which one would be better.
The Bushnell typically comes out pretty well when compared to similar priced range finders.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-10-2012, 12:51 AM
mhd's Avatar
mhd mhd is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Alberta
Posts: 344
Default

Would like to hear some feed back from guys who have used a $300 one.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-10-2012, 02:31 AM
dfrobert dfrobert is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 828
Default

Don't want to hijack this thread entirely.....but does anyone have any input on the Nikon Riflehunter 1000 and the 550 model?? Looking for input towards rifle and bow hunting...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-10-2012, 03:28 AM
Coiloil37's Avatar
Coiloil37 Coiloil37 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oz
Posts: 2,130
Default

I've been using a leica lrf 800 for several years now, it'll range a yote at 500. I picked it up used for less then $300 and it's a world ahead of the bushnell's I used before.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-10-2012, 06:04 AM
pikeslayer22 pikeslayer22 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,716
Default

I have a bushnell and would not recommend one!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-10-2012, 06:48 AM
The Bit Runner. The Bit Runner. is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: lacombe area
Posts: 1,881
Default

I have had a bushnell and would not recommend one either. I have a leica 1200, i bought it off a fella on here, best 500.00$ i ever spent. If you could find a used leica they are far and beyond the best one out there IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-10-2012, 06:50 AM
mad mountain mike's Avatar
mad mountain mike mad mountain mike is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The banks of the Red Deer River
Posts: 737
Default

To buy a quality range finder in the $300 range I would suggest going used. Guys are always upgrading, keep an eye out on the optics trader on here and you are bound to find a good deal on a quality range finder in your price range.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-10-2012, 07:18 AM
Scottmisfits Scottmisfits is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,109
Default

http://www.leupold.com/hunting-shoot...-rangefinders/

I have this one, the RX1000i. I have the one without the TBR, but I'm bowhunting. With TBR it's another $100. This is a great piece of equipment. You can find these ones used as well periodically. They almost replaced the binoculars I had this year. Not for next year though.....��
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-10-2012, 07:22 AM
JohnB JohnB is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North
Posts: 2,185
Default

Had a Bushnell; sold it and got a Leica.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-10-2012, 07:28 AM
elkoholik elkoholik is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 339
Default Look at the Vortex have been impressed.

I just bought a new Vortex Scout this year as I lost my Leupold RX1000 TBR. I have so far been impressed and actually prefer the optics over the leupold. Both have good range deer for me so far have been 650yrd +/- have not seen a dog out past 300yrds so not sure. Like the Vortex housing and they have the unconditional warranty with their rangefinder. Cost was 400 or there a bouts.

Cheers, Dave.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-10-2012, 08:32 AM
densa44 densa44 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North of Cochrane
Posts: 6,695
Unhappy Thanks for the advice

I'm in the same boat with the member who started the post. How long do expect the Leica to last? I bought a cheapie range finder and I eventually threw it away. I wish I'd had this advice before I bought it.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-10-2012, 09:31 AM
CNP's Avatar
CNP CNP is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: WMU 303
Posts: 8,506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhd View Post
What is the best range finder for under $300? Is it worth getting the angle compensation thing? I need it to be able to range a coyote at 500 yds, or am I just dreaming of finding one in that price range. Not sure if I want to spend $150 on say a redfield or $280 on a Nikon/Leupold. As with everything, I have heard some good and some bad about Bushnell but mostly bad and I was surprised to see that on the bass pro web site ( I was looking at the Bushnell scout 1000 ARC) and under the description it said the range was 1000 yds but only 300 for game,so why do they say that the range is 1000 yds if it will only range 300 yds on game? I am not buying a range finder to range a shiny tin barn so why not put on it how far it can range game?

Anyways any thoughts/recommendations?

I would be using it for archery and rifle hunting.
ARC is not important for bow hunting IMO. Hunting in a 20 ft tree stand with your target being 30 yards away.....the difference between true distance vs the angle compensation is virtually nothing. I would not think ARC is important for ranging coyotes either. Coyote hunting on flat land right? Rifle hunting in the mountains, foothills, coulees ARC can be an extremely useful tool at long ranges. Not in your $ range but there are a couple of binos with an incorporated RF. Bushnell Fusion 1600 (with ARC) 10 X 42 for $850 ish. Seen them selling used on this sight for $650. I have a pair, used them on sheep hunting and love them. One tool for glassing and RF. I have ranged over 1600 yards, not on an animal of course.....how could you possibly hold on an animal at 1600 yards freehand. Leica Geovid......way outside your $ range (no ARC). I replaced a Nikon 550 Riflehunter RF and Nikon Monarch ATB 10 X 42 binos with the Bushnell Fusions. I do not regret it.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-10-2012, 09:45 AM
hunter11 hunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 33
Default

just bought a bushnell legend 1200 with arc from ws for 339 and did not use it hunting yet but i took it out and tryed it while walking my dog in the park and i was very happy with it so far i range buildings at 900 and people at 350 i even ranged some geese at 267. i would have bought the laica but its double the money.p.s. at wholesale sport you have 30 days to return it if you dont like it.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-10-2012, 09:49 AM
mhd's Avatar
mhd mhd is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Alberta
Posts: 344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pikeslayer22 View Post
I have a bushnell and would not recommend one!
Which one?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-10-2012, 09:55 AM
pikeslayer22 pikeslayer22 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,716
Default

