Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 12-22-2008, 03:42 PM
bowman077 bowman077 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 65
Default

Nicely said Camshaft!!!

I don't think I could add anything more.

Except it should be illegal to advertise locations of Photo Radar.
  #92  
Old 12-22-2008, 03:42 PM
Wheatland KB's Avatar
Wheatland KB Wheatland KB is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5
Default

Great Forum. First Post.

Of course Photo Radar is a cash cow. Great buisness idea. It is a volantary Tax. If you don't want to pay it...Don't Speed.
  #93  
Old 12-22-2008, 03:58 PM
2430M
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wheatland KB View Post
Great Forum. First Post.
Welcome
  #94  
Old 12-22-2008, 04:21 PM
Stonecutter's Avatar
Stonecutter Stonecutter is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Parkland County, Alberta
Posts: 336
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by twofifty View Post
Interesting story about the red car.

Anyone know how long is the delay between the radar unit cyphering a vehicle's speed, and the moment that the camera shutter takes the picture?

Lots can happen in a tenth of a second at 60mph: like 8.79 feet !
That's approx. half a vehicle's length, or enough for the red car to exit the picture before the image is captured, or to hide behind yours.

How to use that in court is another matter.
I can't remember what it was, but a while back Mythbusters had a show about photo radar. They said how fast the cameras take photos after the radar goes off. It was stupid fast. I was trying to find the information on the interweb earlier, and all I could find was THIS LINK.
  #95  
Old 12-22-2008, 07:01 PM
beansgunsghandi beansgunsghandi is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canadian Rockies
Posts: 456
Default Ya gotta try.

Wheatland says, "Of course Photo Radar is a cash cow. Great buisness idea. It is a volantary Tax. If you don't want to pay it...Don't Speed."

Wheatland, I too finally signed into this forum after reading it for a long time, so newbies unite or something!

But the whole point I've been writing about, and people seem to miss it somehow, is that I wasn't speeding. My vehicle was... Do I not let my wife drive my truck? Or my dad? Or my friend? We're talking 12K over the limit on a road with no cross-intersections in the area, going downhill.

And it's not a "volantary" tax, I didn' speed and I'm getting taxed for it.

Camshaft: I am going to plead not guilty, and that may be a waste of my time and the judge's time as you state. But I'd rather protest this nonsense even in a small way. I will try the charter defense (reasonable doubt) based on the fact that I have done due diligence in lending my vehicle as defined by the traffic act, we'll see how that goes. If I've done due diligence and have a statement that I definitely wasn't driving (my wife and I have argued that one through, she was driving) then I'll be curious to see what the judge says--in my mind that's pretty clear evidence that the crown hasn't proved me guilty at all... The judge here has made some interesting rulings in the past, decent guy. I'll still likely lose but it is a slightly different angle than what I've seen in the other cases I've read. I understand enough about law to understand what you're saying, but even if it goes against me then I've protested it, that's what being a citizen is all about.

And yes to Mr. Puffypants.
  #96  
Old 12-22-2008, 07:11 PM
Loper Loper is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 170
Default

I believe you are not guilty of speeding Beans but the thing is you are not charged with speeding with a photo radar ticket. You are charged with being the registered owner of a vehicle that was speeding. Of that you are going to be found guilty.
  #97  
Old 12-22-2008, 07:22 PM
Loper Loper is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 170
Default

Here is the section of the Traffic Safety Act that allows them to charge you.



Owner liable

160(1) If a vehicle is involved in an offence referred to in section 157 or a bylaw, the owner of that vehicle is guilty of an offence.

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the owner of the vehicle satisfies the court that, at the time that the vehicle was involved in an offence referred to in section 157 or a bylaw,

(a) in the case of a vehicle that was in motion,

(i) the owner of the vehicle was not driving the vehicle, and

(ii) no other person was driving the vehicle with the owner’s expressed or implied consent,

and

(b) in the case of a vehicle that was parked,

(i) the owner did not park the vehicle, and

(ii) no other person parked the vehicle with the owner’s expressed or implied consent.

