Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-26-2018, 10:15 PM
Kurt505 Kurt505 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
Default 2006 Denali gas mileage

I'm thinking of buying a 2006 Denali for my son and I was wondering if someone with a 2006 (or probably any 2004-2007) Denali pickup could tell me how they are on fuel? I have a 2013 chevy 2500hd with the 6L engine and it's a lot harder on fuel than my 2008 1500 with the 5.3. I'm not sure if it's just the engine or because it's a 3/4 ton.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-26-2018, 10:41 PM
jpohlic jpohlic is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,190
Default

It's probably the engine. I have a 2012 GMC 3500 with the 6.0 and it burns 17-18l/100km empty and 28l/100 km with a 3500 lb camper
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-26-2018, 11:01 PM
Sooner Sooner is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 9,670
Default

Everyone I know who has a 6.0L says the same thing, loves it's fuel. Everyone I know who had the 5.3 said they loved the fuel economy it got. One owner drove a Suburban with the 5.3L and loved it do I doubt 3/4 ton means much.

Can you get a Denali with the 5.3?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-26-2018, 11:53 PM
Kurt505 Kurt505 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sooner View Post
Everyone I know who has a 6.0L says the same thing, loves it's fuel. Everyone I know who had the 5.3 said they loved the fuel economy it got. One owner drove a Suburban with the 5.3L and loved it do I doubt 3/4 ton means much.

Can you get a Denali with the 5.3?
I have a Tahoe with the 5.3 and it gets excellent mileage for a full size SUV. I'm not sure about the 5.3 Denali, the one I'm looking at has a 6L.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-27-2018, 06:41 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,112
Default

The Denali uses all wheel drive, which uses more fuel than the standard system which can be driven in two wheel drive.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-27-2018, 07:13 AM
Penner's Avatar
Penner Penner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,107
Default

If it is the 6.0L (fairly certain it is) fuel economy won't be stellar. All wheel drive and wider tires don't help compared to a SL, SLE, or SLT. From 2014 onward you could get a Denali with either the 5.3L or 6.2L. Incidentally the 6.2L is far superior than the old 6.0L and is very good on fuel although I believe it is recommended to run on 91 octane.

For comparison my 09 with a 5.3L averaged around 13.5L/100km. My 17 with the 5.3L is averaging around 11.0L/100km.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-27-2018, 09:02 AM
jstubbs jstubbs is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Parkland County
Posts: 2,380
Default

One of my first vehicles I owned was an 05 Sierra Denali. I got 19L/100km on the dot in that thing on average city driving as a young kid with a nice truck (and when it came to the dead of winter and tons of snow, I was getting as bad as 21L/100km). Highway cruising in the summer I got closer to 15L/100km, which isn’t bad considering those trucks came standard with fulltime AWD and 4.10 gearing. That 6.0L LQ9 engine made the truck fairly fast for what it was, too.

I miss that truck a lot lately. Never gave me any problems beside an O2 sensor.
__________________
And unlike the clock on the wall at your momma house, I do not have time to hang.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-27-2018, 08:57 PM
Sportsman Sportsman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 338
Default Denali

Our 2007 had the 6.2L engine and it was awesome on fuel. We traded it in on a 2017 Tahoe last year and it’s a gutless gas eating piece of crap.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-27-2018, 09:38 PM
Kurt505 Kurt505 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
Default

Well I bought the Denali, I figure it'll get about 525km to a tank which is almost what my Chevy LTZ with the 5.3 gets but I've got a lift and bigger tires on that one. I got one happy boy too! Lol.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-27-2018, 09:49 PM
Blastoff Blastoff is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Canterbury
Posts: 1,316
Default

6 litre is a pig on fuel, I have one, not my every day driver, I had a 5.3 engine.
I suspect he better get second job to pay the fuel. The 6.2 is a good fuel miler, but you can't get it in a 2500.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-27-2018, 09:59 PM
Kurt505 Kurt505 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blastoff View Post
6 litre is a pig on fuel, I have one, not my every day driver, I had a 5.3 engine.
I suspect he better get second job to pay the fuel. The 6.2 is a good fuel miler, but you can't get it in a 2500.
I get the same mileage out of a tank of fuel on my 5.3 1500 as my 6.0 2500, but the 2500 has about another 40L fuel capacity over the 5.3
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-28-2018, 12:50 AM
jstubbs jstubbs is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Parkland County
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurt505 View Post
Well I bought the Denali, I figure it'll get about 525km to a tank which is almost what my Chevy LTZ with the 5.3 gets but I've got a lift and bigger tires on that one. I got one happy boy too! Lol.
Nice! That’ll be a good truck for him!
__________________
And unlike the clock on the wall at your momma house, I do not have time to hang.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-28-2018, 04:16 PM
Suzukisam Suzukisam is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 564
Default

You can’t put a price on happiness.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-28-2018, 05:12 PM
mooseknuckle's Avatar
mooseknuckle mooseknuckle is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,119
Default

I was not spending enough on fuel with the 5.3 suburban. Only proper thing to do is to drop in a supercharged 6.0. that will fix the problem. Not to mention makes one hell of a grocery getting sleeper!!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-28-2018, 06:34 PM
Kurt505 Kurt505 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
Default

The way I see it, if it likes to burn the fuel maybe he won't be going anywhere he doesn't have to go
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-28-2018, 07:52 PM
tool tool is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,234
Default

As the saying goes, if you have to ask, you likely can't afford it.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.