Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old 11-07-2017, 10:49 AM
Blackwolf Blackwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: southern Alberta
Posts: 302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowtown guy View Post
Barnes recommends 2000fps
Nope, just got off the horn Barnes reps say with the 139, it will open completely at 1300 and partially at lower velocities. The higher weights are for losses lead has, but with copper, the LRX retains 100% of the weight. The 139LRX was designed specifically for the 7mm Rem Mag. It has been tested for Deer, Moose, and Elk out to 1,000 yards. Either whether I go with the 7 or 300 rum, the extra barrel length of 27.5" will give me around 250-300 fps greater than the load data at 24".

calculating.... using Nosler load data, and 68 grains of r-22 complete burn @27.5". the velocity will then be 3540+. at 1000 yards it will be 1708 fps, or 400fps more than rated.

what I have learned in this exercise, the old ways of thinking do not apply anymore, with the new weight retention, heavy bullets are not needed, and speed really does kill. We need to re-examine how we reload....

I am leaning heavily toward the 7mm Rem Mag, because I'm used to it and the 300 RUM kick is probably a bit much for this lazy ass.

Last edited by Blackwolf; 11-07-2017 at 10:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.