(3) An owner who is guilty of an offence under this section is not liable to imprisonment in respect of that offence or in respect of a default of a fine imposed in respect of that offence
  #98  
Old 12-22-2008, 11:41 PM
BBJTKLE&FISHINGADVENTURES BBJTKLE&FISHINGADVENTURES is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fort Saskatchewan Ab
Posts: 8,926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wheatland KB View Post
Great Forum. First Post.

Of course Photo Radar is a cash cow. Great buisness idea. It is a volantary Tax. If you don't want to pay it...Don't Speed.
Welcome Aboard , and well said.
  #99  
Old 12-23-2008, 08:21 AM
rhuntley12 rhuntley12 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SW of Dewinton
Posts: 2,129
Default

Problem is there is no leeway, like someone else said what about that car passing you at high speed, I've been worried before on Glenmore as I drive a decent sized truck and I had a small I think bug haul past me and I saw a flash. I didn't get a ticket as I think the bug was in the picture but what if it was hidden behind my truck?

Also, I would like to see more enforcement on Deerfoot, a year of driving on it to and from work and I think I've only seen 2 people pulled over.
  #100  
Old 12-23-2008, 09:06 AM
Wheatland KB's Avatar
Wheatland KB Wheatland KB is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beansgunsghandi View Post
But the whole point I've been writing about, and people seem to miss it somehow, is that I wasn't speeding. My vehicle was... Do I not let my wife drive my truck? Or my dad? Or my friend? We're talking 12K over the limit on a road with no cross-intersections in the area, going downhill.
.

Sorry that I just gave thoughts without qualifying to the OP. There are many situations where you may be at no fault. I get photo tickets sent to me with pictures of the wife all the time. A car passing you etc... I cannot comment on. It has been my experience that the ticket will be thrown out you go to your court date and plead your case to the prosecutor before you are called up...especially if it is anything below 15k over the limit. I was on a first aid course a couple of months ago with an ex-RCMP and a Calgary City Officer who both said they didn't ticket up to 15K over.

Good luck.
  #101  
Old 12-24-2008, 01:44 PM
Puma's Avatar
Puma Puma is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: WMU 214
Posts: 1,816
Default Multinova

Quote:
Originally Posted by gitrdun View Post
If they sent a picture of your trucking speeding, why not send them a picture of you in the act of writing a cheque?
and they will send you a picture of hand cuffs.

I contested two multi cash grab tickets and beat both of them. The camera operator makes more money in his van then in court. he wont show up to fight one ticket.

Puma
  #102  
Old 12-26-2008, 11:09 AM
ElkCanyon ElkCanyon is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 40
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rem338win View Post
I like how you really brought out the "douche" in that picture. He'll have fun with that one in court. An alarm clock sure would help some of these @ssh@ts quit being in such a fricken' rush.

There is nothing in the Highway Traffic Act that says it is an offense to pass on a double or single solid line. The lines are suggestions made up by infrastructure road crews - it could be slightly different from crew to crew. It is however, unlawful to make an unsafe pass - and that's arguable - if visibility is good and one can see farther comparing a pickup to a car say, then a safe pass can be made on a solid line of any kind if there's no oncoming traffic.

Admittedly, those places on our roads are few, but they are there.
  #103  
Old 12-26-2008, 11:40 AM
Rackmastr Rackmastr is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElkCanyon View Post
There is nothing in the Highway Traffic Act that says it is an offense to pass on a double or single solid line. The lines are suggestions made up by infrastructure road crews - it could be slightly different from crew to crew. It is however, unlawful to make an unsafe pass - and that's arguable - if visibility is good and one can see farther comparing a pickup to a car say, then a safe pass can be made on a solid line of any kind if there's no oncoming traffic.

