Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2008, 08:20 AM
jefferson jefferson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 59
Default Crestliner/Free Spirit Marine

I was wondering about current opinions of Free Spirit Marine, and Crestliner. We're looking at a 1700 Superhawk from Free Spirit. Anyone own one of these boats, or had experience with Free Spirit? We're hoping this is the boat for us for a long time.

Right now, we're looking at the 90 2 Stroke, or the 115 Optimax.

Any thoughts/advice?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-28-2008, 08:49 AM
JohninAB's Avatar
JohninAB JohninAB is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Central Alberta
Posts: 6,670
Default

I just picked up a boat from them for my sister, the Crestliner 1600 SC. Seemed like good people to deal with, their prices were bout the best we found and they include everything in your boat purchase whereas a lot of dealers do not (ie at some places you had to pay extra for the spare tire for the trailer, Free Spirit includes this in their price along with 4 life jackets, docking rope, battereies for trolling motor and cranking, first aid kit, safety kit and 2 dock bumpers). Do know if you have not got a boat from them by now, you may be waiting for awhile to get one but that is pretty standard across the board at this time of the year. The trolling motor they supply you with is a Trojan Deep Cycle so it is not some cheapo brand either.

As far as the motor, I would recommend the Optimax as it is a better motor than the plain jane 2 stroke.

As far as Crestliner boats are concerned, they are highly rated and built by the same company who builds Lunds. Lifetime warranty on the hull. I rank Crestliner, Lund and Princecraft as the top 3 in my books for aluminum boats.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-28-2008, 08:56 AM
jefferson jefferson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 59
Default

Thanks for the info, John- I read your previous posts on Free Spirit, as well. It does sound like we'll be waiting a while, but that's okay; we're trading in our current boat, so at least we've got something to hit the water in until our Crestliner arrives.

Wondering if you can elaborate a bit for me; why would you consider the Optimax a better engine than the original 2-stroke? I'm not too current on the technology. I would assume the emissions would be better; would the performance suffer?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2008, 09:01 AM
chuck0039 chuck0039 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,052
Default

My buddy bought his 19 ft tournement boat from them. He like the service he said it felt like a family run business that care about the customer. The only problems he had was the pass thru window rubbed when closed and the travel tarp ripped where the post goes. Free spirit fixed everything with no complaints or problems.
__________________
Fire up the grill cause deer huntin ain't catch and release
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-28-2008, 09:58 AM
JohninAB's Avatar
JohninAB JohninAB is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Central Alberta
Posts: 6,670
Default

The Optimax has a better emissions system plus is fuel injected and would get better fuel mileage too I would assume. Also it has a better factory warranty then the plain jane 2 stroke. Has a belt driven alternator as well so puts out more amps for batteries. That is all that comes to my mind right now. With the 90 hp 2 stroke, if it came From Crestliner mounted on the boat as a package, then it would get covered under Crestliner's 3 year warranty, otherwise it is only one year warranty on it, whereas the Optimax is at least 3years from Mercury. Plus the upgrade in HP would make a huge difference as well in the performance of your boat. I would have went with the 75 Optimax on my boat but the extra cost right now for me and the other bills I had held me back for this year. Next year I hope to upgrade to the Optimax.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-28-2008, 05:45 PM
dugh dugh is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: WMU 250
Posts: 745
Default

I think Free Spirit is OK. Like other businesses they are probably short staffed. My wife and I have a 2007 1700 Mirage, we love it. Its a blast. Crestliner builds a nice boat.
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-28-2008, 06:13 PM
jefferson jefferson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 59
Default

Thanks to all; some very helpful stuff here, I appreciate it. I was wondering about the weight of the 115 Optimax v. the 90 2 Stroke- would the extra 100lbs of weight make the upgrade in HP a little less effective? I've also heard that the Optimax would have to be serviced by a pro, whereas I've been able to do a lot of the work on my 50 HP 2 stroke myself.

Doug; I think the Mirage is very similar to the Superhawk, from what I've seen. What engine do you have on yours, and how does it perform?

Thanks again!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-29-2008, 10:47 AM
Waxy Waxy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,203
Default

Go Optimax. I guarantee you won't regret it.

The extra hp alone is worth the upgrade, there's nothing worse than an underpowered boat.

The advantages of the Opti make it a no brainer. You'll practically save the difference in up front cost back in fuel/oil consumption, it will smoke way less, it will start easier, it will idle better, it's much quieter, and it's more powerful all through the powerband.

The difference in weight is negligable, it has a better warranty, and resale will be much better as well.

It's new techology vs. old, and in this case, the new technology is truly superior. The Mercury Optimax is consistently rated #1 for customer satisfaction.