Chuck Adams Arc
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-10-2012, 09:59 AM
HunterDave HunterDave is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Copperhead Road, Morinville
Posts: 19,290
Default

Read the fine print! I had a look at a Bushnell 850 that was on sale at Can Tire during hunting season. It was only capable of ranging a deer out to 200 yds.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-10-2012, 10:06 AM
mhd's Avatar
mhd mhd is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Alberta
Posts: 344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pikeslayer22 View Post
Chuck Adams Arc
Thanks I was looking at that one to,guess I will keep looking.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-10-2012, 10:16 AM
pikeslayer22 pikeslayer22 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,716
Default

Good for bowhunting, probably was my mistake when purchasing it. Anything under 100 yards in good light its fine, bad light or any other obstacle no good. Same as Hunter Dave stated for this one but worse.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-10-2012, 11:17 AM
NIKON's Avatar
NIKON NIKON is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern, Alberta
Posts: 887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hunter11 View Post
just bought a bushnell legend 1200 with arc from ws for 339 and did not use it hunting yet but i took it out and tryed it while walking my dog in the park and i was very happy with it so far i range buildings at 900 and people at 350 i even ranged some geese at 267. i would have bought the laica but its double the money.p.s. at wholesale sport you have 30 days to return it if you dont like it.
X2

I have one , used it in deer season...... lots of ranges past 500yds side hills bush lines ,........ i find ranging animals past 400 yds tough to hold on them... maybe i'm just alot shakier then i was....lol ... i found range a rock or hillside near your intended target works well for me
Very happy with it for the price

Nikon
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-10-2012, 03:58 PM
.300ultramag .300ultramag is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Southeastern BC
Posts: 222
Default

Had a leupold rx4 from a few years ago, lost it out in the middle of no where, looked for it for a couple hours, couldn't find it. Splurged and bought the Leica crf1600, best money spent on hunting gear in a long time, was consistently ranging out to 1400, hand held, it would of been crazy to strap it to a tripod and really see how far it would go.

I lost it out elk hunting, about 15 km from the nearest road, I can draw a map if anyone wants to go look for it, me and my partner couldn't find it after 7 hours of searching.

Bought a Bushnell ARC 100 for like 340 bucks, and I really wish I would of spent that money on another Leica, like honestly, I have never seen something that is just over double the price perform a thousand times better.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-10-2012, 04:03 PM
top predator top predator is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: red deer, ab
Posts: 591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by .300ultramag View Post
Had a leupold rx4 from a few years ago, lost it out in the middle of no where, looked for it for a couple hours, couldn't find it. Splurged and bought the Leica crf1600, best money spent on hunting gear in a long time, was consistently ranging out to 1400, hand held, it would of been crazy to strap it to a tripod and really see how far it would go.

I lost it out elk hunting, about 15 km from the nearest road, I can draw a map if anyone wants to go look for it, me and my partner couldn't find it after 7 hours of searching.

Bought a Bushnell ARC 100 for like 340 bucks, and I really wish I would of spent that money on another Leica, like honestly, I have never seen something that is just over double the price perform a thousand times better.
Couldnt agree more. Have the Leica
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-10-2012, 04:24 PM
dieselboy20 dieselboy20 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 95
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dfrobert View Post
Don't want to hijack this thread entirely.....but does anyone have any input on the Nikon Riflehunter 1000 and the 550 model?? Looking for input towards rifle and bow hunting...
I have a Nikon Riflehunter 1000 and it works well. Have compared a ton of yardages with my brother in laws Leupold and they all come out the same. The Optics in the Nikon are better IMO than the Leupold. Only thing I hate about it is at last light it changes the reticle to a red colour to make it easier to see it but the whole view changes to a red color and you can barely see out of the damn thing period. But it has to be quite a bit into last light for that to happen. Happened to me ranging a coyote this last summer.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-10-2012, 04:26 PM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,784
Default

^^^^^^^^

You bring up an excellent point....get a range finder that does not have a black LED display.....in low light it will drive you crazy.

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-10-2012, 05:01 PM
wwbirds's Avatar
wwbirds wwbirds is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: near Calgary
Posts: 6,651
Default Only way to go

have the leica Geovids with rangefinder and have had the Leica 1200 for many years. Couldnt be happier.
__________________
a hunting we will go!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-10-2012, 05:12 PM
Gbuss Gbuss is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 767
Default

I have the Nikon. It is good and fairly accurate. Water proof and vary clear. Was able to range a family of yotes at 450 yrds this summer. To bad I was bow hunting.

Gordon.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.