Admittedly, those places on our roads are few, but they are there.
You are not looking deep enough into legislation to see some of the laws. The Traffic Safety Act (HTA is no longer in use) contains regulations that are seperate from the TSA. In this case you would need to look in the "Use of Highway and Rules of the Road Regulation".

Rules for traffic lanes

15(1) When operating a vehicle on a highway,

(a) in the case where double solid lines exist between traffic lanes, a person shall not drive the vehicle so that the vehicle or any portion of the vehicle crosses the double solid lines from one traffic lane to another;

(b) in the case of a highway in an urban area where a single solid line only exists between traffic lanes, a person shall not drive the vehicle so that the vehicle or any portion of the vehicle crosses the single solid line from one traffic lane to another except when overtaking and passing another vehicle;

(c) in the case of a highway outside an urban area where a single solid line only exists between traffic lanes, a person shall not drive the vehicle so that the vehicle or any portion of the vehicle crosses the single solid line from one traffic lane to another;

(d) in the case where a single solid line and a broken line exist together between traffic lanes, a person

(i) shall not, except as permitted under subclause (ii), drive the vehicle so that the vehicle or any portion of the vehicle crosses the solid line from the traffic lane next to which the solid line is located, and

(ii) may only drive the vehicle so as to cross to the left over the broken and solid lines from the traffic lane next to which the broken line is located for the purpose of and when overtaking and passing another vehicle in that traffic lane and shall, as soon as that other vehicle is safely passed, recross both lines and return to the traffic lane on the right in which that person’s vehicle was originally travelling;

(e) in the case where

(i) the roadway consists of only 2 traffic lanes that carry traffic in opposite directions, and

(ii) only one or more broken lines exist between the 2 traffic lanes,

a person may only drive the vehicle so as to cross to the left over the broken line from that person’s traffic lane into the traffic lane carrying the oncoming traffic for the purpose of overtaking and passing another vehicle that is travelling in the right traffic lane and shall as soon as that other vehicle is safely passed return to the traffic lane in which that person’s vehicle was originally travelling;

(f) in the case where

(i) the roadway consists of 2 or more traffic lanes that carry traffic in one direction only, and

(ii) only one or more broken lines exist between the traffic lanes,

a person may, with respect to those traffic lanes, drive the vehicle so as to cross the broken lines from one traffic lane into another traffic lane.
  #104  
Old 12-27-2008, 10:15 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 44,825
Default

Anyone that believes that photo radar is infallible,needs to learn about cosine error.Unless the photo radar vehicle is parked perfectly,the results will not be accurate.

http://www.cyberbeach.net/~mtrenout/errors.html

As far as warning signs are concerned,there is a set of guidelines set forth by the government that the people using the photo radar are required to follow.

http://www.justice.gov.ab.ca/publica...t.aspx?id=2512

One guideline that they are required to follow,but they usually ignore is:

Quote:
Signage should inform drivers about photo radar locations:
The quote is taken directly from the link above.After reading all of the the guidelines,it is very obvious ,that many photo radar tickets are in fact not issued in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the government.As such,those tickets are not legally issued tickets.

Last edited by elkhunter11; 12-27-2008 at 10:41 AM.
  #105  
Old 12-27-2008, 10:25 AM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,526
Default

the radio stations in the Fort always let listeners know where the photo radar is set up.
I think that if it helps people slow down, have at it.
I work on the Syncrude site amd drive to work every day.
Untill the traffic got so congested that traffic naturally slowed down, even the presence of a squad car would slow drivers down.
of course, there was still the odd 160KM ticket being handed out!

people up here seem to drive at insane speeds, especialy on HWY63 and 881.
The highways get blamed as being dangerous, but if people were not driving at
warp 2 there would not be nearly the amount of accidents and deaths on our highways up here.
I haven't had a speeding ticket for over 20 years, but then I don't drive way over the limit on the highway ( 105KPH normally) and I drive the posted limits in town.
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
  #106  
Old 02-10-2009, 11:19 PM
Niglin Niglin is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1
Default