Waxy

P.S. I have no affiliation with Mercury, I'm just a real happy Optimax owner.

P.P.S. I'm a Lund guy myself, but Crestliner does make a nice boat.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-29-2008, 11:04 AM
chuck0039 chuck0039 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waxy View Post
The advantages of the Opti make it a no brainer. You'll practically save the difference in up front cost back in fuel/oil consumption, it will smoke way less, it will start easier, it will idle better, it's much quieter, and it's more powerful all through the powerband.

.
My buddy has a 200 hp suzuki on his crestliner and you can not hear that thing run. it is as quite as a car. I think it is like a vehicle you just put gas in it and go. Every so many hours you change the oil in it. no more oil gas mix.

Jefferson put on what you want for brand name. Waxy is right an underpowered boat sucks so go with good HP. but don't rule out suzuki from what i have seen that is a nice motor as well and easy on fuel, depending how it is driven.
__________________
Fire up the grill cause deer huntin ain't catch and release
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-29-2008, 06:29 PM
Winch101 Winch101 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Okotoks wilderness
Posts: 4,420
Default merc 4 strk

Am I missing something here , why wouldnt you go to a 4 strk .

I have a 1650 .07 Crest. with 90 4 strk , goes over 40 mph , trolls down nice ( for a ninety ) I have owned a doz mercs over 50 hp and mostly lunds .

But that 4 strk , no smoke , no oil , They are already taliking in the USA about no service on 2 strks .. a little cheaper but !
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-29-2008, 08:49 PM
jefferson jefferson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 59
Default

Thanks again to all; we're going up Monday to visit Free Spirit Marine so my wife and kids can see the boat. I told my wife to just take my word for it, but that didn't really go over

Waxy; I talked to the outboard tech from Free Spirit, and he strongly recommended the Optimax over the 4 Stroke, and even suggested that the old tech 2 Stroke was still a very strong option. In fact, he said he personally would rather have a 2 stroke, for ease of repairs and maintenance. Not much potential hidden motivation in that for him, as the 2 stroke and Opti would each put less $ in the dealership's pocket, both up front and on possible repairs/maintenance. I took that opinion seriously, along with other things.

I think we'll likely go with the Optimax, and may go with the extra HP; I really appreciate all the helpful advice, it has made my decision easier!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-29-2008, 08:51 PM
jefferson jefferson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 59
Default

Oops...the bit about 4 strokes in my last post was intended for "winch101", not "waxy". Sorry!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-30-2008, 07:35 AM
dugh dugh is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: WMU 250
Posts: 745
Default

Jefferson, we have the Merc. 115 4 stroke and a 9.9 4 stroke kicker. It's my first larger size boat so I have nothing to compare it to. We do about 32 mph when all loaded up. With the 4 stroke the boat comes with a higher/deeper transom which I felt would help in the rougher water. Once again I am a rookie boatsman, but after 1 season we are very happy with it. Good luck
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-30-2008, 09:23 AM
Winch101 Winch101 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Okotoks wilderness
Posts: 4,420
Default 2 vs 4 in the stroke dept

There has to be alot of 2 strks and optimax kicking around .

I know last year some 4 strks were tough to come by

thats one of the reasons it took so long to get your boat ...

I willing to bet there are some factory incentives to push those

motors . The optimax might be a little quicker out of the hole ,

but man , no smoke , you can drink the water out of that 4 strk .

Go to Boat test .com join up and see the testing ...

Deeper transom , quieter ....

I went to the boat web site , 1300lb boat + 33 gals gas + ( now here is where
it gets tricky , when you take woman boating add 300lbs . of stuff you dont need )+
the kids .etc. etc.
I have two friends with this hull and 115hp. 4 strk , that is the min. motor for this boat
go on walleye central and read the posts about 4 strks and fishing ..

Last edited by Winch101; 03-30-2008 at 09:38 AM. Reason: more info
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-30-2008, 09:37 AM
gunned gunned is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 88
Default 2 strokes

I heard that some areas are starting to ban the 2 strokes, like some provincial parks and stuff. Anyone know if that is true? That would certainly make a difference, and an indication of things to come...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-30-2008, 02:05 PM
Waxy Waxy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,203
Default

Not true.

The new directed-injected 2 strokes (Optimax, ETEC, etc... ) are completely emissions compliant and just as "enviro friendly" as the 4 strokes.

