Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2012, 11:38 AM
35 whelen 35 whelen is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: GRAND PRAIRIE
Posts: 5,720
Default Cold lake 2012-2013

any info on ice yet at cold lake thanks cant wait to get out in late dec .a c&r from last year
Attached Images
File Type: jpg icefishing.jpg (29.6 KB, 1016 views)
File Type: jpg IMG019.jpg (34.9 KB, 946 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-26-2012, 12:10 PM
Fishabs Fishabs is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Airdrie, Alberta
Posts: 56
Default

I feel your pain! Nice lakers by the way; glad to hear they got to spawn again.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-26-2012, 10:13 PM
Fingers Fingers is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1
Default

Hope we get to go wright away got new flasher it's your buddy with 3fingers lol
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-27-2012, 05:42 AM
splake0 splake0 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cold Lake
Posts: 530
Default

Was at French Bay 2 days ago. Not much ice yet. Probably be another 3 weeks or more.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-27-2012, 06:29 AM
Kim473's Avatar
Kim473 Kim473 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,470
Default

Never fished lakers before. What test pound line do you use and what kind?

That is sure a beauty!
__________________
Kim

Gonna get me a 16" perch.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-27-2012, 07:35 AM
Teamprotz's Avatar
Teamprotz Teamprotz is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: LLoydminster
Posts: 1,253
Default

I use 14lb fireline crystal with a 6ft 17lb mono leader. When fishing deep water with a short rod ( sounds like the start of a joke ? ) you want to try eliminate as much line stretch as possible for best feel and hookset.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-27-2012, 10:35 AM
LCCFisherman LCCFisherman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 932
Default

Water temp on cold is warmer than normal for this time of the year. Could be mid-late january by the time its safe for vehicles. For those with skidoos/quads might be able to get out earlier.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-27-2012, 10:39 AM
Lakers Lakers is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 14
Default rumored reg changes

anyone know if the reg change is happening on cold lake for next year - curious what folks think about them?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-27-2012, 11:18 AM
35 whelen 35 whelen is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: GRAND PRAIRIE
Posts: 5,720
Default A few more fish from last year

a few more lakers from last year.cant wait .
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG014.jpg (50.9 KB, 370 views)
File Type: jpg new phone 014.jpg (24.4 KB, 361 views)
File Type: jpg new phone 049.jpg (35.2 KB, 415 views)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-27-2012, 11:46 AM
Barbwire's Avatar
Barbwire Barbwire is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 177
Default

I have heard the minimum size will be going from 65cm upto 75cm next year on cold lake. I know 10cm doesnt sound like much but its going to be alot harder getting that laker to take home for the smoker!!

Cant wait to get out when she freezes over


Barbwire
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-27-2012, 02:14 PM
splake0 splake0 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cold Lake
Posts: 530
Default

Sask Regs have it proposed for next year (75 cms). i don't agree with it for a lot more fish will die when this regulation takes effect.

Not meaning to high jack this tread but it pertains to Cold Lake.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-27-2012, 03:19 PM
mikebossy mikebossy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 306
Default

interested to hear reasoning why more fish would die??
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-30-2012, 03:19 AM
fisherman420 fisherman420 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LCCFisherman View Post
Water temp on cold is warmer than normal for this time of the year. Could be mid-late january by the time its safe for vehicles. For those with skidoos/quads might be able to get out earlier.
Whats all this warmer talk on "cold" lake, go stick your thermometer in there and let me know when I can bring my tracked up UTV there and power mooch for some hard water LKTR's
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-30-2012, 04:33 AM
pickrel pat pickrel pat is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebossy View Post
interested to hear reasoning why more fish would die??
I thinl he means that people will be catching and handling alot more fish trying to get a keeper now... the more fish caught and handled, the higher the mortality rate.... and bringing fish up to fast from the depths is not that great on fish.... or maybe he meant something totally different....... lol.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-30-2012, 06:30 AM
Kim473's Avatar
Kim473 Kim473 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebossy View Post
interested to hear reasoning why more fish would die??
Bring fish up from 100 feet down too fast, handle them then put them back in the water. For sure there will be alot more that die. Seen perch, brought up from only 25 feet down, get the bends. I hait slot sizes and c&r. Too much mortality rate! Kills fish for no reason.

