Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-23-2013, 11:20 PM
coyotekiller's Avatar
coyotekiller coyotekiller is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central AB
Posts: 1,705
Default 2013 draw summary online

http://mywildalberta.com/Hunting/Hun...t/Default.aspx
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-23-2013, 11:27 PM
220swifty's Avatar
220swifty 220swifty is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 4,998
Default

Looks like that bull elk in 720 is just going to keep evading me.
__________________
I'm not saying I'm the man, but it's been said.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-23-2013, 11:37 PM
Big Daddy Badger Big Daddy Badger is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,558
Default

Looking at the length of time it takes to get a tag for just about everythung except perhaps antlered MD... its ridiculous.
Especially when one considers how easily a non-resident can get a tag.

Might just have to relocate after retirement.... living outside of Alberta is the best way to guarantee a chance at some species as long as a guys is willing to throw enough coin at it.

Thanks to the OP for posting the link.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-24-2013, 12:51 AM
bighorn1 bighorn1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: RMH
Posts: 662
Default

These stats are not very usefull as they are bogus. i applied for moose in 328 this year for the nov 1-30th season with a priority 7 and was not drawn. According to this there were 100% drawn with a p7 and even a few drawn with a p6 so i wouldnt hold much accountability in these stats, needless to say i will be asking our draw department alot of questions on this.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-24-2013, 03:27 AM
swift1's Avatar
swift1 swift1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 273
Default

I agree Big Daddy....should allow less tags for non-residents for some species.
__________________
1 shot.....1 kill.

Last edited by swift1; 09-24-2013 at 03:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-24-2013, 04:37 AM
Scott N's Avatar
Scott N Scott N is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bighorn1 View Post
These stats are not very usefull as they are bogus. i applied for moose in 328 this year for the nov 1-30th season with a priority 7 and was not drawn. According to this there were 100% drawn with a p7 and even a few drawn with a p6 so i wouldnt hold much accountability in these stats, needless to say i will be asking our draw department alot of questions on this.
I don't see WMU 328 on the list... am I missing something?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-24-2013, 06:01 AM
honda450's Avatar
honda450 honda450 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 6,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott N View Post
I don't see WMU 328 on the list... am I missing something?
Its draw choice 883.
__________________
Smoke or Fire in the Forest Dial 310-FIRE


thegungirl.ca @gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-24-2013, 07:18 AM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,782
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bighorn1 View Post
These stats are not very usefull as they are bogus. i applied for moose in 328 this year for the nov 1-30th season with a priority 7 and was not drawn. According to this there were 100% drawn with a p7 and even a few drawn with a p6 so i wouldnt hold much accountability in these stats, needless to say i will be asking our draw department alot of questions on this.
Did you apply solo? Or did you apply along with someone else who had lower priority?

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-24-2013, 08:18 AM
ULTRAlite's Avatar
ULTRAlite ULTRAlite is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Central AB
Posts: 1,215
Default

Those stats are painful...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-24-2013, 08:22 AM
bighorn1 bighorn1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: RMH
Posts: 662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefty-Canuck View Post
Did you apply solo? Or did you apply along with someone else who had lower priority?

LC
Solo
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-24-2013, 10:07 AM
Couleestalker's Avatar
Couleestalker Couleestalker is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Brooks
Posts: 606
Default

I like what they did with the Trophy Antelope tags in WMU 150, 151, 152.

2012 15 tags
2013 207 tags
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-24-2013, 11:20 AM
HOSS HOSS is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 56
Default

What a complete joke in 150-152!!!! I work in the area and it's hard as hell to find a herd of antelope...Nevermind 207 of them!! How can you go from 15 to 207 with that kind of winter again.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-24-2013, 11:34 AM
Wiz Wiz is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 743
Default

no elk tags for 132?? why not?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-24-2013, 01:34 PM
Mark Mark is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 530
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HOSS View Post
What a complete joke in 150-152!!!! I work in the area and it's hard as hell to find a herd of antelope...Nevermind 207 of them!! How can you go from 15 to 207 with that kind of winter again.
Same for 116,119,124,148. 152 tags is ludicrous. We farm in 148 and use to see them all the time on our land. Now they are as rare as hen's teeth. We see the occassional one, but nothing like we saw four or five years ago.
When you compare the other areas, the tags are all way under 100, even in the areas where they are much more abundant, like 102 and 108. This doesn't make sense. There much be an error, or somebody is smoking something funny......

Does anybody know who the biologist for this area?