Waxy
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-30-2008, 07:56 PM
jefferson jefferson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 59
Default

Interestingly, the 115 Optimax is the one they don't have in stock; if I went with the 115 4 stroke, they've got at least one that fits our needs. The price difference isn't huge between the two 115s, but the 90 Optimax is a fair bit less. The 90 HP 2 Stroke (not Opti) is about $2400 less. Makes the decision...interesting

Thanks for the website; I'll check that out.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-30-2008, 07:57 PM
jefferson jefferson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 59
Default

Also, both the Optimax and the 4 Stroke have/require 25 inch transoms, from what I've read.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-31-2008, 08:49 AM
Waxy Waxy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jefferson View Post
Interestingly, the 115 Optimax is the one they don't have in stock; if I went with the 115 4 stroke, they've got at least one that fits our needs. The price difference isn't huge between the two 115s, but the 90 Optimax is a fair bit less. The 90 HP 2 Stroke (not Opti) is about $2400 less. Makes the decision...interesting

Thanks for the website; I'll check that out.
I don't think you can really go wrong with the Opti or 4 Stroke 115. They both have their pros and cons, but they'll both serve you well.

That will be the best $2400 you'll ever spend...

Waxy
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-31-2008, 10:09 AM
jefferson jefferson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 59
Default

Thanks for the links and opinions; I think we're going to go with the Superhawk 1700, and the 115 Optimax, and we're going to Free Spirit Marine. It means we'll have to wait a couple months for our boat to come in, but I can also order it exactly the way we want it. I have no need for a stereo upgrade, that's for sure.

Thanks again; much appreciated!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-31-2008, 08:59 PM
gage251 gage251 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 21
Default superhawk

Yeah I just bought the 1700 superhawk with a 115 4 stroke and i'm DYING to get out with it. Let me know what you think of the opti on that boat! Maybe we can race and put the talking to an end!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-31-2008, 10:58 PM
Mulestalker's Avatar
Mulestalker Mulestalker is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dino Valley,Alberta Kanada
Posts: 728
Default

I have the 1750 Sport Angler with the 115 4stk and have no regrets about the 4stk.Not super quick out of the hole but gets it done,cruises 40-41mph gps with one guy,tackle,etc.Smoke free,quiet,touch the key and it starts.
Heard the Opti's lack the bottom end torque,like all 2 strokes so really no gain, unless you mess with vented props,etc.I believe one advantage may be trolling,using the smart gauges one can turn the idle speed down for better trolling speeds.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-31-2008, 11:59 PM
jefferson jefferson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 59
Default

Ordered our boat today; can't wait for delivery time!! Man, this feels like Christmas- 7 years old, I know what's under the tree, but I have to wait until morning...only "morning" is like two months away!!!
BTW, Thane down at Free Spirit Marine was very helpful; I'd recommend them to anyone. Their secretary (I think) even played with my kids for a while, and then found some chocolate for them while we worked things out on the boat. Great job by them, let me tell you!!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-01-2008, 11:54 AM
JohninAB's Avatar
JohninAB JohninAB is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Central Alberta
Posts: 6,670
Default

jefferson, congrats on the boat purchase. Thane and the staff at Free Spirit Marine were awesome when i dealt with them and picked my boat up. Not sure how you are going to handle waiting that long for your boat as I waited two weeks and that nearly killed me.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-01-2008, 12:06 PM
jefferson jefferson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 59
Default

Alright, no more mocking smilies
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-01-2008, 12:41 PM
SNAPFisher SNAPFisher is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,444
Default

No worries. I ordered my Fishhawk 1600 sc at the same time as you last year. By July I was out with it on the water. I think your going to really enjoy it.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-01-2008, 03:55 PM
Tredeb Tredeb is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulestalker View Post
Heard the Opti's lack the bottom end torque,like all 2 strokes so really no gain, unless you mess with vented props,etc.I believe one advantage may be trolling,using the smart gauges one can turn the idle speed down for better trolling speeds.
Huh?

When I was buying my boat last year, a dealer told me an opti would have more snort than a 4 stroke when it came to water sports. Maybe it comes from weight difference, but in all my experience, the bottom end is one place where a two stroke still shines.

I have friends with optis and fourstrokes and they are all happy with their boats. From what I can see, I wouldn't change much on any of their boats either.

For the record, I have an etec, but I looked into mercs a fair bit when I was purchasing.

trev
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-01-2008, 05:07 PM
jefferson jefferson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 59
Default

That's exactly what we were told by Thane at free spirit marine; the two stroke will out-perform the four. We went with the two stroke at his urging, even though I was planning on going with the 4 when I saw how close they were in price. I appreciated the advice, especially given that it wasn't making him any money; I saved $$ with the 2 stroke.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-02-2008, 10:13 AM
Mulestalker's Avatar
Mulestalker Mulestalker is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dino Valley,Alberta Kanada
Posts: 728
Default

2 stroke needs rpm to build torque, outboards can't go from idle to 5500rpm unless slippage occurs,this is why I mentioned prop venting,venting creates slip thus creates rpm,once on plane vented/non vented their is no difference.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.