Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fly-Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-06-2012, 04:26 PM
Got2fish
 
Posts: n/a
Default Trout pic. Bull or Brookie

I'm almost 100% sure this is a fat stream brookie, but I didn't think this stream had brookies. Browns and bulls I thought. This was my first fish from elk creek. Caught late August 2012 on a parasol emerger.

Can anybody confirm there is Brook trout in the creek?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-06-2012, 04:32 PM
BeeGuy BeeGuy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
Default

Bull Trout (S.confluentus)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2012, 04:43 PM
Flyfisher87 Flyfisher87 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,248
Default

Bull trout. No brookies in that creek at all.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-06-2012, 04:49 PM
jrs
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No black put it back, 100% bull trout. Your picture clearly shows the dorsal fin is free of vermiculations.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-06-2012, 04:49 PM
trooper trooper is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyfisher87 View Post
Bull trout. No brookies in that creek at all.
Yep a bull! No black, throw it back!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-06-2012, 05:43 PM
Got2fish
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The stream is catch and release. As most are in the areas I fish.


He had a very square tail, like S. fontinalis. Yes the dorsal fin had no blakc spots like a brookie would have.


Thanks for the confirmation on bull trout, and not brook.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-06-2012, 05:44 PM
Steve fly guy Steve fly guy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 111
Default

MMMmmmmmyup Bully, didn"t even have to look!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-06-2012, 05:50 PM
Got2fish
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve fly guy View Post
MMMmmmmmyup Bully, didn"t even have to look!
I wish I didn't have to look to see things.

Just tried looking without looking. Doesn't work.

But thanks
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-06-2012, 05:54 PM
Got2fish
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bull trout typically have a fork in the tail, right?

Do they interbreed with brook trout?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-06-2012, 06:03 PM
Flyfisher87 Flyfisher87 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,248
Default

They do cross breed with brookies. I just can't think of the name off the top of my head, if there is one.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-06-2012, 06:08 PM
Got2fish
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyfisher87 View Post
They do cross breed with brookies. I just can't think of the name off the top of my head, if there is one.

Thanks


Sorry about all the questions. I'm new to bull trout and cutthroat trout.

Not too many of them back east.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-06-2012, 07:47 PM
kritofr's Avatar
kritofr kritofr is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 405
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Got2fish View Post
Bull trout typically have a fork in the tail, right?

Do they interbreed with brook trout?
Bull trout have a square tail; Lake trout have the deep fork in the tail.

Not sure about the interbreeding with Brookies
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-06-2012, 07:53 PM
Got2fish
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kritofr View Post
Bull trout have a square tail; Lake trout have the deep fork in the tail.

Not sure about the interbreeding with Brookies
So what would you say this is, based on the tail?

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-06-2012, 07:54 PM
Got2fish
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A forked tail bull, thinking he's a laker?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-06-2012, 08:00 PM
flyguyd's Avatar
flyguyd flyguyd is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 3,660
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Got2fish View Post
A forked tail bull, thinking he's a laker?
Na ,looks all bully to me
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-06-2012, 08:01 PM
TheLegend TheLegend is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: FTR Road in the summer (flyfishin), The bush in autum (huntin) the hills in winter (shreddin the pow
Posts: 1,136
Default

looks like a bull
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-06-2012, 08:36 PM
kritofr's Avatar
kritofr kritofr is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 405
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Got2fish View Post
So what would you say this is, based on the tail?

Bull trout
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-06-2012, 08:37 PM
fishpro fishpro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NW Calgary
Posts: 1,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Got2fish View Post
The stream is catch and release. As most are in the areas I fish.


He had a very square tail, like S. fontinalis. Yes the dorsal fin had no blakc spots like a brookie would have.


Thanks for the confirmation on bull trout, and not brook.
Don't worry about everyone saying to put it back, it wasn't them questioning if you did or not. The provincial motto for bull trout it "No black, put it back".
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-06-2012, 08:48 PM
FriendlyGiant's Avatar
FriendlyGiant FriendlyGiant is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 34
Default

Another way to tell is the white leading edge on the lower fins, that combined with the lack of black spots makes for an easy I.D. on bulls.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-06-2012, 09:00 PM
Got2fish
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FriendlyGiant View Post
Another way to tell is the white leading edge on the lower fins, that combined with the lack of black spots makes for an easy I.D. on bulls.
White leading edges....like on a brookie?

Anyways thanks for the clarification on the first bull pic. Second one was from the Cline, and yes I knew that one was a bull. But the square tail on the first pic through me off.

Just to continue on the hybrids. If one were to catch a brookie/bull hybrid.....would it be considered a bull or a brookie when it comes to regs?


