Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-24-2017, 04:52 AM
reelhooker reelhooker is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: i have a home in calgary however i live as much of my life as possible in the woods
Posts: 968
Default

Our company bought the 2016 canyon that was featured at the car show last year. Its been in the shop once a month and overall more than the 2010 Tundra sitting in my driveway. Both Hummers are in the shop constantly for repairs that should not be required on a 100K km vehicle.... Just picked up a newer model pathfinder to drive around town. Go Toyota or Nissan and only the gas pumps will hurt you.
__________________
I was once told to beware the Head of the Dragon. I asked why, as I have already married the Tail!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-24-2017, 06:22 AM
Fisherdan Fisherdan is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 346
Default

Tacoma. A V6 model will depreciate 4k the first year, and 3k/yr for several years after that.
I have an 07 that I'm happy with.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-24-2017, 06:57 AM
Screamrider Screamrider is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 43
Default

Had nothing but great experience with the Tacoma. 92 pick up, 00 Taco and 05 Taco. All fetched great resale prices and had issues. Only switched to a F150 due to growing family.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-24-2017, 07:01 AM
sekhon007 sekhon007 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 16
Default Tacoma

From personal experience toyota tacoma all the way in the mid size pickup most reliable and tuffest truck.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-24-2017, 07:07 AM
El-Brento El-Brento is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 307
Default

I have a 2010 manual transmission that I bought new, it now has ~248k on it. It's never let me down, besides regular maintenance the only repairs were ball joints and a u-joint this past year. I don't think mileage is too bad, comparable to my old Nissan Altima.
I test-drive a Dakota at the time and there was no comparison.
Have you given them a test-drive yet?
__________________
Guns don't kill people, physics kills people!
-Dr Dick Solomon
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-24-2017, 07:10 AM
billybob_1967 billybob_1967 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cochrane,AB
Posts: 3
Default

We had a 2005 Chevy Trailblazer that was a horrible combination of tin cans and plastic. We traded it off for a 2012 Tacoma TRD. The difference is night and day. After 5 years and 128,000 KM it was still solid, no squeaks or rattles, everything still worked as it did when we picked it up. We had no issues with it at all, just regular maintenance. The lease just came due on it and we returned it to the dealer and leased a new 4Runner.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-24-2017, 08:06 AM
srs123 srs123 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 455
Default

Am definitely sold on the tacoma, anyone got a good deal in calgary or got some dealer info?.. thanks
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-24-2017, 08:24 AM
tacomama's Avatar
tacomama tacomama is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 605
Default

This should not even be a question. TACOMA. Done.
I have a 2013, awesome truck, reliable, does everything I ever asked of it and more. You will not be dissapointed.
I dealt with Stampede toyota on my last 2 vehicles, the other was an FJ, I miss that thing....
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-24-2017, 08:42 AM
creeky creeky is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by srs123 View Post
Am definitely sold on the tacoma, anyone got a good deal in calgary or got some dealer info?.. thanks
find out the "mean" price for your build. you should be able to have them come down 12-15 points. be prepared to walk away. talk only "all in" pricing.


I got my Taco from Southpoint, at the last sec they tried hard to charge me an admin fee (was prepared to drive down to High River Toyota). they dropped that when I insisted they had 20 mins to firm up our agreed price.


I found Charlesglen and Cochrane Toyota the most expensive on a 2014, picked up a 2015 for 5k less.
__________________
#WISHING YOU A HAPPY WHATEVER DOESN'T OFFEND YOU


#I Am An Outdoorsman And I Approve This Message


#creativity can't wait for technology
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-24-2017, 09:03 AM
blackonblackfx4 blackonblackfx4 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 513
Default

I traded my 2012 Tacoma with a 4L for the 2016 with the 3.5 and 6speed.

I found the older 4L had more tourque at lower rpm but the 3.5 is very powerful though, it just revs a bit higher. It does get a few more mpg, typically get 10.5-12L/100 on the highway. So pretty decent, considering its powerful and very capable.

The Tacoma holds its value so much better, just look them up used on Kijiji. I traded my 4 year old Tacoma for 28,000, what does a 4 year old chev sell for?

