|
|
06-12-2017, 06:48 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 769
|
|
Supreme Court to Rule on President Trump's Travel Ban Today
Apparently the Supreme Court is going to Rule on President Trump's Travel Ban Today.
Anyone want to bet that they will overturn the lower court's or should I say the Liberal court's injunction?
Last edited by 338 Rules; 06-12-2017 at 06:57 AM.
|
06-12-2017, 07:55 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Blackfalds
Posts: 6,952
|
|
Wouldn't that be awesome.
The president should be able to say who can, and cannot come into their country
|
06-12-2017, 08:13 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 769
|
|
Sure would. I expect it because under the Constitution the President has full desecration in making that decision.
|
06-12-2017, 09:35 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,387
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules
Apparently the Supreme Court is going to Rule on President Trump's Travel Ban Today.
Anyone want to bet that they will overturn the lower court's or should I say the Liberal court's injunction?
|
Just because I enjoy you so much - i'll take that bet!
Cheers
__________________
~Men and fish are alike. They both get into trouble when they open their mouths.~
|
06-12-2017, 09:44 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 769
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags
Just because I enjoy you so much - i'll take that bet!
Cheers
|
How much? $100.00 I like you too wags so I know you will honor your bet, as I will!
|
06-12-2017, 09:53 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,387
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules
How much? $100.00 I like you too wags so I know you will honor your bet, as I will!
|
Where do you live? I think a meal would be good.
Cheers
__________________
~Men and fish are alike. They both get into trouble when they open their mouths.~
|
06-12-2017, 10:36 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,387
|
|
An accord has been reached.
__________________
~Men and fish are alike. They both get into trouble when they open their mouths.~
|
06-12-2017, 11:47 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,387
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags
An accord has been reached.
|
Should be a fun lunch!
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...-court-n771091
__________________
~Men and fish are alike. They both get into trouble when they open their mouths.~
|
06-12-2017, 11:55 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,392
|
|
Lol. And lol is lightly said
Would take the bet if I read this earlier.
|
06-12-2017, 12:04 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,392
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiabeticKripple
The president should be able to say who can, and cannot come into their country
|
I believe that would be the case in monarchy/dictatorship/etc. Civilized world does not run this way.
|
06-12-2017, 12:16 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules
President has full desecration in making that decision.
|
Hilariously, mistakenly, a gem of a description. LOL
From Wikipedia:
Desecration is the act of depriving something of its sacred character, or the disrespectful, contemptuous, or destructive treatment of that which is held to be sacred or holy by a group or individual.
Yup, that's Donald.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsAdvocate
In this case Oki has cut to to the exact heart of the matter!
|
|
06-12-2017, 12:17 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 17,790
|
|
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...ysis-not-legal
Quote:
When Willie Sutton was once asked “why do you pick banks to rob,” he replied “because that’s where the money is.” Not all the money, but enough of it to prioritize banks. Similarly, when asked why these six countries were prioritized, the Trump administration responds, “because that’s where the terrorists are,” — not all of them but these countries aren’t vetting them properly.
The inclusion of the six Islamic countries in the travel ban is rational. It may not be the best list. Perhaps there should be no country list at all. But that is a judgement allocated by Congress and the Constitution to the executive branch. It is subject, of course, to the constraints of the Constitution. But the judicial branch will generally defer to the executive branch on matters involving national security, unless there is a clear violation of the Constitution.
In my opinion, that high threshold has not been reached in this case. So I predict the Supreme Court, if it gets the case, will find the new executive order constitutional.
|
|
06-12-2017, 12:17 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,181
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bub
I believe that would be the case in monarchy/dictatorship/etc. Civilized world does not run this way.
|
Except monarchs/dictators are not usually elected to lead their country.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
|
06-12-2017, 12:25 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 769
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bub
Lol. And lol is lightly said
Would take the bet if I read this earlier.
|
Supreme Court has not ruled yet, am I missing something??
|
06-12-2017, 12:26 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 17,790
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules
Supreme Court has not ruled yet, am I missing something??
|
They are confusing the VERY liberal 9th circuit for the Supreme Court.
|
06-12-2017, 12:27 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,646
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags
|
Did he not state the Supreme Court ? Your link is to a federal appeals court ruling
|
06-12-2017, 12:30 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,387
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules
Supreme Court has not ruled yet, am I missing something??
|
My bad, I just saw the headline - we shall continue to wait.