Here is a thought, lets put a slot size on white tail deer!
after you shot one, weight it, if it does not hit between 250 and 275 lbs, put it back! LOL

C&R , slot sizes, are a joke. If you don't want fish taken, CLOSE the lake.
__________________
Kim

Gonna get me a 16" perch.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-30-2012, 09:38 AM
LCCFisherman LCCFisherman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 932
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fisherman420 View Post
whats all this warmer talk on "cold" lake, go stick your thermometer in there and let me know when i can bring my tracked up utv there and power mooch for some hard water lktr's
cold lake is dead!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-30-2012, 09:39 AM
savethesalmon savethesalmon is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: ontario
Posts: 15
Default

closing one species creates pressure on other species. Slot sizes have their uses and can be effective closing entire lakes puts pressure on other lakes
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-30-2012, 01:51 PM
burbotman14's Avatar
burbotman14 burbotman14 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 379
Default

Lake tout have the ability to release air from their air bladder when brought up from deep water. Since the majority of lake trout are under 75cm, almost all of the trout would end up being released, and all these undersize trout would be succeptable to the usual factors of mishandling or getting hooked deep. IMO, I think 75 cm minimum limit is a little rediculous because that's keeping lake trout that are 10 pounds plus and these trout are the spawners. As well, from my experience most of the fish I caught during my trips were in the 60-70 cm range so there's lots of fish to be caught and kept that are around the existing minimum size limit.
__________________
I don't live to fish, I fish to live.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-30-2012, 04:25 PM
Walleyes Walleyes is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N/E Alberta.
Posts: 4,957
Default

Although there is no shortage of laker's in the lake there sure is getting to be a shortage of big fish. Alberta will do the normal when it comes to Cold Lake, they will continue to let it get pillaged of big spawner's and keep throwing the aggressive smaller feeders back n until they eat themselves out of house and home and then get stunted and skinny and start to die off. Then they will sen in some university students to do krill surveys for 2 summers and they will determine the lake has been fished out and close it for 5 years and,,,, we start over again,, you know the same old same old..

It would be so easy to just put a slot size in, let people keep one between 45 - 65 to take home to eat and they are the aggressive feeders anyways and hard on the food supply. Throw the big trophy fish back in.. Thats what most of us that fish the lake regularly are after anyways.. laker's re one of the poorest eating fish there are especially the big fish,, utterly gross is what they are. But the smaller fish if cooked hard enough aren't bad.

But hey this is Alberta,, lets screw it up royally then fix it,,, right..
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-30-2012, 04:32 PM
Walleye101's Avatar
Walleye101 Walleye101 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 763
Default

You hit it right on top of head Walleyes. This province is completely bass ackwards. Another good fishery going down the drain. Quick! everybody get out there this winter and keep all the big fish you can!!!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-30-2012, 05:00 PM
Supergrit Supergrit is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,031
Default

One day probably soon will be draw and tag
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-30-2012, 10:35 PM
echo's Avatar
echo echo is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walleyes View Post
Although there is no shortage of laker's in the lake there sure is getting to be a shortage of big fish. Alberta will do the normal when it comes to Cold Lake, they will continue to let it get pillaged of big spawner's and keep throwing the aggressive smaller feeders back n until they eat themselves out of house and home and then get stunted and skinny and start to die off. Then they will sen in some university students to do krill surveys for 2 summers and they will determine the lake has been fished out and close it for 5 years and,,,, we start over again,, you know the same old same old..

