|
11-07-2012, 12:54 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 112
|
|
Aqua vu VS Vexilar
Debating whether to purchase a Vexilar or Aqua Vu under water camera.Currently own a Aqua view, which I've had for 8 years with no issues. Would like to upgrade to color and bigger screen. Searching the internet, most say Vexilar hands down. Would like to hear what my fellow fishermen think?
|
11-07-2012, 01:41 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 90
|
|
Marcum
|
11-07-2012, 03:03 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 387
|
|
Flasher
|
11-07-2012, 05:00 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 546
|
|
I was all excited about the Aqua-Vu 760cz Camera when it came out, bought the camera as soon as it hit the stores. Turned out that my cheap Chinese knock-off(paid $75) was a better picture and build quality. Ended up buying and returning 3 of them, never did get a good Aqua-Vu so I walked away.
Last edited by mayuan; 11-07-2012 at 05:01 PM.
Reason: grammer
|
11-07-2012, 05:00 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
|
|
Marcum.
|
11-07-2012, 05:58 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 437
|
|
Depends where you are fishing. If your fishing shallow lakes then a camera works great. If your going to fish some deeper water then i definitely recommend a Marcum Flasher.
With a flasher you can fish the entire water column. And its just as exciting as a camera. You can literally watch the fish follow your lure, and slow it down or speed it up trigger a hit. The best thing about a flasher is the instant readings. if your lure is off the bottom and your flasher registers a fish half way up, you can move your lure instantly to the fish.
I have a Marcum LX5 and love it.
|
11-07-2012, 06:27 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St Albert, AB
Posts: 228
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 75ft Arborist
Depends where you are fishing. If your fishing shallow lakes then a camera works great. If your going to fish some deeper water then i definitely recommend a Marcum Flasher.
With a flasher you can fish the entire water column. And its just as exciting as a camera. You can literally watch the fish follow your lure, and slow it down or speed it up trigger a hit. The best thing about a flasher is the instant readings. if your lure is off the bottom and your flasher registers a fish half way up, you can move your lure instantly to the fish.
|
I agree.............except for the Marcum part
I have both an FL-20 Vexilar and an Aqua-Vu camera. I enjoy them both for different reasons.
For me the camera is fun (especially for kids) but you are limited in what you can do with it.
|
11-07-2012, 07:01 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chestermere, AB
Posts: 225
|
|
Cameras are toys, flashers are tools. I wouldn't trade my Marcum for anything.
|
11-07-2012, 07:12 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 46
|
|
Just picked up a marcum 625 cam, got good rev. I also use the humm ice 55 flasher, but marcum has the lx9 which is flasher and cam, very nice!!
|
11-07-2012, 08:28 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 654
|
|
Have both a marcum camera and flaser. Both top of the line for 2010. Would recommend both. But find the camera to be way more useful
|
11-08-2012, 08:37 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 112
|
|
Thanks guys. Now I dont know what to do? Ha! Oh well, ice needs to thicken up a bit more. That will give me time to make a decision.
|
11-08-2012, 01:42 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
|
|
If you have a boat, your fishfinder can do double duty(no need for a flasher). And you had a camera for 8years and were happy using it, so buy buy a new marcum 825(best out there). Flashers are old tech anyway .
|
11-08-2012, 02:08 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 546
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by huntsfurfish
If you have a boat, your fishfinder can do double duty(no need for a flasher). And you had a camera for 8years and were happy using it, so buy buy a new marcum 825(best out there). Flashers are old tech anyway .
|
If you were interested in a flasher or fishfinder.
I would have to agree with going with a fishfinder vs a flasher. I used a cheap huminbird for several years and it was great on the ice, upgraded to a lowrance HDS this year. When I compared the fishfinder to the flashers, I found that with were about the same speed(flasher was a bit faster than the hummingbird 530 about a half second delay). Going to have to test the lowrance against one of the high end flashers.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:42 PM.
|