Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-01-2013, 10:17 AM
rugerparts rugerparts is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 59
Default Lever action pistol ammo rifles

I'm considering purchasing a lever action rifle chambered for one of the pistol rounds (.357, .44). I would be interested in hearing about any experiences with the different models out there.
__________________
Your pedantry is my scholarship.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-01-2013, 10:22 AM
duceman duceman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: south of calgary
Posts: 1,831
Default

old marlins in 357 and 44 have treated me well. haven't had time to wring out my new 41, maybe today, lee
__________________
220swifty

1. People who list their arguments in bullets points or numerical order generally come off as condescending pecker heads.

2. #1 is true.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-01-2013, 10:27 AM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,611
Default

Fun fun fun.
Had and sold an older 1894 Marlin in 44 mag, should never have sold it. Shot white box Winchester 240's fantastic. Reloaded 265gr. Jfp's and 4227 were doubly fun and accurate.

One buddy has a 94 Winchester trapper in 38/357, shoots great, 158gr. Cast 38's are insanely fun, while 158gr. XTP's in the 357 are pretty awesome on 60yd deer.
__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-01-2013, 10:30 AM
Big Thumper Big Thumper is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,066
Default

Have a M92 TD in 38/40. Not really a pistol cartridge as much as a throwback to when cowboys used the same in rifle and pistol. New Japanese manufactor and its a real sweetheart. Be one of the last of mine to ever go...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-01-2013, 10:36 AM
rugerparts rugerparts is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 59
Default

1894 in .44 was exactly what I was considering. So no major feed or accuracy problems then? If I read the ballistics sights right those are point blank out to about 50 yards how's the accuracy beyond that? Up until now most of my shooting has been with more streamlined bullets.
__________________
Your pedantry is my scholarship.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-01-2013, 10:54 AM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,611
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rugerparts View Post
1894 in .44 was exactly what I was considering. So no major feed or accuracy problems then? If I read the ballistics sights right those are point blank out to about 50 yards how's the accuracy beyond that? Up until now most of my shooting has been with more streamlined bullets.
Good all the way to 200yds.
50 yds pffft what sort of lousy shot are you!

Real men shoot way further these days, close range stuff is for sissy's!
__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-01-2013, 10:54 AM
El-Brento El-Brento is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 307
Default

I have a Henry Big Boy in 44 mag, it's a ton of fun to shoot. I put a Skinner peep sight on it. Action is super smooth and fit and finish is great.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-01-2013, 02:06 PM
polaris rider polaris rider is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 20
Default

I had a Marlin Cowboy 1894 in .357 mag....one of the nicest shooting carbines i ever had, deadly out to 100 meters...one of those that got away unfortunately, some lucky fellow in Calgary now has it....would by another one in a heartbeat
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-01-2013, 02:09 PM
polaris rider polaris rider is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284 View Post
Good all the way to 200yds.
50 yds pffft what sort of lousy shot are you!

Real men shoot way further these days, close range stuff is for sissy's!
no reply to this crap as i hate seeing real men cry
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-01-2013, 02:21 PM
rugerparts rugerparts is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284 View Post
Good all the way to 200yds.
50 yds pffft what sort of lousy shot are you!

Real men shoot way further these days, close range stuff is for sissy's!
Good all the way to 200 yards though the round may be, you can't expect point blank accuracy beyond 75 yards unless you are doing your shooting on the moon. I'd explain that statement further but rather than starting a debate on physical fact I'd rather celebrate your superior marksmanship. Shoot long and prosper.
__________________
Your pedantry is my scholarship.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-01-2013, 04:00 PM
justsomeguy justsomeguy is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Okotoks
Posts: 1,069
Default

Have a Rossi Ranch Hand in 357, fun to play with and great for out in the woods. Lots of guys use them for "quad guns"....short length is better than a full size gun case on the handlebars snagging on everything.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-01-2013, 04:44 PM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,611
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rugerparts View Post
Good all the way to 200 yards though the round may be, you can't expect point blank accuracy beyond 75 yards unless you are doing your shooting on the moon. I'd explain that statement further but rather than starting a debate on physical fact I'd rather celebrate your superior marksmanship. Shoot long and prosper.
C'mon, put all the technology into play like one of them fancy scopes you see on them long range tv shows.

What's the difference if it's a 44 mag at 200 or a 7 mag at 900?

I saw it on tv, you wouldn't want to bad mouth those guys would ya?
__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-01-2013, 04:53 PM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284 View Post
C'mon, put all the technology into play like one of them fancy scopes you see on them long range tv shows.

What's the difference if it's a 44 mag at 200 or a 7 mag at 900?

I saw it on tv, you wouldn't want to bad mouth those guys would ya?
Oh oh...am I seeing a bit of new years resolution shining through...

15 mins with a trained professional and you will be wacking 1000yard gongs all day and then some

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-01-2013, 04:58 PM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polaris rider View Post
no reply to this crap as i hate seeing real men cry
Refer to post below....add a dash of sarcasm and thats what you get

http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showthread.php?t=162008

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-01-2013, 05:00 PM
Backwoods Runner's Avatar
Backwoods Runner Backwoods Runner is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rocky Mtn. Hse.
Posts: 344
Default

Just as bad as a 80 yrd. archery shot or a 300 yrd muzzleloader shot.
Capable, Yes, ethical, No.
I own two lever guns and have taken animals with them and they worked very well. Nothing shot over 75 yrds. though.


Oh ya. You don't DICK!
I've seen him do it.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-01-2013, 05:33 PM
rugerparts rugerparts is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284 View Post
C'mon, put all the technology into play like one of them fancy scopes you see on them long range tv shows.

What's the difference if it's a 44 mag at 200 or a 7 mag at 900?

I saw it on tv, you wouldn't want to bad mouth those guys would ya?
Never let it be said that I failed to believe everything I saw on TV. Perhapse if I were to call it point blank range or point blank trajectory or maybe if I just mount my technomelogical scope on top of 40" rings we we can set aside the nomenclature snafu and focus on the question of accuracy.

Now lets call irony meets sarcasm a draw and you can tell me what if any problems you ever had with your 1894.
__________________
Your pedantry is my scholarship.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-01-2013, 05:44 PM
rugatika rugatika is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 17,790
Default

I've got a Marlin 1894 assault rifle in 44mag. Picked it up this spring, put a skinner sight on it, and replaced the firing pin. Happy, happy, happy.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.