Since photo radar does not affect your insurance rates etc... what incentive is there to pay, what can they do if you never paid it? (Appreciate the input, excuse my ignorance in the matter)
  #107  
Old 02-10-2009, 11:38 PM
Vindalbakken Vindalbakken is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,790
Default

Since the ticket is issued to the registered owner, it would seem reasonable to me that they would deny the right to renew the registration till such leins are paid in full.
  #108  
Old 02-11-2009, 01:49 AM
BBJTKLE&FISHINGADVENTURES BBJTKLE&FISHINGADVENTURES is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fort Saskatchewan Ab
Posts: 8,926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niglin View Post
Since photo radar does not affect your insurance rates etc... what incentive is there to pay, what can they do if you never paid it? (Appreciate the input, excuse my ignorance in the matter)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vindalbakken View Post
Since the ticket is issued to the registered owner, it would seem reasonable to me that they would deny the right to renew the registration till such leins are paid in full.
Not only not being able to register your vehicle you also after a certain amount of time I believe get a lovely letter plus fees added on by Alberta justice and if you continue to refuse to pay I think eventually will post a warrant , not sure if that's with photo radar , but I know with traffic tickets and parking tickets after a certain time they put a warrant for your arrest .
  #109  
Old 02-11-2009, 02:04 AM
The cooter's Avatar
The cooter The cooter is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer Alberta
Posts: 783
Default The way out

From what I understand the best way is to pay it buy check and make it for $1 more than the ticket.They will send you a check back for one dollar and if you do not cash that check for a dollar they can not finish the paper work on there end so it does not get processed and there for never ends up on your record and the insurance companys never now about it.Or the registrie.So you can go about your way with out hasle.
__________________
This is gonna get messy..........................
  #110  
Old 02-11-2009, 07:27 AM
Rackmastr Rackmastr is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGBADJOHN View Post
but I know with traffic tickets and parking tickets after a certain time they put a warrant for your arrest .
Thats only partly true. There are two types of 'tickets' you can get as an individual. Anyone who has ever gotten a 'yellow' ticket for speeding will never have a warrant issued for arrest. These are tickets that are often speeding and moving violations. If you are issued a 'pink' ticket and do not pay then a warrant for your arrest can be issued. These are offenses such as littering, peeing in public, etc, You will not have a warrant issued for photo-radar or for parking as the offenses are 'Registered Owner' tickets and are applied on the vehicle registration. If unpaid, the vehicle is not able to be registered at the end of the year. And yea...probably some extended late fees.....
  #111  
Old 02-11-2009, 07:35 AM
troller
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rackmastr View Post
These are tickets that are often speeding and moving violations. If you are issued a 'pink' ticket and do not pay then a warrant for your arrest can be issued.
A warrant will be issued for not appearing in court, not for unpaid fine as the pink tickets don't show a fine amount.

"Yellow tickets versus pink tickets

A police officer can provide you with a “yellow” or “pink” ticket. A pink ticket is called a Summons and it has a mandatory court date. There is no fine specified on a pink ticket. This means that you are required to appear before a Judge/Commissioner and he or she will decide the penalty. If you do not appear in Court on a pink ticket, in most cases a warrant will be issued for your arrest.



If you are found guilty of the charge on your Summons the Judge/Commissioner has the option of suspending your licence and imposing jail time."
  #112  
Old 02-11-2009, 08:22 AM
thundergrey's Avatar
thundergrey thundergrey is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams View Post
...but I've had 6 month's grace and the buggar that wrote me the tickets, will have to spend two days in court. As it is, I feell I have a good chance of beating both.
Grizz
to bad they get paid for it and we dont even if we win. that should be the next step suing the crown for lost time!
  #113  
Old 02-11-2009, 08:25 AM
thundergrey's Avatar
thundergrey thundergrey is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 483
Default

Kind of off topic, but didnt Edmonton pass a idling ban? why is it that the photo radar van is sitting on the side of the road running? or are they above the law?
  #114  
Old 02-11-2009, 08:29 AM
Sporty Sporty is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Just North of the 55th Parallel
Posts: 1,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beansgunsghandi View Post
Camshaft writes, "The bottom line is simple, and has been stated time and time again....dont speed, and u will not get a ticket."