Be cautioned, you may get frustrated with the shifting from 6/5/4, but the transmission does take time to learn your driving habits. It'll still shift 6/5/4 but not as bad.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-24-2017, 09:05 AM
blackonblackfx4 blackonblackfx4 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 513
Default

Also peel off the 265/65/17's and go straight to 265/70/17. They fit like a glove and are 1" taller. It's a super common size, tons of selection and decent price.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-24-2017, 09:14 AM
st99 st99 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,573
Default

If you're a hunter and have quad, the tacoma is not an option, it only has a payload of 1000 lbs. Average person 200 lbs. each, average quad 700 lbs, you go hunting with your buddy and you're already over the max. payload. I guess it would be ok if you guys kill a squirrel, but definitely not a moose.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-24-2017, 09:18 AM
bobtodrick bobtodrick is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billybob_1967 View Post
We had a 2005 Chevy Trailblazer that was a horrible combination of tin cans and plastic. We traded it off for a 2012 Tacoma TRD. The difference is night and day. After 5 years and 128,000 KM it was still solid, no squeaks or rattles, everything still worked as it did when we picked it up. We had no issues with it at all, just regular maintenance. The lease just came due on it and we returned it to the dealer and leased a new 4Runner.
And that shows what a crapshoot it is.
I have a 2007 Trailblazer with 295000 km on the clock.
Other that tires, brakes and the serpentine belt I've done nothing but oil changes since I've had it.
Easily on par with the Toyota Previa I had before that...which I got rid of when it had 450000 km.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-24-2017, 09:25 AM
Big Sky's Avatar
Big Sky Big Sky is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by creeky View Post
I got my Taco from Southpoint, at the last sec they tried hard to charge me an admin fee (was prepared to drive down to High River Toyota). they dropped that when I insisted they had 20 mins to firm up our agreed price.
Typical dealer tactics. Once they know that you want the vehicle, they'll start with the added costs. Generally, people get a better price if the dealer wants to sell the vehicle more that you want to buy it. Always be ready to walk away.


Question about the Taco
We're considering one for our next vehicle. Tacomas have plastic fender flares. I've always thought that flares were breeding grounds for rust. What are AO member's experiences? ..... especially after a decade or so.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-24-2017, 09:38 AM
muirsy muirsy is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 449
Default

Tacoma hands down. Better resale and reliability across the board.

In all my travels, from savannahs in Africa to muddy jungles in the Amazon - I've only ever seen Japanese 4x4's. Tacomas, Hilux, Landcruisers, Pajeros, Patrol's...

There's a good reason for that!

Really like the look of the new Canyons though, and the fuel economy on that diesel engine is the best you can get I think.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 03-24-2017, 10:40 AM
troutbug's Avatar
troutbug troutbug is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Bush
Posts: 2,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by st99 View Post
If you're a hunter and have quad, the tacoma is not an option, it only has a payload of 1000 lbs. Average person 200 lbs. each, average quad 700 lbs, you go hunting with your buddy and you're already over the max. payload. I guess it would be ok if you guys kill a squirrel, but definitely not a moose.
For that reason, and pricing, is why I will be going with a Tundra next year
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-24-2017, 10:42 AM
pikergolf's Avatar
pikergolf pikergolf is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trochu View Post
Well, according to this comparison test made on the same day, by the same driver, with the same testing equipment, the Tacoma has 7 cubic feet less front and rear interior space even though its only .4" shorter, has a smaller bed, has a lesser payload, has less towing capacity, has less hp, has less torque, has a lower redline, is slower to 30, is slower to 60, is slower 5-60, is slower 30-50, is slower 50-70, and put up a worse number on the skidpad. There aren't actually many areas the Tacoma will outperform the Canyon, and as you can see in the link, the comparison wasn't even close.

Link
The entire article is an interesting read. We'll see what the long term reliability on the Canyon is.
__________________
“One of the sad signs of our times is that we have demonized those who produce, subsidized those who refuse to produce, and canonized those who complain.”