Just so people can sleep better tonight. I don't keep any wild fish. Just to odd brookie or bow from the put and take trout ponds. Like others, I do enjoy the odd stocked trout bonking.


Again thanks everybody. These were my first bulls ever. Nothing huge... But that will come.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-06-2012, 10:12 PM
1/2 oz Bucktail's Avatar
1/2 oz Bucktail 1/2 oz Bucktail is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Grande Cache
Posts: 150
Default

Avoid using the tail for identification with the exception of a deeply forked tail. The best indicators are the vermiculations on the dorsal fin and overall head and body morphology. Once you get your hands on more fish you will notice the differences in head shapes and sizes. You will also get to the point where a bull is a bull and you will wonder how bulls and brookies ever get confused because they are such different fish.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-06-2012, 11:56 PM
Jayhad Jayhad is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,050
Default

Has anyone on here caught a brull trout (brookXbull)? I know it's possible, but it has to be pretty rare i would think.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-07-2012, 12:57 AM
FriendlyGiant's Avatar
FriendlyGiant FriendlyGiant is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Got2fish View Post
White leading edges....like on a brookie?
Haha well I think any angler confusing a bull and a brook based on the lower fins alone has got way bigger problems than just fish identification!




I guess what I should have said is the white leading edge allows you to identify a bull over a brown trout, as those two are more likely to be confused than a bull and a brookie.

Some lakers and bulls could be confused as well based on markings. In that case a good indicator would be the deep forked tail on the laker, or as Bucktail mentioned head size and shape.

Last edited by FriendlyGiant; 11-07-2012 at 01:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-07-2012, 08:08 AM
npauls's Avatar
npauls npauls is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta
Posts: 4,062
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FriendlyGiant View Post
Haha well I think any angler confusing a bull and a brook based on the lower fins alone has got way bigger problems than just fish identification!




I guess what I should have said is the white leading edge allows you to identify a bull over a brown trout, as those two are more likely to be confused than a bull and a brookie.

Some lakers and bulls could be confused as well based on markings. In that case a good indicator would be the deep forked tail on the laker, or as Bucktail mentioned head size and shape.
There is a picture on the forum somewhere of a big bully that most anglers would think it was a brookie. It had all the same colorings of a brookie except the black spots. Some of the anglers on the forum did some investigating and research and figured out it was a bull trout in spawning colors.

Best indicator on which species it is would be the "no black, put it back".
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-07-2012, 09:18 AM
Flyrod1970 Flyrod1970 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
There is a picture on the forum somewhere of a big bully that most anglers would think it was a brookie. It had all the same colorings of a brookie except the black spots. Some of the anglers on the forum did some investigating and research and figured out it was a bull trout in spawning colors.
I would be interested in seeing that pic. Of all the different species of fish I've caught, a brookie is probably the easiest to identify.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:48 AM
Heavy K Heavy K is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 267
Default

I've got a brook/bull hybrid before. But only once that I can be certain. The provincial fish biologists recommend NOT keeping hybrids. Apparently the dorsal fin vermiculations which are slightly different on the hybrids (light vermiculations on a dark background vs the dark vermiculations on a light background) are prone to fading once the fish are out of the water. You could potentially find yourself in a lot of trouble if you're stopped by F & W later in the day.

HK
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-07-2012, 11:27 AM
Heavy K Heavy K is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Got2fish View Post
So what would you say this is, based on the tail?

You wouldn't make any conclusion based on it's tail. The fact that there are no black markings on the dorsal fin indicates that it's a Bull trout. There's a reason that tail shape, coloration, and white on the leading edge of fins are not used as distinguishing characteristics for the identification of trout and char. They are not specific to one species, ie white leading edges on fins can be found on Brown Trout, as mentioned above, and a forked tail, as seen in this picture, is present on a Bull.

HK
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-07-2012, 12:27 PM
Got2fish
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So what would you guys call this? No vermiculations, white leading edge....

Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-07-2012, 12:39 PM
Bhflyfisher Bhflyfisher is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Prince George, BC
Posts: 1,190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Got2fish View Post
So what would you guys call this? No vermiculations, white leading edge....

I still see more brookie then bull in that picture. In fact i dont see any bull at all...
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-07-2012, 01:00 PM
1/2 oz Bucktail's Avatar
1/2 oz Bucktail 1/2 oz Bucktail is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Grande Cache
Posts: 150
Default

Yeah, the bottom pic of fish partly in water is a brookie.

You wouldn't belive the number of guys in this area that use poor id skills as a justification for poaching. I have had poachers tell me that a 28" fish on shore was a brook. Really, can they even get that big? Would have to be a pretty fat brookie to hit 28" length.

Go out and catch a pile of the various char species and you will soon understand the differences between, with the exception of possibly dolly/bull and dolly/arctic char.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.