I and others do have a massive issue with getting a ticket when we weren't the ones speeding. I wasn't speeding, and I got a ticket. The above statement is wrong. Or, from the crown's perspective, my vehicle got a ticket. In Europe if you get a ticket driving a vehicle they send you a picture of the person behind the wheel. I've paid those tickets without even thinking about it. This is different.

You assume responsibility when you allow someone else to drive your vehicle. Even though not guilty you are responsible for the person that you allow to drive your vehicle. Same concept applies if your car was in an accident and you weren't the driver. Insurance company would go after your insurance company, not the driver.
  #115  
Old 02-12-2009, 03:37 PM
rem338win's Avatar
rem338win rem338win is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cowtown, agian
Posts: 2,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElkCanyon View Post
There is nothing in the Highway Traffic Act that says it is an offense to pass on a double or single solid line. The lines are suggestions made up by infrastructure road crews - it could be slightly different from crew to crew. It is however, unlawful to make an unsafe pass - and that's arguable - if visibility is good and one can see farther comparing a pickup to a car say, then a safe pass can be made on a solid line of any kind if there's no oncoming traffic.

Admittedly, those places on our roads are few, but they are there.
Wow you don't have any idea about the statutes do you? It is an offense to cross any solid line on the highway period. Those lines are Statutory not Regulatory and the road crews are told where to put them. That goes for the old HTA and especially in the new TSA. And there is no srguing on a unsafe pass. What constitutes an unsafe pass is clearly out lined in the TSA. Do you really thing that a third party road maintenance company is in charge of Statuatory lines on a highway

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
Anyone that believes that photo radar is infallible,needs to learn about cosine error.Unless the photo radar vehicle is parked perfectly,the results will not be accurate.

http://www.cyberbeach.net/~mtrenout/errors.html

As far as warning signs are concerned,there is a set of guidelines set forth by the government that the people using the photo radar are required to follow.

http://www.justice.gov.ab.ca/publica...t.aspx?id=2512

One guideline that they are required to follow,but they usually ignore is:



The quote is taken directly from the link above.After reading all of the the guidelines,it is very obvious ,that many photo radar tickets are in fact not issued in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the government.As such,those tickets are not legally issued tickets.
And the number one rule about cosine angle is that when radar is stationary, or moving in a straight line, the cosine error always decreases the speed measurement. That means it is in your favor.

Man the old wive's tale are great.
  #116  
Old 02-12-2009, 03:45 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 44,825
Default

Quote:
And the number one rule about cosine angle is that when radar is stationary, or moving in a straight line, the cosine error always decreases the speed measurement. That means it is in your favor.

Man the old wive's tale are great.
When you are talking about the standard radar used by the police,you are correct.However photo radar is set up differently,and the topic of this thread is photo radar.Obviously you didn't read the link that I posted before replying.

http://www.cyberbeach.net/~mtrenout/errors.html

This is from that link.You might read the example before making another incorrect reply.

Quote:
For a stationary photo radar van one of the most important of these errors is the cosine error. The Gastonomer units used in Ontario, had its beam offset at a 22 degree angle. The unit would correct the returned signal to take into account the frequency shift caused by the 22 deg angle. If the vehicle is not parked exactly parallel to the target vehicles it will affect the accuracy of the unit since the unit blindly assumes that the angle is always 22 degrees. Lets look at how a simple 10 degree shift in alignment can affect the reading, either way.

