Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-07-2013, 10:30 PM
Moreland Moreland is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Red Deer County
Posts: 108
Default 270 vs 25-06

I am going to be purchasing a new gun here shortly. Going to go with a Sako 85 Finnlight. I have been mulling around some ideas for what calibre I should get it in. I originally thought about getting it in a 7mm Rem Mag but I already have a 300WSM, so I don't really need a gun that big (plus I have always wanted a Remington 700BDL in 7mm and although you can never have enough guns lol I don't think I'll need two 7s).

What I've got it down to now is a 270Win or a 25-06Rem... I've always wanted a 25-06 and when I was buying my first hunting rifle my first choice was a 270 (ended up getting a great deal on a 30-06, so I went with that). I know I already have enough gun for anything so I just wanted to see what everyone thought about the two calibres I have narrowed it down to. It will mostly be for deer, although it would also be a backup rifle for moose and elk. I'm not huge into long range shooting but I wouldnt mind practicing and being able to takes yotes at long range with it as well. I don't reload as of yet but I will someday, I know 270 ammo is available everywhere so that makes it easier but 25-06 cant be that hard to come by right?

Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-07-2013, 10:33 PM
Prdtrgttr's Avatar
Prdtrgttr Prdtrgttr is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lethbridge
Posts: 749
Default

Go with the 270, especially if you want it for back up for moose and elk.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-07-2013, 10:40 PM
Smokinyotes Smokinyotes is online now
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: onoway, Ab
Posts: 6,993
Default

I was going to recommend the 25-06 until you said you may use it for a back up for moose and elk. I know lots of people have flattened moose and elk with the 25-06 but I believe in bigger bullets for moose and elk. I have shot 3 elk and numerous moose with the 270 and it works well. I know lots will disagree with me but I would go with the 270.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-07-2013, 10:54 PM
lannie lannie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CNP
Posts: 3,760
Default

You have whittled it down to two fine cartridges. With what you have already I would be inclined to go the 25-06 route. No wrong choice there.
__________________
You are what you do, not what you say.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-07-2013, 11:01 PM
bdub's Avatar
bdub bdub is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,713
Default

Ballistically the 25-06 with 115-120s is about the same as the 270 with 130-140s. I would go within the 270 in your situation. It's light for moose and elk type stuff but better than the 25-06 for sure. My coyote/wolf gun is a 270. I don't shoot for fur but it the damage to hides is pretty minimal in most cases. I'm shooting 130 partitions at about 3000 fps.
__________________
There are some who can live without wild things, and some who cannot. Aldo Leopold
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-07-2013, 11:03 PM
addictedfisherman's Avatar
addictedfisherman addictedfisherman is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 271
Default

I would def get the 25-06. After seeing what the 257wby does to deer I'm a firm believer. I have a 30 cal and the 257 for my main hunting cartridges and its a dynamite combination. the 25 cal will work for moose and elk but it is on the light side of things.
__________________
“We are measured more as hunters by the things we choose not to shoot, than by those that we do.”
Keith McCafferty
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-07-2013, 11:05 PM
missingtwo missingtwo is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: south of Edm
Posts: 517
Default

You have a 30 caliber. Your going to get a 284 caliber (7mm). Thats real close to .277. You just as well jump down to .257.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-07-2013, 11:13 PM
bdub's Avatar
bdub bdub is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by missingtwo View Post
You have a 30 caliber. Your going to get a 284 caliber (7mm). Thats real close to .277. You just as well jump down to .257.
I would agree with you if the op was looking for a coyote/deer gun but as a coyote/moose-elk gun I think the 270 would be a better option. Jmo and not trying to ruffle any feathers.
__________________
There are some who can live without wild things, and some who cannot. Aldo Leopold
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-08-2013, 07:24 AM
Fowl91 Fowl91 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Strathmore, AB
Posts: 701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by missingtwo View Post
You have a 30 caliber. Your going to get a 284 caliber (7mm). Thats real close to .277. You just as well jump down to .257.
Yeah I read it as, you have a 300WSM and you've always wanted a 7mm. Based on that I would go down to the 25-06. Great for coyote/deer/elk, and then begin your pursuit for your 7mm Remington.

Also factory ammo isn't hard to come by. I shoot 100gr Federal with Nosler ballistic tips, a bit more expensive than .270 factory ammo. However for elk or moose I would go with a 120gr bullet.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2013, 07:30 AM
bulletman bulletman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,103
Default 25-06 vs. .270

The question is whether you are loading or using factory ammo. I have both. The .270 is more of an ''all-around'' rifle and ammo is much cheaper, more available with more selection. It's really nice to have a couple of rifles that don't dislodge fillings when you range-test them!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-08-2013, 07:34 AM
rembo rembo is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Posts: 1,314
Default

Go with the 25-06...good deer cartridge and any moose or elk properly hit with a 100 gr TSX or a 120 Partition out of the 25-06 will die just a quickly as one hit with anything out of a 270.
Everyone and thier dog, and maybe even the horse they rode in on has a 270...buck the trend, be your own man, run a 25-06..:-)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-08-2013, 07:46 AM
jrs
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have both cartridges, id say go 270, 25-06 ammo is a fair bit more expensive, and has been difficult to find lately. You can usually find the premium stuff, but generally the more affordable bullets have been out of stock. Ive even had trouble finding brass for reloading lately (25-06), just the way it goes.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-08-2013, 09:15 AM
Ronji Ronji is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 840
Default

270 all the way. I beleive that the 25-06 is far too light for moose.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-08-2013, 09:32 AM
addictedfisherman's Avatar
addictedfisherman addictedfisherman is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 271
Default

My trick is to just use the 300 while I have an open moose or Elk tag. As soon as I have my moose I switch over to the smaller cal. As long as you can shoot well, the 25-06 will put a moose, elk or bear down like nobodys business. If you reload there's lots of options for brass. And like a couple other guys said. Whats the fun in having the same gun your neighbor and his dog are shooting.