It would be so easy to just put a slot size in, let people keep one between 45 - 65 to take home to eat and they are the aggressive feeders anyways and hard on the food supply. Throw the big trophy fish back in.. Thats what most of us that fish the lake regularly are after anyways.. laker's re one of the poorest eating fish there are especially the big fish,, utterly gross is what they are. But the smaller fish if cooked hard enough aren't bad.

But hey this is Alberta,, lets screw it up royally then fix it,,, right..
well said sad but true !
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-30-2012, 10:57 PM
HunterDave HunterDave is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Copperhead Road, Morinville
Posts: 19,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbwire View Post
I have heard the minimum size will be going from 65cm up to 75cm next year on cold lake. I know 10cm doesn't sound like much but its going to be alot harder getting that laker to take home for the smoker!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by splake0 View Post
Sask Regs have it proposed for next year (75 cms). i don't agree with it for a lot more fish will die when this regulation takes effect.
It would make sense to me that both provinces would work together on a new reg such as this for Cold Lake. What I'd like to know is the reasoning behind making the change. Is it because the biologists think that it is required in order to sustain a healthy population of lakers in the lake? Or, is it another backdoor job by Trout Unlimited to change the regs in the name of growing fish bigger to catch (aka "Quality" fishery).
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-30-2012, 11:08 PM
tight line's Avatar
tight line tight line is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,484
Default

Thought they were 75 last year... Good thing we kept 85-90 cm'ers only... Lol
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-01-2012, 09:56 AM
mikebossy mikebossy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim473 View Post
Bring fish up from 100 feet down too fast, handle them then put them back in the water. For sure there will be alot more that die. Seen perch, brought up from only 25 feet down, get the bends. I hait slot sizes and c&r. Too much mortality rate! Kills fish for no reason.

Here is a thought, lets put a slot size on white tail deer!
after you shot one, weight it, if it does not hit between 250 and 275 lbs, put it back! LOL

C&R , slot sizes, are a joke. If you don't want fish taken, CLOSE the lake.
Lake trout don't suffer from the bends, as long as you don't horse em in at mach 3 with a turbo winch, the bends does/do not affect lake trout! if you pay attention when catching one in the summer(harder to see in winter), you'll notice them put in a big effort on the way up to stop, 'dig there heels in', probably at about 25 feet below the boat or so, and if you're real lucky/observant you might see bubbles that they expel to rid there air bladders of all the expanded gases they've accumulated from rising in the water column, completely different from walleye or perch which can't expel those gases, notice the air sac coming out of the perch's mouth when u catch them in 25 feet,
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-01-2012, 10:49 AM
Safety D Safety D is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,463
Default

Its ALIVE when i was there last !!!!!!
__________________
Safety D !!!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-01-2012, 12:20 PM
208prov 208prov is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebossy View Post
Lake trout don't suffer from the bends, as long as you don't horse em in at mach 3 with a turbo winch, the bends does/do not affect lake trout! if you pay attention when catching one in the summer(harder to see in winter), you'll notice them put in a big effort on the way up to stop, 'dig there heels in', probably at about 25 feet below the boat or so, and if you're real lucky/observant you might see bubbles that they expel to rid there air bladders of all the expanded gases they've accumulated from rising in the water column, completely different from walleye or perch which can't expel those gases, notice the air sac coming out of the perch's mouth when u catch them in 25 feet,
I have seen the air sack come out the mouth of trout also but not that often.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-03-2012, 11:27 AM
savethesalmon savethesalmon is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: ontario
Posts: 15
Default

With the reg change maybe all the fish over 75 cm will be removed along with the genes to grow 75cm plus eliminating all the large lake trout we seek.
Seeing a fish over 75 cm will be very rare in a few years. Just a thought what does everyone else think?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-03-2012, 11:29 AM
LCCFisherman LCCFisherman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 932
Default

Seemed to ruin all the walleye lakes with a large minimum size.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-03-2012, 01:24 PM
splake0 splake0 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cold Lake
Posts: 530
Default

Getting back on topic.....I just got back from French Bay. It is totally froze over. Won't be long now!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.