__________________
~Men and fish are alike. They both get into trouble when they open their mouths.~
|
06-12-2017, 12:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,387
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rugatika
They are confusing the VERY liberal 9th circuit for the Supreme Court.
|
Yes of course, Liberal court - my bad.
__________________
~Men and fish are alike. They both get into trouble when they open their mouths.~
|
06-12-2017, 12:32 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,387
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rugatika
|
Better ban Americans, that's who goes into school and shoots kids!
__________________
~Men and fish are alike. They both get into trouble when they open their mouths.~
|
06-12-2017, 12:33 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,387
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stringer
Did he not state the Supreme Court ? Your link is to a federal appeals court ruling
|
Yes he did Stringer. For once, you are correct
__________________
~Men and fish are alike. They both get into trouble when they open their mouths.~
Last edited by wags; 06-12-2017 at 12:41 PM.
|
06-12-2017, 12:38 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 769
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags
Yes of course, Liberal court - my bad.
|
wags, If I lose (which I highly doubt) anywhere but Tim Hortons ok? I heard their prices went up
|
06-12-2017, 12:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,387
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules
wags, If I lose (which I highly doubt) anywhere but Tim Hortons ok? I heard their prices went up
|
Oh I wouldn't eat at Timmie's when someone else is paying
__________________
~Men and fish are alike. They both get into trouble when they open their mouths.~
|
06-12-2017, 12:43 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 769
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags
Oh I wouldn't eat at Timmie's when someone else is paying
|
I knew you had class!!!!
|
06-12-2017, 12:44 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,387
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules
I knew you had class!!!!
|
lol
__________________
~Men and fish are alike. They both get into trouble when they open their mouths.~
|
06-12-2017, 01:04 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,392
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules
Supreme Court has not ruled yet, am I missing something??
|
All I am saying is that it is funny that you think the ban will be put in place.
Is the ruling (by Supreme Court) even supposed to take place today?
|
06-12-2017, 01:06 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 769
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bub
All I am saying is that it is funny that you think the ban will be put in place.
Is the ruling (by Supreme Court) even supposed to take place today?
|
I heard the the Supreme Court was going to rush the hearing forward and would rule on it today, maybe I misunderstood???
|
06-12-2017, 01:11 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,217
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules
I heard the the Supreme Court was going to rush the hearing forward and would rule on it today, maybe I misunderstood???
|
You "misunderstood" Big Time!
Best check your facts, before you start a thread
.
|
06-12-2017, 01:13 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 769
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gray Wolf
You "misunderstood" Big Time!
Best check your facts, before you start a thread
.
|
Maybe I am incorrect!
wags is the bet still on with the SC decision? I am partial to The Keg
|
06-12-2017, 01:14 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,392
|
|
No ruling today. Hence, whatever wag had posted is what I though you were talking about.
Quote:
Those opposed to President Trump's travel ban have until Monday afternoon to file responses to a petition filed with the Supreme Court, according to CNN.
Currently, justices are deciding whether they will take on the Trump Administration's appeal on his travel ban. As they do that, the Trump Administration is asking the Supreme Court to let his travel ban go into effect.
Monday's deadline comes about two weeks before the Supreme Courts' term is scheduled to end.
|
|
06-12-2017, 01:20 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 769
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bub
No ruling today. Hence, whatever wag had posted is what I though you were talking about.
"Those opposed to President Trump's travel ban have until Monday afternoon to file responses to a petition filed with the Supreme Court, according to CNN."
|
oh, my bad!
When it comes to CNN, I would not know what they are reporting, I refuse to watch Very Fake News!
Last edited by 338 Rules; 06-12-2017 at 01:37 PM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 AM.
|