Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-22-2018, 09:41 AM
timsesink timsesink is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,748
Default Should the Strathcona WT primitive license be changed to include mule deer?

I hunt Strathcona County very regularly with both bow & shotgun and have permission on a great quarter. The quarter I hunt is absolutely overrun with mule deer with at least 10-20 spotted every night. However there's hardly a WT to be found. I took a small WT buck first week of the primitive weapon season but have since not seen a single WT.

While I know deer populations can be very localized I'm wondering if it's time the Strathcona license became something like the Wainwright tag which is two deer, either sex, either species.

Thoughts from other guys hunting different quarters?

Last edited by timsesink; 11-22-2018 at 09:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-22-2018, 09:45 AM
bitterrootfly bitterrootfly is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: South West Alberta and K-Country
Posts: 421
Default

Don’t hunt there but if it were changed I could see myself making the trip for Muzzleloader season, I’m interested to see what other people who hunt there have to say.
__________________
Either write something worthy of doing or do something worthy of writing about.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-22-2018, 09:56 AM
buckmasterjr buckmasterjr is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 542
Default

100% agree. We hunt private land that was previously in wmu 250 and is now part of 248. There are far more mule deer than whitetails in the area. The only way to hunt them now is archery season. Permission in this area is also hard to come by. At the very least they should add a draw for them during the primitive weapons season.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-22-2018, 10:28 AM
bitterrootfly bitterrootfly is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: South West Alberta and K-Country
Posts: 421
Default

Adding on to this, why isn’t there a similar system to Strathcona county in foothills county 212 in the Calgary bowzone?
__________________
Either write something worthy of doing or do something worthy of writing about.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-22-2018, 10:33 AM
timsesink timsesink is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bitterrootfly View Post
Adding on to this, why isn’t there a similar system to Strathcona county in foothills county 212 in the Calgary bowzone?
From what I understand (and I may be wrong) the bow hunting associations have fought tooth and nail to prevent any expansion of primitive weapons zones and related tags.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-22-2018, 12:19 PM
bitterrootfly bitterrootfly is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: South West Alberta and K-Country
Posts: 421
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timsesink View Post
From what I understand (and I may be wrong) the bow hunting associations have fought tooth and nail to prevent any expansion of primitive weapons zones and related tags.
I know there is a foothills antlerless deer license December 1-20 or something like that where muzzleloader are allowed in 212, that’s why I’m confused, if we have this season why not just extend it and allow deer of either species, and either sex during the same time frame.
__________________
Either write something worthy of doing or do something worthy of writing about.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.