We will assume that the vehicle in question is traveling at 100km/h, the cosine of 22 ° is .9272 and the photo radar unit will add 7.28 km/h to get the correct reading for speed.
1) 100 X .9272 = 92.72km/h + 7.28km/h = Readout is 100km/h
If the van is parked with the front of the vehicle parked 10 ° away from the direction of the road, the angle would increase to 32 °. The cosine of 32 ° is .8480
2) 100 X .8480 = 84.80km/h + 7.28km/h = Readout is 92.72km/h
You get a break and your speed is lowered by 7.92km/h
Now the opposite will happen if the front of the vehicle is pointing towards the road at a 10 ° angle. The cosine of 12 ° is .9781.
3) 100 X .9781 = 97.81km/h + 7.28km/h = Readout is 105.09km/h
Your vehicle has 5.09km/h added to the actual speed and if they are operating at zero tolerance, you get a ticket.
  #117  
Old 02-12-2009, 03:59 PM
Grizzly Adams's Avatar
Grizzly Adams Grizzly Adams is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
Default

Maybe already posted, but I can't be bothered to go back and see. I heard a piece on the radio, the other day. It seems some guy fought a photo radar ticket. Turns out the calibration certificate, for the equipment, was 120 days, out of date. They figured 139,000 tickets were illegally issued and most people just paid them.

I've got a court date next friday. Winter entertainment. I was charged with speeding and failing to stop for a peace officer, last July. Court date was set for Feb. 20. So a couple of days ago, I got a letter from the Crown, advising that a "key witness" was unavailable for the trial and they would be seeking an adjournmet. I'll be asking for a Dismisal.
Grizz
__________________
"Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal."
John E. Pfeiffer The Emergence of Man
written in 1969
  #118  
Old 02-12-2009, 04:21 PM
thundergrey's Avatar
thundergrey thundergrey is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 483
Default

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rem338win
Wow you don't have any idea about the statutes do you? It is an offense to cross any solid line on the highway period. Those lines are Statutory not Regulatory and the road crews are told
Nither do you i guess then. Single lanes are fair game


Quote:
Quote:
Rules for traffic lanes

15(1) When operating a vehicle on a highway,

(b) in the case of a highway in an urban area where a single solid line only exists between traffic lanes, a person shall not drive the vehicle so that the vehicle or any portion of the vehicle crosses the single solid line from one traffic lane to another except when overtaking and passing another vehicle;
right from: http://www.qp.gov.ab.ca/documents/Re...sbn=0779738624

Last edited by thundergrey; 02-12-2009 at 04:29 PM.
  #119  
Old 02-12-2009, 05:03 PM
Sporty Sporty is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Just North of the 55th Parallel
Posts: 1,477
Default

Well, some of these posts certainly gives me a clearer understanding of why we have so many great drivers on the roads here in AB. We have those that are ignorant of laws (passing on solid lines) and those that have no regard for laws (speeding and failing to stop for peace officers). Nice to know that wasting the court's and law enforcement's time and tax payers money is considered "winter entertainment".


Quote:
(b)if, in an urban area, a single solid line only exists between
traffic lanes, a driver shall not cross the single solid line
from one lane to another except when overtaking and
passing another vehicle;
(c)if, outside an urban area, a single solid line only exists
between traffic lanes, a driver shall not cross the single
solid line from one lane to another;



Definition of Urban: Of, relating to or located in a city



http://www.canlii.org/ab/laws/sta/h-8/20030217/whole.html
  #120  
Old 02-12-2009, 06:13 PM
thundergrey's Avatar
thundergrey thundergrey is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sporty View Post
Well, some of these posts certainly gives me a clearer understanding of why we have so many great drivers on the roads here in AB. We have those that are ignorant of laws (passing on solid lines) and those that have no regard for laws (speeding and failing to stop for peace officers). Nice to know that wasting the court's and law enforcement's time and tax payers money is considered "winter entertainment".

dont be too mad. 75% of peace officers dont know either
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.