[QUOTE=sns2;2919929]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redfrog
Here you go again. We all know you are an outfitter. The difference between my organization and yours is that not a single person who has been convicted of any type of inappropriate behaviour, either sexually or physically, toward a student is teaching in this province. Not one.
However, public perception is that your organization seemingly coddles members who are convicted with wildlife offences. They pay their fine assessed by the gov't and carry on, often to repeat the same offence.
APOS needs more than a re-assessment. Correct me if I am wrong.
|
Glad to. You're wrong.
I'm an outfitter. That's the only thing in your post that is 100% correct.
As so often happens with those who can't, you have twisted innuendo with B/S.
I never mentioned sexual or physical or inappropriate behaviour toward students. That is your bailiwick. Outfitters have never been charged or investigated for any of those offences against children. Not one.
Now if no teacher or education administrator has never been investigated, charged or convicted of these offences, how would they be painted as pedophiles. That's the perception.
Now I simply said that from time to time any organization should be scrutinized, audited etc. Now I'm fine with it if you think every other organization except the ones you belong to should be looked at. I understand why you would want to take that position.
I suggested APOS needs a review. But we don't usually hang folks in Canada until the facts have been presented. You understand that right? Like no teacher has been CONVICTED of molesting kids.
I also said from the get go that the penalties should be much more severe than they are now.
So don't come at me like I'm condoning illegal activity by guides or outfitters, and don't insult me with your condescending faux outrage.