Thomas Sowell
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-24-2017, 11:37 AM
GreenCanada's Avatar
GreenCanada GreenCanada is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 165
Default

Nissan Frontier, check it out.

Researched Tacoma's for a long time and couldn't find a reason to buy one over a Frontier. Best purchase I've ever made. Better fuel consumption and horsepower with basically any load, when compared to a Tacoma. Roomier cabin and smoother ride.

Canyon and Colorado? Cheaper finishes and mechanical issues galore. Lots of reviews and consumer issues. They used to be half the price of a Tacoma, so it's scary that you're saying a Canyon is the same price...

If it's between a Tacoma and Canyon, get the Tacoma. If you're looking for the best small pickup, get a Frontier.
__________________
GreenCanada

finally, the earth swung around
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 03-24-2017, 11:43 AM
creeky creeky is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Sky View Post
Typical dealer tactics. Once they know that you want the vehicle, they'll start with the added costs. Generally, people get a better price if the dealer wants to sell the vehicle more that you want to buy it. Always be ready to walk away.


Question about the Taco
We're considering one for our next vehicle. Tacomas have plastic fender flares. I've always thought that flares were breeding grounds for rust. What are AO member's experiences? ..... especially after a decade or so.

on that-make em demo you a bunch of models, costs them money for every kilometre you test drive.
__________________
#WISHING YOU A HAPPY WHATEVER DOESN'T OFFEND YOU


#I Am An Outdoorsman And I Approve This Message


#creativity can't wait for technology
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 03-24-2017, 12:16 PM
markg markg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary Area
Posts: 2,381
Default Huge Toyota Fan Boy

My first Toyota was a used 4 Runner. It had somewere between 400 and 500 thounsand km. The only thing I had to do on that vehicle was replace the timming belt and the they did the water pump at the same time. This was done as maintenence, as it didnt fail. I had a FJ cruiser that had over 200,000 km and never put a wrench to the thing, it was a tank. I currently own a Tundra that I purchased brand new. I havenet even had a warning light fail. Its been flawless for 3 years.

Thats why I am a fan Boy
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 03-24-2017, 03:52 PM
J0HN_R1 J0HN_R1 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trochu View Post
Well, according to this comparison test made on the same day, by the same driver, with the same testing equipment, the Tacoma has 7 cubic feet less front and rear interior space even though its only .4" shorter, has a smaller bed, has a lesser payload, has less towing capacity, has less hp, has less torque, has a lower redline, is slower to 30, is slower to 60, is slower 5-60, is slower 30-50, is slower 50-70, and put up a worse number on the skidpad. There aren't actually many areas the Tacoma will outperform the Canyon, and as you can see in the link, the comparison wasn't even close.

Link
That was a test of the new Tacoma, not the 2004-2015 version with the 4.0L... And again, resale is far better with any Tacoma.

Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 03-24-2017, 04:34 PM
Trochu's Avatar
Trochu Trochu is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J0HN_R1 View Post
That was a test of the new Tacoma, not the 2004-2015 version with the 4.0L... And again, resale is far better with any Tacoma.

So your premise is that I was comparing the Canyon to a 2016 Tacoma, which isn't fair because the old ones are better?

And again, I don't doubt that its better, but I'd love to see some actual depreciation figures from a reputable site. Is it that much better that it covers the approximately $7k difference in MSRP for the Tacoma?
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 03-24-2017, 04:50 PM
Bub Bub is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,392
Default

Can't show you a depreciation schedule from any reputable source, but I can tell you that a 10-year old Tacoma can fetch a price of a new canyon today, or almost that. That's from personal experience. How much do you think a 10-year old canyon would be worth?

If I were to choose, I might consider Nissan, though I am not a fan, but non of the domestic brands would even come to mind to look at, in this class of a vehicle (probably most classes, actually). The only thing that "goes" on the Tacomas and 4runners, as far as I am aware, are cv boots, which sucks. Might need a cv boot every 100,000 km or so. Other than that, there are no complaints.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 03-24-2017, 07:40 PM
sewerrat's Avatar
sewerrat sewerrat is online now
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,629
Default

The Canyon has way better tow rating the 3.6L gas has 7000lb rating and the
2.8L diesel has a 7700 rating.