Doesn't make sense to me.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-24-2013, 02:16 PM
Mark Mark is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 530
Default

I just did some checking on and in the last 10 years, there never have been that many tags (152) available for 116,124,119, and 148. Somebody must have royally screwed up!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-24-2013, 02:38 PM
Deer Hunter Deer Hunter is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark View Post
I just did some checking on and in the last 10 years, there never have been that many tags (152) available for 116,124,119, and 148. Somebody must have royally screwed up!
It doesnt make alot of sense that a few miles away in Saskatchewan, there has been no season for antelope in the past two years due to population concerns, yet cross the boarder into WMU 148/119 and there are all time record amounts of Alberta tags being given out. Its a farce.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-24-2013, 02:43 PM
walking buffalo's Avatar
walking buffalo walking buffalo is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,230
Default

I'll throw out three possibilities for the number of Pronghorn tags.

1) The animals were there during the surveys but have migrated elsewhere before the hunting season. I have seen this happen in previous years.

2) SRD is over-issuing licences in these zones in an attempt to reduce the number of applicants in the draw knowing that having a high number of hunters results in a greatly reduced success rate.

3) SRD wants to put more resident licences on the books for the sake of optics and the Outfitter Policy ratios, again feeling safe in over-issuing licences due to decreased success rates or knowing that the animals are just not there.


I am continuing to have great concerns and questions about how Pronghorn population surveys and Resident licence issuing are being managed.



An email to F&W head office will answer the question of which biologist is in charge of Pronghorn management.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-24-2013, 02:50 PM
357xp's Avatar
357xp 357xp is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: by the crick
Posts: 801
Default

Interesting to see guys blow a 12 priorty on bull moose where they could get in with a 1 or 2 priorty level.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-24-2013, 03:30 PM
HOSS HOSS is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 56
Default

Your exactly right Deer Hunter!!! Unreal with the number of tags.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-24-2013, 04:12 PM
steeleyes steeleyes is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 80
Default

Nevermind, wrong link.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 09-24-2013, 04:42 PM
whitetail Junkie's Avatar
whitetail Junkie whitetail Junkie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: AB
Posts: 6,638
Default

The few high tag Antelope zones are bad business! .....they got wmu 144 and area right with only a handfull of tags,but the 152 & 200 and some ,tag zones are uncalled for....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-24-2013, 09:04 PM
J-Driver J-Driver is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 88
Default

Nice to see I only have 14 other people running around in my 252 elk tag though! Wishing I wouldn't have 999 my antelope
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-24-2013, 09:05 PM
ishootbambi ishootbambi is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: medicine hat
Posts: 9,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by walking buffalo View Post
I am continuing to have great concerns and questions about how Pronghorn population surveys and Resident licence issuing are being managed.



.
just a few months ago you were crying loudly about too few stinker tags. seems like maybe you just like to complain? let us know when you decide what your stance is. from what I can tell, it looks like you just need to squawk about something just to be heard.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-24-2013, 09:08 PM
leeaspell's Avatar
leeaspell leeaspell is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Whitecourt
Posts: 7,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Daddy Badger View Post
Looking at the length of time it takes to get a tag for just about everythung except perhaps antlered MD... its ridiculous.
Especially when one considers how easily a non-resident can get a tag.

Might just have to relocate after retirement.... living outside of Alberta is the best way to guarantee a chance at some species as long as a guys is willing to throw enough coin at it.

Thanks to the OP for posting the link.
You only got to be P1 for bull moose late season in some zones.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-24-2013, 09:09 PM
J-Driver J-Driver is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 88
Default

What really confuses me is that in 150-152 antelope, 84 percent were drawn on a priority 10, but 100 percent were drawn on a 9? Computer problem again?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-24-2013, 09:29 PM
littlered's Avatar
littlered littlered is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 328
Default

Priority 10's can apply with a 1 and not get drawn.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-24-2013, 10:04 PM
trophyboy trophyboy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 773
Default

Looks like the SRD azz clowns still have no clue about what's going on. the antelope numbers ARE NOT there to justify the amount of tags they are giving out nor are the mule deer numbers. I was hoping things were going to change but it looks like the slaughter is going to continue.

What I want to know is who can I call and tear a strip off of?

And why the hell are we allowing non-residents to hunt antelope and mule deer, especially now? Seriously folks its high time we raised some serious shyte!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-24-2013, 10:13 PM
J-Driver J-Driver is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 88
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by littlered View Post
Priority 10's can apply with a 1 and not get drawn.
I don't follow you on this
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-25-2013, 12:36 AM
st99 st99 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,573
Default

don't worry guys, I've been told they estimate game population with the same computer that analyse global warming
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-25-2013, 04:39 AM
Pikebreath Pikebreath is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Driver View Post
What really confuses me is that in 150-152 antelope, 84 percent were drawn on a priority 10, but 100 percent were drawn on a 9? Computer problem again?
It's two P10s that didn't get drawn,,, more likely an application error or perhaps they applied in a group application with someone who had a lower priority.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.