If you want a 7mm mag i would buy the 25-06, sell the 300 short mag and buy a 338 of some kind. Then, if you are just hunting deer or antelope you bring the 25-06, for deer and moose/Elk hunts you take the 7mm and when your just hunting moose, Elk or bear, take the 338.
__________________
“We are measured more as hunters by the things we choose not to shoot, than by those that we do.”
Keith McCafferty
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-08-2013, 09:59 AM
ShawnM's Avatar
ShawnM ShawnM is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,923
Default

Go for the .270. Yes it's an older cartridge but it's still in the top three selling for a reason.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-08-2013, 10:03 AM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by missingtwo View Post
You have a 30 caliber. Your going to get a 284 caliber (7mm). Thats real close to .277. You just as well jump down to .257.
I own a .270 and think it's a pretty fine round. But if you are also going to get a 7mm then I think missingtwo has it right above. The 7mm can be your back-up for moose and elk.

If you don't get the 7mm, then get the .270 for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-08-2013, 10:06 AM
Metalmike123's Avatar
Metalmike123 Metalmike123 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,024
Default

Another vote for the 270 win in this case, since you are looking to hunt moose and elk. 25-06 is capable in skilled hands, but doesn't fill the criteria like the 270 in my opinion. I just bought a new 25-06 though and I can't wait to try it
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-08-2013, 10:22 AM
benamen's Avatar
benamen benamen is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lloydminster AB/SK
Posts: 1,348
Default

Personally I would go with the 270 due to your statement that the new rifle will be used for moose and elk. I've had the 270 asmy only rifle for 25 years. I felt under gunned when it came to moose so stepped up to the 300WSM.
__________________
2011 Hoyt Carbon Element AP Camo, 60# (RKT Cams)
HDX rest
Hoyt Carbon Pro Sight
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-08-2013, 10:33 AM
kabaner kabaner is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 43
Default

25-06 all the way. I have been shooting one for 10 years and haven't been in too many situations where I was under gunned and couldn’t shoot (occasional elk past 300m). This year my wife and I took a moose an elk with it no problem (both one shot one kill). Shoots flat, minimal recoil (see bullet impact) and fast. You already have a 30cal, 270 really isn’t much of a step down if you are looking for a smaller caliber hunting rifle with some feyness. I am not going to knock a 270, they are exceptional caliber as well.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-08-2013, 10:35 AM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kabaner View Post
270 really isn’t much of a step down if you are looking for a smaller caliber hunting rifle with some feyness. .
Yeah, that's what every guy wants... some feyness.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-08-2013, 10:38 AM
score's Avatar
score score is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,974
Default

From what you stated, another vote for the .270 here. Good luck.
__________________
Every day is Military Appreciation Day!
Blue Lives Matter!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-08-2013, 11:37 AM
boner54 boner54 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 70
Default

I shoot a 25-06 and love it. Never have I had an issue with anything walking away after the trigger is pulled. I also have a .338 which is awesome. If was thinking of a .270, I would go to a .280, in my opinion this is the most under rated (.280) cal tout there.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-08-2013, 11:44 AM
helluvahunter helluvahunter is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Turin, AB
Posts: 371
Default

Another vote for the 25-06
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-08-2013, 11:55 AM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,780
Default

IMHO when comparing the .25-06 and the .270 really the only thing that is different is the selection in bullets. If you want to shoot a light bullet 120gr and less then pick the 25-06, if you want to shoot heavier than that then go with the .270....there are reasons a 25-06 "kicks less" it is because typically the bullets used are lighter than in a .270.

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-08-2013, 12:28 PM
cds cds is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Fort Saskatchewan
Posts: 116
Default

Go with the 25-06 I have handloaded 5 different rounds for the caliber. Now I am pushing a 85Grain GS Custom loaded with 55 grains of 4007 going 3675fps. I got no problems pulling the trigger on a moose, elk, or bears, everything i shoot with gun is dead with one shot. My wife shot her 800 pound cow moose two years ago with this rifle loaded with a 100 grain Nosler partition at 213 yrds. she dropped like a ton of bricks.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-08-2013, 12:31 PM
Jordan Smith's Avatar
Jordan Smith Jordan Smith is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,363
Default

Grab the 7RM and instead of a .270 or .25-06, pick up a .260 Rem
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-08-2013, 05:44 PM
Big Daddy Badger Big Daddy Badger is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,558
Default

270 because of the availability of ammo.
25-06 can be slim pickins.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-08-2013, 11:08 PM
Dudes2010's Avatar
Dudes2010 Dudes2010 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Strathcona County
Posts: 147
Default 270!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShawnM View Post
Go for the .270. Yes it's an older cartridge but it's still in the top three selling for a reason.
Agreed, .270 Win is a beauty. Does it all. Cheers.......
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-09-2013, 05:56 AM
Albertaguide's Avatar
Albertaguide Albertaguide is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 268
Default

Hate to add a fly to the ointment but have you considered splitting the difference and going with a 264. Europeans regularly use the 6.5x55 swede for moose. Combine that with a great sectional density and ballistic coefficient it's a killer. My wife and son use my old sporterized m-96.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-09-2013, 07:15 AM
rmatei rmatei is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 317
Default

I'm a 270 fan but buy them both, what the hell it's only money.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.