The Tacoma is rated for 6400 lb.

With the Canyon or Colorado you get way more options than the Tacoma, more bang for your buck.

As for the Nissan frontier that was also mentioned, Those trucks at out of the running they havn't changed in 13 years that model is so out dated, but if you go to South America, Caribbean or Asia they have a way newer model.

and that goes same for the ford ranger.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 03-24-2017, 09:00 PM
bobtodrick bobtodrick is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bub View Post
Can't show you a depreciation schedule from any reputable source, but I can tell you that a 10-year old Tacoma can fetch a price of a new canyon today, or almost that. That's from personal experience. How much do you think a 10-year old canyon would be worth?
Really. There are a number of 2005/06 on Kiijiji (Alberta) right now from $7900 -$9000.
Please point me to where I can get a new Canyon for that...I'll pick up one each for me and my two sons.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 03-24-2017, 10:21 PM
Bub Bub is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,392
Default

Maybe shouldn't said today since I have no idea what the market is like now.
However, my buddy sold one last year, 2005 with low mileage of just over 150,000 km, manual transmission for $17,500. The buyer also paid for the windshield and safety.
My other buddy sold his 2005 two years ago, manual transmission and mileage of just over 170,000 km for $18,500. This one was lifted. The buyer paid for new windshield.
The first one also had a set of winter tires on rims that were passed to the buyer. Both vehicles were in great shape. One buyer also had to replace a cv boot on the driver's side about two months after the purchase. Both buyers are still happy campers.

P.S. Took a quick look at kijiji and have not seen too many below $14,000. So my question remains, how much would a 10-year old canyon would be priced at?
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 03-25-2017, 09:38 AM
Passthru's Avatar
Passthru Passthru is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by st99 View Post
If you're a hunter and have quad, the tacoma is not an option, it only has a payload of 1000 lbs. Average person 200 lbs. each, average quad 700 lbs, you go hunting with your buddy and you're already over the max. payload. I guess it would be ok if you guys kill a squirrel, but definitely not a moose.
Strange. I load a quad in my Tacoma every year and pull a small trailer. With ramps against the cab you can close the tailgate. If payload is an issue for you then air bag it.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 03-25-2017, 09:55 AM
blgoodbrand1's Avatar
blgoodbrand1 blgoodbrand1 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Beaverlodge
Posts: 1,859
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by st99 View Post
If you're a hunter and have quad, the tacoma is not an option, it only has a payload of 1000 lbs. Average person 200 lbs. each, average quad 700 lbs, you go hunting with your buddy and you're already over the max. payload. I guess it would be ok if you guys kill a squirrel, but definitely not a moose.



I would disagree. Kawi 650 and a 53 incher.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 03-25-2017, 09:55 AM
DOGFISH's Avatar
DOGFISH DOGFISH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Fort Saskatchewan
Posts: 733
Default

My opinion is buy neither of them, buy a full size , price of these small cramped trucks is not worth it with the fuel economy on the highway with a full size.My family, (Dad, brothers, son and my self ) have 13 Silverado's with 5.3l and 6.2l between us. Oil changes and tires is all we maintain. Resale is good on them, just remember most vehicles are a necessary liability and all will depreciate no matter the brand. They all wear out and rust, just some worse than others. DogFish
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 03-25-2017, 10:22 AM
elkdump elkdump is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In a tree near ALTA
Posts: 3,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOGFISH View Post
My opinion is buy neither of them, buy a full size , price of these small cramped trucks is not worth it with the fuel economy on the highway with a full size.My family, (Dad, brothers, son and my self ) have 13 Silverado's with 5.3l and 6.2l between us. Oil changes and tires is all we maintain. Resale is good on them, just remember most vehicles are a necessary liability and all will depreciate no matter the brand. They all wear out and rust, just some worse than others. DogFish
X 2 ! , both of the OP,s alternatives are city dweller crapp cans , made for people who wanna " think " they are driving a pickup truck,,
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.